ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
Admin 19
Recent Posts
fuse rejectors
by NORCAL. 03/29/17 01:44 AM
Old decora style outlets
by NORCAL. 03/29/17 01:41 AM
NFPA stuff
by gfretwell. 03/28/17 08:08 PM
Anyone hiring inspectors?
by HotLine1. 03/27/17 08:03 AM
ESA Arc flash course
by TheShockDoctors. 03/24/17 10:15 AM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
231,894 Are you busy
166,769 Re: Forum
160,885 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 98 guests, and 10 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#22085 - 02/17/03 11:22 PM Receptacles  
Anonymous
Unregistered

A receptacle is required within 6 feet of a door opening: Lets say you have a door swing covering one side of a wall (entry door), and on the other side, you have a closet with a door swing covering the opposite side of the wall. Fort he remainder--you have open air. What do you do now?


Work Gear for Electricians and the Trades

#22086 - 02/17/03 11:44 PM Re: Receptacles  
Electric Eagle  Offline
Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 914
Alpharetta, GA
When in doubt, be conservative and put in a recep.


#22087 - 02/18/03 09:27 AM Re: Receptacles  
Electricmanscott  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,457
Holden, MA USA
The NEC does not exclude wall space that falls behind the door. I know this may be argued but it is pretty clear to me. You need a receptacle there if the wall is 24'' or wider.


#22088 - 02/18/03 10:05 AM Re: Receptacles  
spyder  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 210
Massachusetts
Scott is right. 2ft or wider you need the recp. Also close the door and you have a great recp to plug a vaccuum into. The recp will never be blocked by furniture.


#22089 - 02/18/03 12:06 PM Re: Receptacles  
George  Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 375
Foca Se ----

Remember the code is perscriptive. A homeowner has the right to say it is not necessary. A spec builder has less right.

I cannot imagine a AHJ red tagging the lack of a recept.


#22090 - 02/18/03 12:14 PM Re: Receptacles  
Jim M  Offline
Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 457
Chestertown, MD, USA
George,

I think your statement about the homeowner overriding the NEC is ludacris (sp). If this was the case what would prevent them from saying they don't want any of the safeguards that the code requires? After all it is their life, maybe they don't want to play in the gene pool? What about the next person to buy the house? Wouldn't this allow the homeowner to overrule the AHJ?

Sorry for the rant but I disagree strongly.


#22091 - 02/18/03 01:45 PM Re: Receptacles  
iwire  Offline
Moderator
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
North Attleboro, MA USA
I agree with Jim, at least in the states I work the homeowner can not "override" the code, here in MA if a homeowner wants to do their own work they are required to pull a permit, get inspections and follow the amended NEC just like a qualified person.
Bob

[This message has been edited by iwire (edited 02-18-2003).]


Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts

#22092 - 02/18/03 05:06 PM Re: Receptacles  
HotLine1  Offline


Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,803
Brick, NJ USA
The NEC cannot be "overridden" by the homeowner, builder etc. The NEC is the minimum required, and the 6-12" rule (and 24" min) are required receptacle locations in a resi job. (Excluding the "rehab" codes in states that have them)

John


John

#22093 - 02/18/03 09:15 PM Re: Receptacles  
George  Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 375
As I recall the 12' rule does not apply in many places in a residence, laundry rooms, halls, bathrooms, ...

As I recall it applies to only the specific room types listed in the code.

As I recall a home office is not one of the rooms where the 12' rule applies. (It could look identical to a bedroom.)

As a building inspector are you going to go to court and argue that the 12' rule is important to safety in some rooms but not others? And in this case inparticular?

Those are foolish arguments.


#22094 - 02/19/03 02:13 AM Re: Receptacles  
Anonymous
Unregistered

TY for the responses!


Page 1 of 2 1 2

Member Spotlight
dougwells
dougwells
kamloops BC Canada
Posts: 1,137
Joined: May 2003
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.017s Queries: 15 (0.004s) Memory: 0.8115 MB (Peak: 0.9872 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-03-30 20:24:43 UTC