ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
Admin 16
Recent Posts
fuse rejectors
by TheShockDoctors. 03/23/17 12:15 PM
Another Forum Update
by Admin. 03/22/17 03:04 PM
Dining room plugs
by watersparkfalls. 03/21/17 10:31 PM
TRUE POWER
by jraef. 03/21/17 09:13 PM
WEG CFW-11 Frequency Inverter
by jraef. 03/21/17 08:50 PM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
231,236 Are you busy
165,946 Re: Forum
160,475 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
1 registered members (TheShockDoctors), 95 guests, and 15 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
#21321 - 02/01/03 11:02 AM We Have a Code!  
rowdyrudy  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 169
Mascoutah, IL USA
Meeting started @ 2:30 P.M. and didn't end until 7:30 P.M. Concessions were made by proponents and opponents. The insurance folks were a great aid as well as FD people. The enabling regulation passed and the modified code becomes effective for permits issued on or after 03/01/2003. There are still a few issues to resolve but I think the groundwork has been established. I especially like some wording added by one of the committee members. "Irregardless of challenged interpretations of this ordinance, common sense shall be the governing factor in all decisions relating to electrical installations for dewlling units".
I love it!
Rowdy


Work Gear for Electricians and the Trades

#21322 - 02/01/03 11:20 AM Re: We Have a Code!  
Joe Tedesco  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Boston, Massachusetts USA
rowdyrudy

CONGRATULATIONS!!!

"Irregardless of challenged interpretations of this ordinance, common sense shall be the governing factor in all decisions relating to electrical installations for dewlling units".


This should become a rule in SECTION 90.1 IN THE NEC!!


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant

#21323 - 02/01/03 12:23 PM Re: We Have a Code!  
Bill Addiss  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,875
NY, USA
Rowdy,

Congratulations!

Where can I read up on this "Common Sense" thing?

[Linked Image]
Bill


#21324 - 02/01/03 02:28 PM Re: We Have a Code!  
bobp  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 70
Puyallup, WA, USA
Rowdy,

I don't believe there is such a word as "irregardless".

Bob


#21325 - 02/01/03 03:55 PM Re: We Have a Code!  
Joe Tedesco  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Boston, Massachusetts USA
Please let us know where and if we can read the full report on the adoption of the Code.

[This message has been edited by Joe Tedesco (edited 02-03-2003).]


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant

#21326 - 02/02/03 10:58 PM Re: We Have a Code!  
HotLine1  Offline


Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,798
Brick, NJ USA
Rudy:
Congratulations!!!
Sometimes results are obtained thru hard work.
John


John

#21327 - 02/03/03 03:15 AM Re: We Have a Code!  
ThinkGood  Offline
Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,081
Milwaukee, WI
Quote
Irregardless is in the www.dictionary.com

However, jackalope is not. Snipe is, though.

Congrats, rowdyrudy.

[This message has been edited by ThinkGood (edited 02-03-2003).]


#21328 - 02/03/03 07:42 AM Re: We Have a Code!  
sparky  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,303
Rowdy,
you rode the beuracratic bull & made good !
congrats!
[Linked Image]


#21329 - 02/03/03 08:18 AM Re: We Have a Code!  
Gwz  Offline
Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 197
Who determines what is ' common sense ' ?

Appears to me that when someone asks " Is it a safe installation ? " when NEC sections are quoted as being violated, that NEC 90.1(A) and 90.1(B) should over-rule the ' common sense ' plea.

Yes, the NEC is not a perfect document, and where the NEC is not clear, then, 'common sense' by knowledgeable 'electrical people' should be sought.

It is my opinion that the NEC is an excellant document.

Glenn


#21330 - 02/03/03 02:56 PM Re: We Have a Code!  
bobp  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 70
Puyallup, WA, USA
From Merriam-Webster unabrdiged Dictionary;


Main Entry: ir·re·gard·less
Pronunciation: "ir-i-'gärd-l&s
Function: adverb
Etymology: probably blend of irrespective and regardless
Date: circa 1912
nonstandard : REGARDLESS
usage Irregardless originated in dialectal American speech in the early 20th century. Its fairly widespread use in speech called it to the attention of usage commentators as early as 1927. The most frequently repeated remark about it is that "there is no such word." There is such a word, however. It is still used primarily in speech, although it can be found from time to time in edited prose. Its reputation has not risen over the years, and it is still a long way from general acceptance. Use regardless instead.

Even though they say to use regardless, you are right there is such a word. Mea culpa..

Bob



Member Spotlight
HotLine1
HotLine1
Brick, NJ USA
Posts: 6,798
Joined: April 2002
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.024s Queries: 14 (0.005s) Memory: 0.8074 MB (Peak: 0.9822 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-03-23 16:23:37 UTC