The Electrical Contractor Network

ECN Electrical Forum
Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

Books, Tools and Test Equipment for Electrical and Construction Trades

Register Now!

Register Now!

We want your input!

Featured:
   

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

   
Recent Posts
Sprinklered equipment 26-008
by bigpapa
12/02/16 04:24 PM
On Delay Relay with Auto Reset
by Potseal
12/01/16 09:59 AM
Wow, that was close!
by jraef
11/28/16 07:06 PM
Earthquake in New Zeeland
by RODALCO
11/27/16 11:25 PM
Calling all Non-US members!! (Non-US only)
by Tjia1981
11/27/16 06:33 AM
New in the Gallery:
12.5A through 0.75mm˛ flex (just out of curiosity)
Shout Box

Top Posters (30 Days)
gfretwell 15
HotLine1 10
Trumpy 8
Texas_Ranger 8
sparkyinak 7
Who's Online
2 registered (NORCAL, sparkyinak), 205 Guests and 4 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#76674 - 03/10/01 10:39 AM Parallel conductors
Bill Addiss Offline
Member

Registered: 10/07/00
Posts: 4196
Loc: NY, USA
From the (E)Mailbag:

NEC SAYS YOU CANT' 'PARALLEL CONDUCTORS UNDER 1/0. I HAVE WORKED ON TWO
SCHOOLS AND BOTH PROJECTS HAVE PARALLEL NEUTRAL CONDUCTORS UNDER 1/0. CAN YOU
EXPLAIN THIS? THE BLUE PRINTS ARE ENGINEERED TO USE 200% NEUTRALS FOR PANELS
FEEDING COMPUTERS.
THANKS!

Top
2014 / 2011 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
#76675 - 03/10/01 11:52 AM Re: Parallel conductors
Scott35 Offline

Broom Pusher and
Member

Registered: 10/19/00
Posts: 2724
Loc: Anaheim, CA. USA
Was this the way it was drawn on the single line diagrams, or elsewhere in the Engineered planset [to use paralleled grounded conductors that are smaller than 1/0]??
wonder how that got through plancheck

Must have been the last day before Vacation - both times!

If this is not the way it was drawn up, then it's somebody's conception of an increased ampacity for the grounded conductor [200% of unbalanced load size].

Technically, it shouldn't be an immediate hazard, but it's not within the minimum requirements of the NEC, so that alone makes it something of consern.

I can see a possible change in the future NEC, as to this type of situation. This one wouldn't really have the expected calamity of a typical paralleled feeder. In this case, the ungrounded feeders [subfeed] would be sized correctly [we hope], using only single conductors. The grounded conductor is being supplimented with an additional conductor of equal size, to make the end result ampacity 200% of any single ungrounded conductor.

In other setups, the total amperage is paralleled across the individual feeders, and is protected by an OCPD that exceeds the ampacity of a single conductor by at least 100%.
Here I can see the need to use conductors of 1/0 or larger for overall integrety and strength.

The grounded conductor being supplimented is to cover the highest possible load on that conductor, which exceeds the ampacity of a single conductor. As long as the terminations are solid, the conductors are equal in size, length and type, and the feeder is derated properly for the 5 current carrying conductors - it really doesn't pose any danger as far as I can see. Others may not agree with me, so please post any comments.

I would not say the same if 4 smaller conductors were used to equal the 200% rating of a given ungrounded conductor. That's going back to paralleled conductors, instead of supplimented conductors.

Scott SET
_________________________
Scott " 35 " Thompson
Just Say NO To Green Eggs And Ham!

Top
#76676 - 03/12/01 05:49 AM Re: Parallel conductors
resqcapt19 Offline
Member

Registered: 11/10/00
Posts: 2209
Loc: IL
Bill,
Is this an existing building? 310-4 EX 4 permits grounded conductors #2 and larger to be paralled in EXISTING installations.
Don(resqcapt19)
_________________________
Don(resqcapt19)

Top
#76677 - 03/12/01 10:32 AM Re: Parallel conductors
Glenn Offline
Member

Registered: 01/17/01
Posts: 78
310-4 Ex4;

Under engineering supervision, grounded neutral conductors - - -

Glenn

Top
#76678 - 03/12/01 05:10 PM Re: Parallel conductors
Bill Addiss Offline
Member

Registered: 10/07/00
Posts: 4196
Loc: NY, USA
Don,

This was a question sent in be Email. I don't have any further information. Sorry.

Bill

Top
#76679 - 03/13/01 06:59 AM Re: Parallel conductors
Glenn Offline
Member

Registered: 01/17/01
Posts: 78
The FPN of 310-4 Ex4 seems to give a guide of only on triplen currents.

How much Plant ( location ) load study would involve allowing the Ex 4 to be utilized?

Glenn

Top
#76680 - 03/13/01 02:02 PM Re: Parallel conductors
Glenn Offline
Member

Registered: 01/17/01
Posts: 78
I find several " engineering supervision " 's in the NEC. I do not find a definition.

Did I miss the definition ?

Glenn

Top
#76681 - 03/14/01 03:21 AM Re: Parallel conductors
sparky Offline
Member

Registered: 10/18/00
Posts: 5545
I take it there is a reason, other than an arbitrary choice of 1/0 ,that the NEC is addressing.

I see no "engineering" or "supervision" definition, but as I am the son of an engineer I will give it a shot;

Engineer;
one who can , through factual analysis,pick apart anything in God's material universe down to sub-atomic levels...

( with apologies to Scott here)


Top



ECN Electrical Forums - sponsored by Electrical Contractor Network - Electrical and Code Related Discussion for Electrical Contractors, Electricians, Inspectors, Instructors, Engineers and other related Professionals