ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#78911 - 11/08/01 02:50 PM nec2002 250.118
ggardiner Offline
Member
Registered: 10/22/01
Posts: 81
Loc: Calgary, Alberta Canada
Can anyone tell me what are the listed cables with acceptable ground return paths are. As it is referred to in 517.13.
Haven't received my copy of 2002 yet and I have to plan installations for the year year.
Top
2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
#78912 - 11/11/01 05:23 AM Re: nec2002 250.118
electure Offline


Member
Registered: 12/24/00
Posts: 4259
Loc: Fullerton, CA USA
The Code does not list cables as being approved or not. It only (517.13) requires that:
"The metal raceway system, or cable armor, or sheath assembly shall itself qualify as an equipment grounding return path in accordance with 250.118."
The cable's listing is what will determine its acceptability
Although they mention A/C, M/C, & M/I cable, the only one I know of is A/C for your useage.
This is nearly a repeat of the Q you already asked in another section of the BB.
Check there

[This message has been edited by electure (edited 11-11-2001).]
Top
#78913 - 11/11/01 06:04 AM Re: nec2002 250.118
Joe Tedesco Offline
Member
Registered: 10/07/00
Posts: 2749
Loc: Boston, Massachusetts USA
2002 NEC 250.118 (11) Type MC cable where listed and identified for grounding in accordance with the following:

a. The combined metallic sheath and grounding conductor of interlocked metal tape type MC cable

b. The metallic sheath or the combined metallic sheath and grounding conductors of the smooth or corrugated tube type MC cable


[This message has been edited by Joe Tedesco (edited 11-11-2001).]
_________________________
Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant
Top
#78914 - 11/11/01 06:06 AM Re: nec2002 250.118
sparky Offline
Member
Registered: 10/18/00
Posts: 5303
lemme see,
the only real 250.118 change in 02' is 250.118(1)
A copper, aluminum, or copper clad aluminum conductor.......
Top
#78915 - 11/11/01 06:53 AM Re: nec2002 250.118
electure Offline


Member
Registered: 12/24/00
Posts: 4259
Loc: Fullerton, CA USA
Be sure to check with the local AHJ as to what edition of the Code they are using before you incorporate any 2002 changes.
Many of them in my area are still basing everything on the '96 Code!
Top
#78916 - 11/11/01 08:35 AM Re: nec2002 250.118
resqcapt19 Offline
Member
Registered: 11/10/00
Posts: 2148
Loc: IL
Joe,
Just so everyone understands, the combined metallic sheath and the grounding conductor of the interlocking armor type MC cable does not meet the requirement in 517.13.
don(resqcapt19)
_________________________
Don(resqcapt19)
Top
#78917 - 11/11/01 12:58 PM Re: nec2002 250.118
Joe Tedesco Offline
Member
Registered: 10/07/00
Posts: 2749
Loc: Boston, Massachusetts USA
Here is the exact reference from the new 2002 NEC. What part of this is not clear or understood?



And here is what the 2002 NEC says in 250.118 (11) Type MC cable where listed and identified for grounding in accordance with the following:
a. The combined metallic sheath and grounding conductor of interlocked metal tape type MC cable

b. The metallic sheath or the combined metallic sheath and grounding conductors of the smooth or corrugated tube type MC cable




[This message has been edited by Joe Tedesco (edited 11-11-2001).]
_________________________
Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant
Top
#78918 - 11/11/01 01:17 PM Re: nec2002 250.118
resqcapt19 Offline
Member
Registered: 11/10/00
Posts: 2148
Loc: IL
Joe,
My point is that MC cable that is listed as an EGC per 250.118(11)(a) is not suitable for 517.13 installations because the sheath istself does not qualify as an EGC. It only qualifies when combined with the internal grounding conductor, and therefore does not meet the requirements of 517.13.
Don(resqcapt19)
_________________________
Don(resqcapt19)
Top
#78919 - 11/11/01 02:29 PM Re: nec2002 250.118
electure Offline


Member
Registered: 12/24/00
Posts: 4259
Loc: Fullerton, CA USA
Joe,
Do you know a company that has type MC or MI Cable that meets the requirements? (Come on, now!) What part don't you understand?
My concern is that if Mr Gardiner specs a freak, it will be a long lead-time item, and will not be acceptable when his EC gets it.
Use AFC's type AC-HCF (as Nick said) or an approved equal, and you can put it to bed.
Top
#78920 - 11/11/01 03:15 PM Re: nec2002 250.118
Joe Tedesco Offline
Member
Registered: 10/07/00
Posts: 2749
Loc: Boston, Massachusetts USA
Look here:

http://www.afcweb.com/table2.html
http://www.afcweb.com/fieldhcf.htm

Seems like MC cable is also approved for Fire Alarms.



[This message has been edited by Joe Tedesco (edited 11-11-2001).]
_________________________
Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant
Top
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >

Member Spotlight
Member Since: 07/05/02
Posts: 8211
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box


Who's Online
0 registered (), 84 Guests and 9 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
 
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
 
Top Posters (30 Days)
Admin 47
HotLine1 43
gfretwell 19
Ruben Rocha 12
Trumpy 9
 
Newest Members
Scotto, Freecrowder, clee512, Jdscott2005, FAIZAN

ECN Electrical Forums - sponsored by Electrical Contractor Network - Electrical and Code Related Discussion for Electrical Contractors, Electricians, Inspectors, Instructors, Engineers and other related Professionals