ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
Admin 19
Recent Posts
fuse rejectors
by NORCAL. 03/29/17 01:44 AM
Old decora style outlets
by NORCAL. 03/29/17 01:41 AM
NFPA stuff
by gfretwell. 03/28/17 08:08 PM
Anyone hiring inspectors?
by HotLine1. 03/27/17 08:03 AM
ESA Arc flash course
by TheShockDoctors. 03/24/17 10:15 AM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
231,704 Are you busy
166,609 Re: Forum
160,776 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 53 guests, and 11 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
#47480 - 01/17/05 04:52 PM Standard vs Optional Calculation  
GamecockEE  Offline
Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 49
Georgetown, SC 29440
Just wanted to see what the most popular method is for calculating the service load for residential installations, the standard or optional. It seems to me that the standard calculation is more conservative. Has that been your experience out there?


Work Gear for Electricians and the Trades

#47481 - 01/17/05 06:28 PM Re: Standard vs Optional Calculation  
Bob  Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 182
Mobile, AL, USA
There are requirements t hat must be met listed in 220.30A before you can use the optional method. You project may not meet the requirements.

[This message has been edited by Bob (edited 01-17-2005).]


#47482 - 01/17/05 09:50 PM Re: Standard vs Optional Calculation  
The Watt Doctor  Offline
Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 435
Mont Belvieu, TX
Hey EE,
I've done it both ways in the past. I'm not sure what you mean by [e]conservative[/e], but I've found that most of the time the standard calculation results in a larger service. I haven't done any of these calculations, with the exception of my own house, in years. I used the standard calculation on my house. It seems like there were a few times when the optional method resulted in a larger service, but not very often.

Wattologically Yours,
Doc


The Watt Doctor
Altura Cogen
Channelview, TX

#47483 - 01/17/05 10:07 PM Re: Standard vs Optional Calculation  
Ryan_J  Offline
Moderator
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,374
West Jordan, Utah, USA
As an inspector, I never see the standard method used. My experience is the same as Doc's, which is that the optional method results in a smaller service/feeder.


Ryan Jackson,
Salt Lake City

#47484 - 01/18/05 09:24 AM Re: Standard vs Optional Calculation  
GamecockEE  Offline
Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 49
Georgetown, SC 29440
What I meant by conservative is that the calculated service size would be larger using the standard method vs the optional method. From the perspective of a practicing EE who worries about liability issues, and often not knowing exactly what the appliance and heating/air cond. ratings are, or how they might get changed during the construction phase, it seemed prudent to me to use the more conservative method, better safe than sorry. I wanted to see which method the experience base out there is using.


#47485 - 01/19/05 12:45 PM Re: Standard vs Optional Calculation  
The Watt Doctor  Offline
Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 435
Mont Belvieu, TX
Practicing EE,
Looks like we are on the same page.
Regards,
Doc


The Watt Doctor
Altura Cogen
Channelview, TX


Member Spotlight
dougwells
dougwells
kamloops BC Canada
Posts: 1,137
Joined: May 2003
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.015s Queries: 14 (0.003s) Memory: 0.7735 MB (Peak: 0.9168 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-03-29 07:23:12 UTC