The Electrical Contractor Network

ECN Electrical Forum
Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

Books, Tools and Test Equipment for Electrical and Construction Trades

Register Now!

Register Now!

We want your input!

Featured:
   

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

   
Recent Posts
Temporarily feeding a panel...
by Potseal
09/29/16 01:29 PM
Locked rotor, no burnout
by jraef
09/29/16 01:18 PM
Massive power outage South Australia
by Meadow
09/29/16 06:46 AM
short circuit??
by Meadow
09/29/16 06:43 AM
Norwegian power?
by Meadow
09/29/16 06:36 AM
New in the Gallery:
12.5A through 0.75mm˛ flex (just out of curiosity)
Shout Box

Top Posters (30 Days)
HotLine1 13
sparky 10
sparky66wv 8
gfretwell 8
Vlado 6
Who's Online
3 registered (Potseal, gfretwell, jraef), 103 Guests and 4 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#216947 - 03/18/16 11:51 AM 110.26(E)
triple Offline
Member

Registered: 04/01/02
Posts: 182
Loc: Wisconsin
Since most large switchboards placed along a wall tend to be positioned at least a few inches off/away from said wall, does the code allow foreign equipment to be mounted within this gap and under 6' above the electrical equipment? Tecnically, nothing placed within this gap would be within the "footprint" of the gear. Obviously, at some point, the gap does become large enough for other trades to use. Is it one inch, three inches, one foot? Can the AHJ say that even 18" isn't enough?

Top
2014 / 2011 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
#216948 - 03/18/16 01:12 PM Re: 110.26(E) [Re: triple]
ghost307 Offline
Member

Registered: 05/09/05
Posts: 876
Loc: Chicago Illinois USA
Check with your AHJ.
I know that although Chicago says no (because they prohibit foreign items within the footprint and the associated working space); it is allowed in other cities.
_________________________
Ghost307

Top
#216954 - 03/18/16 10:37 PM Re: 110.26(E) [Re: triple]
triple Offline
Member

Registered: 04/01/02
Posts: 182
Loc: Wisconsin
The working space is only in front of the type of equipment I am referring to. For equipment requiring working space behind it, the unit would not be allowed to be placed up against a wall. Sorry, I don't think I described the situation very clearly.

Top
#216956 - 03/19/16 09:10 AM Re: 110.26(E) [Re: triple]
ghost307 Offline
Member

Registered: 05/09/05
Posts: 876
Loc: Chicago Illinois USA
I really think the AHJ needs to weigh in on this.
A drain line behind the equipment will cause few problems, a water line could sweat or break, a gas line is a hazard next to electrical equipment.
You also have to consider how you would repair/replace something that is rendered inaccessible after installation.
The 2 of you need to go over the specifics of this installation...I doubt that there is a universal answer to this.
_________________________
Ghost307

Top
#216957 - 03/19/16 10:53 AM Re: 110.26(E) [Re: triple]
triple Offline
Member

Registered: 04/01/02
Posts: 182
Loc: Wisconsin
1) The area I am referring to is above the equipment, within six feet vertically of its top, but behind the footprint. If the equipment were 6' from the wall instead of 4" then there would definately be no problem with anything foreign being installed there.
2) Nothing is rendered inaccessible. Again, I must not have described the scenario well. Nothing has been placed directly behind the switchgear. It it above but behind the footprint.

Top
#216970 - 03/21/16 06:34 AM Re: 110.26(E) [Re: triple]
ampherder Offline
Member

Registered: 09/29/11
Posts: 18
Loc: VA
The way 110.26(E) is worded, there would be nothing prohibiting what you describe. The AHJ can always choose to rule differently.

Top
#216976 - 03/22/16 06:57 AM Re: 110.26(E) [Re: triple]
HotLine1 Offline

Member

Registered: 04/03/02
Posts: 6785
Loc: Brick, NJ USA
IMHO, it would depend on the proposed 'foreign' item is. Any 'item' that may 'leak' or cause any type of damage to the gear would be a "No", unless protection of the gear could be maintained.

The best solution to your inquiry would be a discussion with the local AHJ.
_________________________
John

Top
#216977 - 03/22/16 07:57 AM Re: 110.26(E) [Re: triple]
ghost307 Offline
Member

Registered: 05/09/05
Posts: 876
Loc: Chicago Illinois USA
Agreed.
I had a major switchgear installation where the Contractor took a short cut and routed the incoming natural gas line over the gear.
His response to the AHJ's objection was to put a drip pan underneath the gas pipe.

As the old adage goes...you can't fix stupid.
_________________________
Ghost307

Top



ECN Electrical Forums - sponsored by Electrical Contractor Network - Electrical and Code Related Discussion for Electrical Contractors, Electricians, Inspectors, Instructors, Engineers and other related Professionals