ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#47480 - 01/17/05 12:52 PM Standard vs Optional Calculation
GamecockEE Offline
Member
Registered: 07/28/04
Posts: 49
Loc: Georgetown, SC 29440
Just wanted to see what the most popular method is for calculating the service load for residential installations, the standard or optional. It seems to me that the standard calculation is more conservative. Has that been your experience out there?
Top
Work Gear for Electricians and the Trades
#47481 - 01/17/05 02:28 PM Re: Standard vs Optional Calculation
Bob Offline
Member
Registered: 02/05/02
Posts: 182
Loc: Mobile, AL, USA
There are requirements t hat must be met listed in 220.30A before you can use the optional method. You project may not meet the requirements.

[This message has been edited by Bob (edited 01-17-2005).]
Top
#47482 - 01/17/05 05:50 PM Re: Standard vs Optional Calculation
The Watt Doctor Offline
Member
Registered: 12/23/01
Posts: 435
Loc: Mont Belvieu, TX
Hey EE,
I've done it both ways in the past. I'm not sure what you mean by [e]conservative[/e], but I've found that most of the time the standard calculation results in a larger service. I haven't done any of these calculations, with the exception of my own house, in years. I used the standard calculation on my house. It seems like there were a few times when the optional method resulted in a larger service, but not very often.

Wattologically Yours,
Doc
_________________________
The Watt Doctor
Altura Cogen
Channelview, TX
Top
#47483 - 01/17/05 06:07 PM Re: Standard vs Optional Calculation
Ryan_J Offline
Moderator
Registered: 08/19/03
Posts: 1374
Loc: West Jordan, Utah, USA
As an inspector, I never see the standard method used. My experience is the same as Doc's, which is that the optional method results in a smaller service/feeder.
_________________________
Ryan Jackson,
Salt Lake City
Top
#47484 - 01/18/05 05:24 AM Re: Standard vs Optional Calculation
GamecockEE Offline
Member
Registered: 07/28/04
Posts: 49
Loc: Georgetown, SC 29440
What I meant by conservative is that the calculated service size would be larger using the standard method vs the optional method. From the perspective of a practicing EE who worries about liability issues, and often not knowing exactly what the appliance and heating/air cond. ratings are, or how they might get changed during the construction phase, it seemed prudent to me to use the more conservative method, better safe than sorry. I wanted to see which method the experience base out there is using.
Top
#47485 - 01/19/05 08:45 AM Re: Standard vs Optional Calculation
The Watt Doctor Offline
Member
Registered: 12/23/01
Posts: 435
Loc: Mont Belvieu, TX
Practicing EE,
Looks like we are on the same page.
Regards,
Doc
_________________________
The Watt Doctor
Altura Cogen
Channelview, TX
Top

Member Spotlight
Member Since: 07/05/02
Posts: 8211
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box


Who's Online
0 registered (), 44 Guests and 9 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
 
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
 
Top Posters (30 Days)
Admin 47
HotLine1 43
gfretwell 19
Ruben Rocha 12
Trumpy 9
 
Newest Members
Scotto, Freecrowder, clee512, Jdscott2005, FAIZAN

ECN Electrical Forums - sponsored by Electrical Contractor Network - Electrical and Code Related Discussion for Electrical Contractors, Electricians, Inspectors, Instructors, Engineers and other related Professionals