The Electrical Contractor Network

ECN Electrical Forum
Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

Books, Tools and Test Equipment for Electrical and Construction Trades

Register Now!

Register Now!

We want your input!

Featured:
   

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

   
Recent Posts
Industrail Control Panel bonding per 409.108
by sparkyinak
Yesterday at 03:17 PM
Calling all Non-US members!! (Non-US only)
by aussie240
12/07/16 02:39 AM
Photo Upload Tutorial
by DanK
12/06/16 11:35 PM
Sprinklered equipment 26-008
by bigpapa
12/02/16 04:24 PM
On Delay Relay with Auto Reset
by Potseal
12/01/16 09:59 AM
New in the Gallery:
12.5A through 0.75mm˛ flex (just out of curiosity)
Shout Box

Top Posters (30 Days)
gfretwell 13
HotLine1 9
sparkyinak 8
Texas_Ranger 8
Trumpy 6
Who's Online
0 registered (), 226 Guests and 5 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 >
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#78264 - 09/01/01 01:27 PM SE vs. USE
Redsy Offline
Member

Registered: 03/28/01
Posts: 2138
Loc: Bucks County PA
I got a call yesterday to re-do a service upgrade(someone elses)that failed inspection due to 10-12' distance between entrance and Service Panel. The inspector didn't seem to mind that--
1) Service Entrance is 200 amp SE cable buried in 2" PVC from pole-mounted meter socket 30' away.
2) PVC is buried 6-8" deep. Enters below grade. Pokes out in crawl space as cable (no pipe).

Owners suggestion-
1)He will dig new 18"(O.K. with PVC)trench to closer proximity of Panel(2-3').
2)Re-route conduit. Re-use SE Cable.
3)Keep entrance point underground.

I'm thinking no SE Cable underground, even in conduit.
Install new run of USE.
Keep conduit to reduce burial depth from 24" to 18".

Question-
I have only ever installed USE as single conductors. Is multi-conductor USE available as a covered assembly that, when I enter the building, I can run exposed 2-3' to the panel?

Top
2014 / 2011 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
#78265 - 09/01/01 02:19 PM Re: SE vs. USE
sparky Offline
Member

Registered: 10/18/00
Posts: 5545
Redsy;
I only know of triplex, and some quadriplex USE, no outer covering....

Top
#78266 - 09/01/01 02:51 PM Re: SE vs. USE
Redsy Offline
Member

Registered: 03/28/01
Posts: 2138
Loc: Bucks County PA
The penetration to the basement will be close to the panel and if I pipe it, there won't be a lot of room to work 2" fittings. Maybe I'll hit the back of a j-box, and switch(splice)to SE there.

Top
#78267 - 09/01/01 03:05 PM Re: SE vs. USE
golf junkie Offline
Member

Registered: 04/22/01
Posts: 511
Loc: York, NE
 Quote:
Originally posted by Redsy:
The penetration to the basement will be close to the panel and if I pipe it, there won't be a lot of room to work 2" fittings. Maybe I'll hit the back of a j-box, and switch(splice)to SE there.


I know it probably won't be easy to get the conduit in, but I would not install a splice box in the SE conductors. I know that the code allows it now.....but I think that it's still a poor practice.

Run the conduit all the way to the panel. You'll sleep better.

GJ

Top
#78268 - 09/01/01 04:42 PM Re: SE vs. USE
sparky Offline
Member

Registered: 10/18/00
Posts: 5545
Can you arrange for a stub of pipe directly into the back of the panel?

Top
#78269 - 09/01/01 08:09 PM Re: SE vs. USE
Redsy Offline
Member

Registered: 03/28/01
Posts: 2138
Loc: Bucks County PA
 Quote:
Originally posted by sparky:
Can you arrange for a stub of pipe directly into the back of the panel?

Good idea! Maybe, but a pain in the you-know-what. The top would be too high with regard to the burial depth. The bottom would be so low as to require the depth to be increased by about 10" at the penetration point. I guess I could slope the last few feet of pipe prior to the penetration.And I'll have to swing the panel out of the way, but it still might be the least aggravating way to go.(Glad I thought of it! )

Top
#78270 - 09/02/01 03:10 AM Re: SE vs. USE
sparky Offline
Member

Registered: 10/18/00
Posts: 5545
hey great! I hope it works. just be sure and stuff a pack of dux seal in it so it does'nt let h20 into your panel....

Top
#78271 - 09/02/01 07:11 AM Re: SE vs. USE
Bill Addiss Offline
Member

Registered: 10/07/00
Posts: 4196
Loc: NY, USA
Question,

Would it be allowed to strip the jacket from the SE cable that's in the conduit? And the conduit pokes into the crawlspace with a Female connector on the end and SE cable connector, so it runs as SE to the panel?

What do you think? What would the objections (if any) be?

Bill

Top
#78272 - 09/02/01 07:36 AM Re: SE vs. USE
Redsy Offline
Member

Registered: 03/28/01
Posts: 2138
Loc: Bucks County PA
What about this buiness of running SE in the buried PVC. Bad thing, not approved for bvurial. Correct? This was a big(full page ad in Yellow Pages, probably $800.00/month)local outfit. On the other hand, they didn't install a ground rod, didn't upsize the GEC, and didn't extend it to <5' of water entrance.
I hope to eventually find out how much they charged.

[This message has been edited by Redsy (edited 09-02-2001).]

Top
#78273 - 09/02/01 11:24 AM Re: SE vs. USE
Bill Addiss Offline
Member

Registered: 10/07/00
Posts: 4196
Loc: NY, USA
Redsy,

If it's in the conduit it's not Direct Buried. If it's stripped is it still SE?
The conductors have to be rated for wet locations don't they? Anyone know an official position on this?

Bill

Top
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 >



ECN Electrical Forums - sponsored by Electrical Contractor Network - Electrical and Code Related Discussion for Electrical Contractors, Electricians, Inspectors, Instructors, Engineers and other related Professionals