ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#60001 - 12/20/05 06:01 PM NEC 645 Might Not be for You
Ron Offline
Member
Registered: 03/13/02
Posts: 582
Loc: White Plains, NY
Link to an interesting article. At least I think so. http://www.csemag.com/article/CA6290839.html
_________________________
Ron
Top
Work Gear for Electricians and the Trades
#60002 - 12/22/05 07:43 PM Re: NEC 645 Might Not be for You
dereckbc Offline
Member
Registered: 10/08/03
Posts: 156
Loc: Tulsa, OK
I hear that Shapiro guy is a real jerk. :> )
Top
#60003 - 12/23/05 01:10 AM Re: NEC 645 Might Not be for You
Trumpy Offline


Member
Registered: 07/05/02
Posts: 8211
Loc: SI,New Zealand
Hey!, that's not very nice.
_________________________
Let's face it, these days if you're not young, you're old - Red Green grin
Top
#60004 - 12/23/05 05:12 AM Re: NEC 645 Might Not be for You
Ron Offline
Member
Registered: 03/13/02
Posts: 582
Loc: White Plains, NY
Right back at ya
Trumpy, When you know where it's coming from, it makes it all alright

[This message has been edited by Ron (edited 12-23-2005).]
_________________________
Ron
Top
#60005 - 12/23/05 06:23 AM Re: NEC 645 Might Not be for You
Bill Addiss Offline
Member
Registered: 10/07/00
Posts: 3875
Loc: NY, USA
Thanks Ron!


Bill
Top
#60006 - 12/23/05 10:51 AM Re: NEC 645 Might Not be for You
dereckbc Offline
Member
Registered: 10/08/03
Posts: 156
Loc: Tulsa, OK
Trumpy relax. That Shapiro guy and I know each other and it was an inside joke between friends. :LOL:
Top
#60007 - 12/23/05 11:10 AM Re: NEC 645 Might Not be for You
jwhite Offline
Member
Registered: 12/01/05
Posts: 64
Loc: Trenton, NC, USA
Where does the author of that article get off saying that only articles 1-4 of the nec are required.

This one statement alone makes me doubt his credibility.
Top
#60008 - 12/23/05 12:11 PM Re: NEC 645 Might Not be for You
Ron Offline
Member
Registered: 03/13/02
Posts: 582
Loc: White Plains, NY
Per 90.3, Chapters 1-4 apply generally to all electrical installations. That makes it mandatory. Chapters 5-8 do not generally apply, and only supplement or modify Chapters 1-4. Chapters 5-8 only apply when that application or equipment arise, so Chapters 5-8 are not mandatory for every situation, only those that they apply.

The statement was in context of the article, to reflect the idea of an optional Article 645.

The entire quote is "First, only chapters 1 through 4 of the NEC are mandatory. Secondly, chapters 5, 6 and 7 apply to special occupancies, special equipment or other special conditions. These chapters describe applications in which certain additional requirements are necessary or in which certain exceptions can be made to the requirements of the previous four chapters."
I think when taken in context of the entire text of the article, the statement is OK.
_________________________
Ron
Top
#60009 - 12/23/05 01:06 PM Re: NEC 645 Might Not be for You
jwhite Offline
Member
Registered: 12/01/05
Posts: 64
Loc: Trenton, NC, USA
I disagree ron,
that should have been better worded. it is very misleading and my be quoted in other than computer room cases.
Top
#60010 - 12/23/05 01:28 PM Re: NEC 645 Might Not be for You
Trumpy Offline


Member
Registered: 07/05/02
Posts: 8211
Loc: SI,New Zealand
Not a problem at all, dereckbc.

That first post of yours certainly made me look twice at the time!.
_________________________
Let's face it, these days if you're not young, you're old - Red Green grin
Top
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >

Member Spotlight
Member Since: 07/05/02
Posts: 8211
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box


Who's Online
0 registered (), 84 Guests and 9 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
 
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
 
Top Posters (30 Days)
Admin 47
HotLine1 43
gfretwell 19
Ruben Rocha 12
Trumpy 9
 
Newest Members
Scotto, Freecrowder, clee512, Jdscott2005, FAIZAN

ECN Electrical Forums - sponsored by Electrical Contractor Network - Electrical and Code Related Discussion for Electrical Contractors, Electricians, Inspectors, Instructors, Engineers and other related Professionals