The Electrical Contractor Network

ECN Electrical Forum
Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

Books, Tools and Test Equipment for Electrical and Construction Trades

Register Now!

Register Now!

We want your input!

Featured:
   

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

   
Recent Posts
Safety at heights?
by gfretwell
01/19/17 07:16 PM
failed home inspection.
by gfretwell
01/19/17 07:03 PM
Webmaster > Admin
by Admin
01/19/17 05:49 PM
Old Bath Fan
by gfretwell
01/19/17 01:38 AM
Search Function
by Admin
01/18/17 11:13 PM
New in the Gallery:
Desk-mounted "power-board"
Top Posters (30 Days)
Admin 32
HotLine1 21
Ruben Rocha 16
gfretwell 15
Trumpy 13
Who's Online
2 registered (Admin, ComputerWizKid), 0 Guests and 191 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#58181 - 11/01/05 05:50 PM Increased EGC size
Redsy Offline
Member

Registered: 03/28/01
Posts: 2138
Loc: Bucks County PA
250.122(B) requires EGCs to be increased proportionally when circuit conductors are increased for voltage drop.
So, although a #10 EGC is good enough for up to a 60 amp ckt., per Table 250.122, if you run a particularly long, 20-amp ckt. and increase the ungrounded conductors to, say #8, you will need to increase the EGC to #8 also.
Any comments, please?

Top
Work Gear for Electricians and the Trades

Work Gear for Electricians and the Trades
Work Gear for Electricians and the Trades
Arc Flash Clothing, Gloves, KneePads, Tool Belts, Pouches, Tool Carriers, etc. etc....

#58182 - 11/01/05 06:00 PM Re: Increased EGC size
iwire Offline
Moderator

Registered: 01/05/03
Posts: 4343
Loc: North Attleboro, MA USA
You summed it up nicely.
_________________________
Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts

Top
#58183 - 11/01/05 06:52 PM Re: Increased EGC size
Redsy Offline
Member

Registered: 03/28/01
Posts: 2138
Loc: Bucks County PA
I'm wondering why a #10 ground is good enough for a 60-amp ckt with #6 circuit conductors, but not good enough for a 20-amp ckt. with #8 circuit conductors.

Top
#58184 - 11/01/05 08:59 PM Re: Increased EGC size
PCBelarge Offline
Member

Registered: 06/08/03
Posts: 657
Loc: Dobbs Ferry, NY, USA
Effective Ground Fault Current Path
_________________________
Pierre Belarge

Top
#58185 - 11/02/05 03:55 AM Re: Increased EGC size
Redsy Offline
Member

Registered: 03/28/01
Posts: 2138
Loc: Bucks County PA
PCB,

If #10 is effective for a 60 amp OCPD, why not for a 20 amp OCPD. I don't believe that the increased resistance due to length will inhibit the operation of the CB.
And if the EGC and circuit conductors need to be matched in size for some concept related to balanced, or equal impedances between circuit conductors and EGCs, why can the EGC be smaller than the circuit conductors in circuits above 30-amp?

Top
#58186 - 11/02/05 04:13 AM Re: Increased EGC size
resqcapt19 Offline
Member

Registered: 11/10/00
Posts: 2209
Loc: IL
Redsy,
How would you write the rule? The EGC does have to increase with the size of the ungrounded conductors, and I don't know of a way to write a rule to accomplish this other than how it is currently written. If you do, it is not too late to submit an online proposal .
Don
_________________________
Don(resqcapt19)

Top
#58187 - 11/02/05 04:48 AM Re: Increased EGC size
Redsy Offline
Member

Registered: 03/28/01
Posts: 2138
Loc: Bucks County PA
Thanks, guys.

I am just wondering if there is some kind of theoretical concept that I am overlooking?

Top
#58188 - 11/02/05 08:25 AM Re: Increased EGC size
C-H Offline


Member

Registered: 09/17/02
Posts: 1508
Loc: Stockholm, Sweden
From a theoretical point of view you want the impedance of the PCBelarge's effective ground fault current path to be low enough to trip the breaker within a reasonable time.

If the 20A breaker is designed to be very forgiving to momentary surges in current while the 60A breaker so to speak is "trigger happy", you could get this counterintuitive result. The breaker manufacturers or their websites can no doubt tell.

[This message has been edited by C-H (edited 11-02-2005).]

[This message has been edited by C-H (edited 11-02-2005).]

Top
#58189 - 11/02/05 08:50 AM Re: Increased EGC size
gfretwell Offline


Member

Registered: 07/20/04
Posts: 9065
Loc: Estero,Fl,usa
I understand the concept but the reality is 2000 feet of #12 would still trip a 20a breaker with a bolted fault, even if it takes 150% (30a) to operate it.
_________________________
Greg Fretwell

Top
#58190 - 11/02/05 10:10 AM Re: Increased EGC size
John Crighton Offline
Member

Registered: 05/16/05
Posts: 172
Loc: Southern California
gfretwell: Yes, the breaker would trip. But in the meantime, the voltage at the point of fault would be higher than if the EGC was sized per the rule, so the shock threat is greater.

Redsy: I know it sounds inconsistent, but I don't think it is. Remember, the reason the EGC was sized up was the long run. If that 60 amp circuit was the same length, it would need a #4 EGC.

Top
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >


ECN Electrical Forums - sponsored by Electrical Contractor Network - Electrical and Code Related Discussion for Electrical Contractors, Electricians, Inspectors, Instructors, Engineers and other related Professionals