The Electrical Contractor Network

ECN Electrical Forum
Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

Books, Tools and Test Equipment for Electrical and Construction Trades

Register Now!

Register Now!

We want your input!

Featured:
   

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

   
Recent Posts
Correct rotation, wrong sequence
by Potseal
Yesterday at 03:14 PM
Industrail Control Panel bonding per 409.108
by sparkyinak
12/09/16 06:29 PM
Calling all Non-US members!! (Non-US only)
by aussie240
12/07/16 02:39 AM
Photo Upload Tutorial
by DanK
12/06/16 11:35 PM
Sprinklered equipment 26-008
by bigpapa
12/02/16 04:24 PM
New in the Gallery:
12.5A through 0.75mm˛ flex (just out of curiosity)
Shout Box

Top Posters (30 Days)
gfretwell 11
HotLine1 10
Potseal 9
sparkyinak 8
Texas_Ranger 7
Who's Online
0 registered (), 224 Guests and 5 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#212834 - 02/19/14 07:36 AM Tap Rules or not?
George Little Offline
Member

Registered: 01/18/04
Posts: 1492
Loc: Michigan USA
Here's the setting: We have a 400a. fused Service switch with double barrel lugs on the load side feeding two 200a. panels containing a 200a. main in each one. The wire supplying the 400a. switch are rated for 400a. and the wires feeding the 200a. panels are rated for 200a. I maintain that all wires are protected at their ampacity and that this is a common installation. This would be comparable to the rules for taps found in 240.21 where conductors are protected at their load ends instead of their source. My learned colleagues say "Can't do that, it ain't a tap" What say you guys?
_________________________
George Little

Top
2014 / 2011 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
#212835 - 02/19/14 09:35 AM Re: Tap Rules or not? [Re: George Little]
gfretwell Offline

Member

Registered: 07/20/04
Posts: 9045
Loc: Estero,Fl,usa
It sounds like a tap to me.
240.2
Quote:

Tap Conductors. As used in this article, a tap conductor is defined as a conductor, other than a service conductor, that has overcurrent protection ahead of its point of supply that exceeds the value permitted for similar conductors that are protected as described elsewhere in 240.4.
_________________________
Greg Fretwell

Top
#212837 - 02/19/14 01:30 PM Re: Tap Rules or not? [Re: George Little]
George Little Offline
Member

Registered: 01/18/04
Posts: 1492
Loc: Michigan USA
Thanks Greg, That's exactly what I was looking for. I was on Mike Holt's BB and they said the same thing it's a legal tap.
_________________________
George Little

Top
#212838 - 02/19/14 01:54 PM Re: Tap Rules or not? [Re: George Little]
Tesla Offline
Member

Registered: 06/16/04
Posts: 1280
Loc: Sacramento, CA
Not so fast.

It's a tap.

It may not be a legal tap. You have to follow the tap rules.

With protection of 400A ahead of 200A conductors you're permitted a run of 25 feet until reaching suitable OCPD -- in this case, 200A fusing.

That limit is applied separately for each tap -- and every phase or leg of that tap.

IIRC, there is a provision for longer lengths if and only if the conductors "outside the building" -- as in buried or encased in concrete. I've never pushed that to the limit except for one solitary fire pump circuit.

These are unique -- life safety -- circuits. Meaning that the conductors are not protected by OCPD from overloads in any way. The only 'protection' that such feeders get is from horrific bolted shorts -- and the need to interrupt power for service testing of the controller.

%%%%

BTW, though your feeders need to follow the tap rules, very few j-men would ever refer to such (feeder) taps as taps. In everyday usage the implication is that a 'tap' is that short conductor that goes from a wire nut junction to a load such as an electric range or lighting fixture.

The NEC DOES define such massive conductors as taps -- under the tap rules. I've known many a j-man who didn't know the tap rules, BTW. They are the kind of thing that never 'crosses his desk.' Feeders are normally sized and laid out by the foreman. So all of that 'book learning' fades into mist.
_________________________
Tesla

Top
#212842 - 02/19/14 06:14 PM Re: Tap Rules or not? [Re: George Little]
gfretwell Offline

Member

Registered: 07/20/04
Posts: 9045
Loc: Estero,Fl,usa
I assumed we were talking about equipment in close proximity and piped together.
_________________________
Greg Fretwell

Top
#212844 - 02/19/14 06:53 PM Re: Tap Rules or not? [Re: George Little]
HotLine1 Offline

Member

Registered: 04/03/02
Posts: 6805
Loc: Brick, NJ USA
Gentlemen:
I believe George was referencing a 400 amp resi service with 2x200 amp MCB panels 'tapped' from double barrel lugs in a 400/320 meter pan.

This is common over here in a lot of McMansions.

(Yes, they are under 25'.)

The 400/320 is a POCO approved meter pan; single phase.
_________________________
John

Top
#212845 - 02/19/14 07:11 PM Re: Tap Rules or not? [Re: George Little]
gfretwell Offline

Member

Registered: 07/20/04
Posts: 9045
Loc: Estero,Fl,usa
If this is right out of the meter can on the line side of the service disconnect, it isn't a tap and 230.23 applies.

Quote:
230.23 Size and Rating.
(A) General. Conductors shall have sufficient ampacity to carry the current for the load as calculated in accordance with Article 220 and shall have adequate mechanical strength.


A 200a disconnect would imply that you have computed the load on this panel to be =/<200 .
_________________________
Greg Fretwell

Top
#212847 - 02/19/14 07:35 PM Re: Tap Rules or not? [Re: George Little]
HotLine1 Offline

Member

Registered: 04/03/02
Posts: 6805
Loc: Brick, NJ USA
Greg:
Sorry, I did not see Georges 'fused service switch'!!
I still say 'tap'
_________________________
John

Top
#212848 - 02/19/14 08:12 PM Re: Tap Rules or not? [Re: George Little]
gfretwell Offline

Member

Registered: 07/20/04
Posts: 9045
Loc: Estero,Fl,usa
Yup, beyond the service disconnect, I agree. Feeder tap.
_________________________
Greg Fretwell

Top



ECN Electrical Forums - sponsored by Electrical Contractor Network - Electrical and Code Related Discussion for Electrical Contractors, Electricians, Inspectors, Instructors, Engineers and other related Professionals