ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
Admin 19
Recent Posts
fuse rejectors
by NORCAL. 03/29/17 01:44 AM
Old decora style outlets
by NORCAL. 03/29/17 01:41 AM
NFPA stuff
by gfretwell. 03/28/17 08:08 PM
Anyone hiring inspectors?
by HotLine1. 03/27/17 08:03 AM
ESA Arc flash course
by TheShockDoctors. 03/24/17 10:15 AM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
231,734 Are you busy
166,637 Re: Forum
160,788 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 63 guests, and 13 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
#50343 - 03/30/05 10:10 PM NM cable vs. Megger  
Redsy  Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,056
Bucks County PA
A home experienced a surge due to a downed power line.
The surge traveled through the branch circuit that feeds a 110 volt gas dryer and other receptacle outlets on the same circuit(it is an older city home without a dedicated laundry circuit) and resulted in an arc from the dryer receptacle to the nearby gas line. No fire, just soot marks.
The insurance company wants to know if the branch circuit wiring is compromised.
Using a megger, I get 250,000 ohms
(1/4 megohm) between hot & ground.
I believe the rule of thumb is 1 megohm plus 1 more megohm for every 1,000 volts.
I think I should recommend replacement of the branch circuit wiring.
Any thoughts?


Work Gear for Electricians and the Trades

#50344 - 03/30/05 11:03 PM Re: NM cable vs. Megger  
Zapped  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 482
Huntington Beach, CA, USA
I agree. I would replace the branch wiring at least.


#50345 - 03/31/05 12:32 AM Re: NM cable vs. Megger  
PCBelarge  Offline
Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 681
Dobbs Ferry, NY, USA
Redsy
I also agree that the reading is too low and you should replace the affected wiring.


Pierre Belarge

#50346 - 03/31/05 07:47 AM Re: NM cable vs. Megger  
pauluk  Offline
Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 7,520
Norfolk, England
Agreed. If the cable were in good shape I would expect a reading much higher than this (certainly up in the tens of megohms region).


#50347 - 03/31/05 08:58 AM Re: NM cable vs. Megger  
Redsy  Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,056
Bucks County PA
Thanks for the quick help guys.
Much appreciated!


#50348 - 03/31/05 10:46 PM Re: NM cable vs. Megger  
highkvoltage  Offline
Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 34
Massillon, Ohio, USA
Redsy. I agree with the other posters but only if you preformed the test with all the proper precautions.
1.Was the romex cleaned correctly to remove the carbon residue? Since carbon will effect your reading.
2. Was you able to strip back a small amount of the romex? Sometimes you can cut off the first 3/4" to 1" and will change your reading.
3. What was you testing voltage? This would depend on what your insulation value is, normally 600V. I usually will not exceed 1000V even though you could test to 3000.
The problem with using a megger most don't go to the proper training school/seminar and learned from an old timer thats been doing for years and really didn't know what he was doing, then end up doing work that is not needed because the proper test proceedures were not followed. I am not saying you don't know the proceedures just some helpful advise.



Member Spotlight
BEAMEUP
BEAMEUP
WA
Posts: 27
Joined: December 2004
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.016s Queries: 14 (0.003s) Memory: 0.7733 MB (Peak: 0.9157 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-03-29 13:20:34 UTC