ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
Admin 16
Recent Posts
Another Forum Update
by Admin. 03/22/17 03:04 PM
Dining room plugs
by watersparkfalls. 03/21/17 10:31 PM
TRUE POWER
by jraef. 03/21/17 09:13 PM
WEG CFW-11 Frequency Inverter
by jraef. 03/21/17 08:50 PM
fuse rejectors
by HotLine1. 03/20/17 08:14 PM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
231,152 Are you busy
165,898 Re: Forum
160,446 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 51 guests, and 13 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
#27107 - 07/02/03 12:38 AM public record  
ga.sparky56  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 558
young harris georgia usa
In light of the recent court decision in Texas,what impact will this have on the NEC?

Will we see each state putting it's own stamp on a version of the NEC,and further add to the questions of who allows what and where?

Will we even have a true NEC for the basis?


Work Gear for Electricians and the Trades

#27108 - 07/02/03 06:40 AM Re: public record  
pauluk  Offline
Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 7,520
Norfolk, England
Russell,

What exactly was the Tx court case?


#27109 - 07/02/03 08:54 AM Re: public record  
resqcapt19  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
IL
Paul,
The 5th Circuit of the US Court of Appeals has ruled that if a "model" code is adopted as law, then it can be freely published online without infringing the copyright laws. Here is the court's opinion . Note that this ruling only applies to the 5th circuit, which covers the states of Texas, Mississippi, and Louisiana. Courts in other areas may cite this case, but the ruling in the 5th circuit, does not automatically prevent copyright infringement law suits against those who publish copyrighted codes online in areas outside of the 5th Circuit. The ruling was appealed to the US Supreme Court, but they declined to review the case.
Don

[This message has been edited by resqcapt19 (edited 07-02-2003).]

[This message has been edited by resqcapt19 (edited 07-17-2003).]


Don(resqcapt19)

#27110 - 07/02/03 08:57 AM Re: public record  
resqcapt19  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
IL
In my opinion, most code users will still purchase the code books. Few could work with only an online copy. The ruling does not say that the code books must be free. If fewer copies of the book are actually sold, the cost may have to go up so that the sponsoring organization can recover their costs.
Don


Don(resqcapt19)

#27111 - 07/02/03 05:58 PM Re: public record  
ga.sparky56  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 558
young harris georgia usa
I know I'm a bit simple-minded,but wouldn't it be easier for all concerned to make the Nec exactly what it says and have 1 code nationwide?

Russell


#27112 - 07/02/03 06:38 PM Re: public record  
Roger  Offline
Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,716
N.C.
Hey Russell, I question your simple-mindedness, but the word "simple" does come to play. Your idea would never work because it would be "simple" and practical. [Linked Image]

Roger


#27113 - 07/02/03 06:54 PM Re: public record  
HotLine1  Offline


Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,798
Brick, NJ USA
Russell:
WE have the NEC available at most of our libraries here in NJ. Also, the town that I work in PT as an AHJ has a copy of the NEC, and Handbook available at the Construction Office Permit counter. Most of the other towns will provide a NEC, IF someone asks for it. (Not to "take" but to read as reference)

Occasionally, I have given homeowners "copies" of outlet spacing requirements, and EC's copies of emergency lighting references. I may be "violating" the copyright law, then again I may not be.

BTW:
NJ "adopts" the NEC (with amendments) as the Electrical Sub-Code for the State Uniform Construction Code. THe State does not "re-print" the NEC into it's UCC books. THe UCC Blue Book is available at ALL town Construction Offices, but I do not believe the general public can buy it. (That may be wrong) It is very boring reading, as it is a "legal document" (Law) and mostly written in "legaliese".
John

[This message has been edited by HotLine1 (edited 07-02-2003).]


John

#27114 - 07/02/03 07:07 PM Re: public record  
ga.sparky56  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 558
young harris georgia usa
One potential problem I could see with the Nec free online,is that homeowners will download it and start argueing code issues,whether they know what they're reading or not.

Can anyone else see this or am I being paranoid?


Russell


#27115 - 07/02/03 07:50 PM Re: public record  
ThinkGood  Offline
Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,081
Milwaukee, WI


#27116 - 07/02/03 08:10 PM Re: public record  
resqcapt19  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
IL
Russ,
Quote
I know I'm a bit simple-minded,but wouldn't it be easier for all concerned to make the Nec exactly what it says and have 1 code nationwide?

Can't be done. The adoption of building codes by the federal government would be unconstitutional. That type of legislation is reserved to state and local governments. Of course with Ashcroft in power who knows what rights the federal government will trample on next.
Don


Don(resqcapt19)

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

Member Spotlight
RonKipperDatacom
RonKipperDatacom
Kansas City, KS
Posts: 30
Joined: January 2013
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.019s Queries: 15 (0.003s) Memory: 0.8174 MB (Peak: 0.9902 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-03-23 02:06:09 UTC