ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#79199 - 12/03/01 12:49 PM 300-5d
Scott Yeazell Offline
Junior Member
Registered: 12/03/01
Posts: 4
Loc: Springfield, OH, USA
Do underground service entrance conductors installed by directional boring method rather than trenching require a warning ribbon?
Top
2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
#79200 - 12/03/01 01:06 PM Re: 300-5d
resqcapt19 Offline
Member
Registered: 11/10/00
Posts: 2148
Loc: IL
Yes. There were proposals made to provide such an exemption, but they were rejected. The chances of damage from future excavation do not change just because you used a closed rather than open excavation method for the installation. If you want to bore you will have to do it twice, one for the cable and one for the ribbon.
Don(resqcapt19)
_________________________
Don(resqcapt19)
Top
#79201 - 12/04/01 05:12 PM Re: 300-5d
resqcapt19 Offline
Member
Registered: 11/10/00
Posts: 2148
Loc: IL
As the result of a follow up question to me from Scott on this subject via e-mail I did some additional research. My original post is not entirely correct.
A proposal was submitted to the NFPA for a change in 300-5(d) for the 2002 code. This was proposal 3-43. The proposal asked that the following wording be added to 300-5(d): "Horizontally bored service laterals shall be exempt from this requirement." Code Making Panel 3 rejected the proposal with the statement that; "Present language only addresses trenching, not boring, thus boring is already excluded from the ribbon requirement".
This indicates to me that the panel did not intend to require a ribbon above cables that were installed by boring. It aprears to me, that based on the panel comment, if you are operating under the 99 code, a ribbon would not be required for conductors installed by boring. Also note the new wording applies to all underground service conductors, not just service laterals as in the 99 code.
Don(resqcapt19)

[This message has been edited by resqcapt19 (edited 12-05-2001).]
_________________________
Don(resqcapt19)
Top
#79202 - 12/06/01 05:14 PM Re: 300-5d
Nick Offline
Member
Registered: 08/13/01
Posts: 599
Loc: Riverside, CA
Quote:
The chances of damage from future excavation do not change just because you used a closed rather than open excavation method for the installation.

I agree with this statement more than the panels findings.
Top

Member Spotlight
Member Since: 02/23/13
Posts: 204
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box


Who's Online
0 registered (), 48 Guests and 12 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
 
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
 
Top Posters (30 Days)
Admin 47
HotLine1 43
gfretwell 19
Ruben Rocha 12
Trumpy 9
 
Newest Members
KrmtFrg, Stack, Scotto, Freecrowder, clee512

ECN Electrical Forums - sponsored by Electrical Contractor Network - Electrical and Code Related Discussion for Electrical Contractors, Electricians, Inspectors, Instructors, Engineers and other related Professionals