The Electrical Contractor Network

ECN Electrical Forum
Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

Books, Tools and Test Equipment for Electrical and Construction Trades

Register Now!

Register Now!

We want your input!

Featured:
   

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

   
Recent Posts
Calling all Non-US members!! (Non-US only)
by aussie240
Yesterday at 02:39 AM
Photo Upload Tutorial
by DanK
12/06/16 11:35 PM
Sprinklered equipment 26-008
by bigpapa
12/02/16 04:24 PM
On Delay Relay with Auto Reset
by Potseal
12/01/16 09:59 AM
Wow, that was close!
by jraef
11/28/16 07:06 PM
New in the Gallery:
12.5A through 0.75mm˛ flex (just out of curiosity)
Shout Box

Top Posters (30 Days)
gfretwell 13
HotLine1 9
Texas_Ranger 8
sparkyinak 7
Trumpy 6
Who's Online
1 registered (HotLine1), 214 Guests and 4 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#76743 - 03/19/01 02:47 PM Flexible metal and Liquidtight Flexible Metal Conduit Max Lengths for Flexibility
Steve Saylors Offline
Junior Member

Registered: 03/19/01
Posts: 1
Loc: Portland, Oregon, USA
NEC Art. 350 & 351 allows these wiring methods to be unsupported in lengths up to 3 feet at terminals where flexibility is required (such as at motors). Article 300-22(b) permits these wiring methods in lengths up to 4 feet to connect "physically adjustable equipment and devices in ducts and plenums". Does the location specific 300-22 (such as a fan motor in an air handler's casing) supercede the general requirements of 350/351 and allow UNSUPPORTED 4 foot lengths in this application?

Top
2014 / 2011 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
#76744 - 03/21/01 04:21 PM Re: Flexible metal and Liquidtight Flexible Metal Conduit Max Lengths for Flexibility
Bill Addiss Offline
Member

Registered: 10/07/00
Posts: 4196
Loc: NY, USA
Steve,

I was hoping that someone familiar with those code sections would reply. If it was my job I would provide a support so that the unsupported part is no longer than 3 feet. That, to me, would seem to satisfy everything. It seems to me that the 4 ft length mentioned is the total length allowed under those circumstances period. And since support (or lack of it) is not mentioned I would say that the provisions of 350/351 would apply and that 3 ft maximum unsupported length would be the rule.

Under 300-1(a) it says "This article covers wiring methods for all wiring installations unless modified by other articles"
I would say that 350/351 has the last word.

Any other opinions on this?

Bill

Top



ECN Electrical Forums - sponsored by Electrical Contractor Network - Electrical and Code Related Discussion for Electrical Contractors, Electricians, Inspectors, Instructors, Engineers and other related Professionals