The Electrical Contractor Network

ECN Electrical Forum
Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

Books, Tools and Test Equipment for Electrical and Construction Trades

Register Now!

Register Now!

We want your input!


2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Recent Posts
Parking lot pole light swap....
by gfretwell
Yesterday at 09:52 PM
International Wire Colour Codes
by Texas_Ranger
Yesterday at 08:24 AM
Son of Sparky
by HotLine1
10/20/16 07:43 PM
Speaking of Plugmold ...
by gfretwell
10/17/16 02:37 PM
Broken battery charger? Check for cobwebs!
by gfretwell
10/17/16 02:30 PM
New in the Gallery:
12.5A through 0.75mm˛ flex (just out of curiosity)
Shout Box

Top Posters (30 Days)
gfretwell 12
renosteinke 6
HotLine1 6
ghost307 5
Potseal 4
Who's Online
1 registered (geoff in UK), 213 Guests and 4 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#77356 - 05/23/01 09:08 PM service/sub-panel upgrade
rmiell Offline

Registered: 11/09/00
Posts: 261
Loc: La Junta, Co. USA
Set-up: New 100amp electric service, with a new 100amp rated feeder to a sub-panel indoors. Neutral and grounds seperated in sub-panel. Wiring to range and dryer was not replaced, and both consist of copper se cable, with 2 insulated conductors, and an uninsulated conductor wrapped around the insulated two. Electrician landed these to the neutral bus in the sub-panel, but they are still bare, and can touch the enclosure.

What are my options? Tape up bare conductor, and leave on neutral bus? Leave them bare and land them on the grounding bus? Require complete replacement of cable to a 4-wire cable?

Code sections, please.


Rick Miell

2014 / 2011 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
#77357 - 05/23/01 09:35 PM Re: service/sub-panel upgrade

Leaving them bare is not an option because they loosely connect neutral to ground.

Landing them on the ground is not an option because they both conduct neutral current for the 120 V portion (motor, light, and timer on the dryer; clock, light, and timer on the range).

Since they are copper, I would tape rather than replace.

#77358 - 05/24/01 04:38 AM Re: service/sub-panel upgrade
sparky Offline

Registered: 10/18/00
Posts: 5545
250-140, read #3
the grounded conductor is insulated, or the grounded conductor is uninsulated and part of a Type SE service-ent cable and branch circuit originates at the service equip.

you sub is not service equip.(art 100)

[This message has been edited by sparky (edited 05-24-2001).]

#77359 - 05/24/01 05:21 AM Re: service/sub-panel upgrade
Redsy Offline

Registered: 03/28/01
Posts: 2138
Loc: Bucks County PA
If you can't replace them, taping and leaving on neutral bus is much better of two less than ideal options. This doesn't meet current code, but is not much different than what was permitted for years until a few codes ago. I know it is not the service equipment, but as long as neutral bus is isolated from grounds, it seems to be just a junction point.

#77360 - 05/24/01 09:42 AM Re: service/sub-panel upgrade
Bill Addiss Offline

Registered: 10/07/00
Posts: 4196
Loc: NY, USA

I don't think there is any specific justification for this in the code. I believe that it is however a popular solution to insulate the Bare conductor and land it on the Neutral bar, making sure that some unbroken sheathing extends through the clamp/connector into the Panelboard. This way it will not raise the potential of any exposed metallic parts.

It's a good compromise in my opinion. I'd say it's much better than allowing 3 wire service to remote panelboards because they are existing. (This has been discussed before). Perhaps you can check at IAEI BB to see what other AHJs' are allowing under these circumstances.


[This message has been edited by Bill Addiss (edited 05-24-2001).]


ECN Electrical Forums - sponsored by Electrical Contractor Network - Electrical and Code Related Discussion for Electrical Contractors, Electricians, Inspectors, Instructors, Engineers and other related Professionals