ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
Admin 19
Recent Posts
Anyone hiring inspectors?
by gfretwell. 03/27/17 01:36 AM
Old decora style outlets
by Admin. 03/25/17 11:40 AM
ESA Arc flash course
by TheShockDoctors. 03/24/17 10:15 AM
fuse rejectors
by HotLine1. 03/24/17 07:53 AM
Another Forum Update
by Admin. 03/22/17 03:04 PM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
231,551 Are you busy
166,289 Re: Forum
160,676 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 43 guests, and 10 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
#55544 - 09/01/05 01:12 PM Is this a Feeder?  
GovtVoltage  Offline
Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 20
Sudbury,MA
Is the Conductors for a Sub-Panel considered a Feeder and are we subsequently able to use Table 310.15(B)(6) to calculate our wire size?


Work Gear for Electricians and the Trades

#55545 - 09/01/05 02:50 PM Re: Is this a Feeder?  
gfretwell  Offline


Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,059
Estero,Fl,usa
You can only use 310.15(B)(6) if this is the feeder to the entire dwelling load, like the feeder from an outside main disconnect to the main panel inside the house. A sub panel off the main is sized with 310.16.
It has to do with load diversity.


Greg Fretwell

#55546 - 09/01/05 05:59 PM Re: Is this a Feeder?  
Tom  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,044
Shinnston, WV USA
Table 310.15(B)(6) is one of the areas of the code that can cause a fistfight to break out. While I am in complete agreement with the post from Gfretwell, there are many parts of the country where this is not enforced this way and you would be able to use the table for your feeder. If your work is subject to inspection, it is best (as always) to consult with the AHJ prior to commencing work.

Tom


Few things are harder to put up with than the annoyance of a good example.

#55547 - 09/01/05 06:21 PM Re: Is this a Feeder?  
Roger  Offline
Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,716
N.C.
I agree with Greg and Tom, 310.16

Roger


#55548 - 09/01/05 08:36 PM Re: Is this a Feeder?  
GovtVoltage  Offline
Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 20
Sudbury,MA
Thanks for the reply guys......


#55549 - 09/03/05 06:53 AM Re: Is this a Feeder?  
iwire  Offline
Moderator
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
North Attleboro, MA USA
And I say do away with Table 310.15(B)(6) to make the NEC smaller and with less sections of confusion. [Linked Image]

Is using 310.16 that outrageously expensive?

Bob


Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts

#55550 - 09/03/05 09:54 AM Re: Is this a Feeder?  
winnie  Offline
Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 649
boston, ma
Given what copper prices are doing, every little bit helps.

On the other hand, reduced resistance in feeders means more efficient deliver of power to the load, and lower lifetime costs. If you take the 'Copper Development Association' at their word, you'd be upsizing from 310.16 by a size or two anyway. [Linked Image]

On the left foot, I'd rather do away with 310.15, and instead change the calculations for service size to give a _separate_ result for conductor ampacity and required OCPD, in much the same way that oversized OCPD can be used with a given conductor ampacity for specific loads such as motors or welders.

-Jon



Member Spotlight
Lostazhell
Lostazhell
Bakersfield, CA (Originally Orange Co.)
Posts: 1,428
Joined: February 2004
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.020s Queries: 14 (0.003s) Memory: 0.7823 MB (Peak: 0.9330 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-03-27 08:39:04 UTC