The Electrical Contractor Network

ECN Electrical Forum
Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

Books, Tools and Test Equipment for Electrical and Construction Trades

Register Now!

Register Now!

We want your input!

Featured:
   

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

   
Recent Posts
Industrail Control Panel bonding per 409.108
by sparkyinak
Yesterday at 06:29 PM
Calling all Non-US members!! (Non-US only)
by aussie240
12/07/16 02:39 AM
Photo Upload Tutorial
by DanK
12/06/16 11:35 PM
Sprinklered equipment 26-008
by bigpapa
12/02/16 04:24 PM
On Delay Relay with Auto Reset
by Potseal
12/01/16 09:59 AM
New in the Gallery:
12.5A through 0.75mm˛ flex (just out of curiosity)
Shout Box

Top Posters (30 Days)
gfretwell 13
HotLine1 10
sparkyinak 9
Texas_Ranger 8
Potseal 6
Who's Online
0 registered (), 194 Guests and 4 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 >
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#50313 - 03/30/05 12:20 PM Smoke Detector Liability
GovtVoltage Offline
Member

Registered: 04/24/03
Posts: 20
Loc: Sudbury,MA
Hey guys, listen to this story. Something to definitely think about. I went for my Code Refresher last Summer(last available before the deadline,as usual). Been thinking about this a lot.

We had a speaker come in to talk about Smoke Detectors and other fire related issues such as Fire wall Penetrations.

Short story long.......The story goes as this....Joe Sparky does electrical work to include Hard Wired Smokes in single family residence.

Middle of the night they go off. Woman who was on second floor in bed looks around....nothing. Goes to first floor......nothing. They are still going off, so she opens the basement door and she is overcome by smoke and she dies in the fire.

The electrician was found liable.

The reason: He did not "brief" the homeowner that when the smokes activated, you are supposed to leave the house immediately. The instructions with the smokes supposedly address this.

Most of us thought this was common sense, but the guy said it was a true story. God Bless the Lawyers.

Top
Work Gear for Electricians and the Trades

Work Gear for Electricians and the Trades
Work Gear for Electricians and the Trades
Arc Flash Clothing, Gloves, KneePads, Tool Belts, Pouches, Tool Carriers, etc. etc....

#50314 - 03/30/05 01:06 PM Re: Smoke Detector Liability
earlydean Offline
Member

Registered: 12/22/03
Posts: 749
Loc: Griswold, CT, USA
I find this story impossible to believe.
_________________________
Earl

Top
#50315 - 03/30/05 01:32 PM Re: Smoke Detector Liability
pdh Offline
Member

Registered: 01/20/05
Posts: 354
Having seen a number of really screwed up court rulings, some by juries, and some bu judges, I find it entirely plausible to believe one or two cases like this really could happen. Others equally stupid really have happened.

Top
#50316 - 03/30/05 02:20 PM Re: Smoke Detector Liability
Dnkldorf Offline
Member

Registered: 12/12/04
Posts: 1091
Loc: nowhere usa
How did the courts know, he did not brief her?

She's dead.......

Top
#50317 - 03/30/05 02:36 PM Re: Smoke Detector Liability
Electricmanscott Offline
Member

Registered: 01/12/02
Posts: 1478
Loc: Holden, MA USA
No way is this true. NO WAY!

Top
#50318 - 03/30/05 03:51 PM Re: Smoke Detector Liability
SolarPowered Offline
Member

Registered: 07/05/04
Posts: 615
Loc: Palo Alto, CA, USA
I agree with Dnkldorf. While I can believe that the courts and juries are stupid enough to make such a ruling, how do they know she went searching around the second floor, and then around the first floor, and then to the basement? And how do they know the electrician didn't brief her? She didn't tell them--she's dead. So the story just isn't credible, as least as it's told.

Top
#50319 - 03/30/05 03:57 PM Re: Smoke Detector Liability
Roger Offline
Member

Registered: 05/18/02
Posts: 1779
Loc: N.C.
I go with Dnkldorf too.

Although, in todays world, I would not say it is impossible for a jury to find this way.

GovtVoltage, welcome to the forum.


Roger

[This message has been edited by Roger (edited 03-30-2005).]

Top
#50320 - 03/30/05 04:01 PM Re: Smoke Detector Liability
iwire Offline
Moderator

Registered: 01/05/03
Posts: 4343
Loc: North Attleboro, MA USA
I would not be all that surprised if this was true.

Logic has little to do with jury decisions.

Burnt by a hot cup of coffee and win money.

Take a look at some of the cases on this web site.

http://www.power-of-attorneys.com/StupidLawsuit.htm
_________________________
Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts

Top
#50321 - 03/30/05 04:56 PM Re: Smoke Detector Liability
Electricmanscott Offline
Member

Registered: 01/12/02
Posts: 1478
Loc: Holden, MA USA
I can't look at that web site as I will become infuriated. Stuff like that really gets me. Almost as much as a dopey idea like charging you a toll to drive into the City of Boston. No, not a toll on a particular road or bridge (ridiculous enough) a toll to enter the city itself. Friggin brilliant.

Top
#50322 - 03/30/05 05:01 PM Re: Smoke Detector Liability
Roger Offline
Member

Registered: 05/18/02
Posts: 1779
Loc: N.C.
Scott, common sense died and rational thinking is in bad shape.

Roger

Top
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 >



ECN Electrical Forums - sponsored by Electrical Contractor Network - Electrical and Code Related Discussion for Electrical Contractors, Electricians, Inspectors, Instructors, Engineers and other related Professionals