The Electrical Contractor Network

ECN Electrical Forum
Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

Books, Tools and Test Equipment for Electrical and Construction Trades

Register Now!

Register Now!

We want your input!

Featured:
   

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

   
Recent Posts
Forum Software Upgrade coming soon...
by Webmaster
01/17/17 09:41 PM
Re: Fabricating Guards out of Lexan?
by frank
01/17/17 04:11 PM
Would ELV branch circuits be a good idea?
by gfretwell
01/17/17 01:26 PM
Why cables look like they do
by Texas_Ranger
01/17/17 12:33 PM
100% breakers?
by Texas_Ranger
01/16/17 06:13 AM
New in the Gallery:
Desk-mounted "power-board"
Shout Box

Top Posters (30 Days)
HotLine1 20
Webmaster 19
gfretwell 13
Trumpy 12
ghost307 12
Who's Online
1 registered (Webmaster), 0 Guests and 67 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#209231 - 03/17/13 12:24 PM romex
watersparkfalls Offline
Member

Registered: 03/08/05
Posts: 210
Loc: Washington...Not DC
Romex now has to be derated going though holes in wood structures? We are using the 2011 NEC here and I don't see any exceptions in the Washington Administrative Code(which supersedes NEC).

I didn't remember that when taking my continuing education class, but have recently gone to work for another contractor who has contracts for mixed use buildings that are stick built. We are using romex in the dwelling units so I thought I would read up(years since I used romex) and 334.80 directs you back to the conduit fill table.

Am I crazy or misinterpreting?
Thanks,
H20

Top
2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
#209232 - 03/17/13 12:49 PM Re: romex [Re: watersparkfalls]
gfretwell Offline


Member

Registered: 07/20/04
Posts: 9062
Loc: Estero,Fl,usa
NFPA is crazy, you are reading it right.
They are really telling us we need to drill more holes. In reality you still have the practical limit of 9 current carrying conductors (using the 90c column) through one hole so it is not that restrictive.

I am still not sure why I don't have to derate until a nipple is 2 feet long, even if it is packed in foam but I have to derate in a 1.5" penetration with some foam in it.
_________________________
Greg Fretwell

Top
#209238 - 03/17/13 07:23 PM Re: romex [Re: watersparkfalls]
Tesla Offline
Member

Registered: 06/16/04
Posts: 1280
Loc: Sacramento, CA
The nipple 'exception' is there to cover the ubiquitous 'Romex risers' all over America -- coming vertically up out of a panel. Whatever heat buildup induced by such a short run is cancelled by the 'naked' (sheathless) conductors within the panel.

Due to practice, and economics, such long nipples are not seen elsewhere in Romex installations.

========

NEMA standards limit Romex to 3 conductors plus a bare/ papered grounding/bonding conductor.

The NEC is just doing its part to make sure that no-one attempts to bore (hole saw?) oversized penetrations within wall studs. Yes, more, smaller, penetrations result in a stronger stud/ joist.

Anyone stuffing Romex beyond three cables per... is naughty.
_________________________
Tesla

Top


ECN Electrical Forums - sponsored by Electrical Contractor Network - Electrical and Code Related Discussion for Electrical Contractors, Electricians, Inspectors, Instructors, Engineers and other related Professionals