ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
Admin 17
Recent Posts
Anyone hiring inspectors?
by sparky66wv. 03/26/17 12:22 PM
Old decora style outlets
by Admin. 03/25/17 11:40 AM
ESA Arc flash course
by TheShockDoctors. 03/24/17 10:15 AM
fuse rejectors
by HotLine1. 03/24/17 07:53 AM
Another Forum Update
by Admin. 03/22/17 03:04 PM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
231,509 Are you busy
166,213 Re: Forum
160,660 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
1 registered members (sparky66wv), 62 guests, and 12 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
#206242 - 06/08/12 06:49 PM Non-watertight fittings in shielded locations  
wewire2  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 244
California
What do you guys think about this... Bridgeport makes a line of conduit fittings that used to be U.L. listed as being watertight. Should an inspector have an issue with installing a compression type connector like this outdoors on a conduit riser that is entering the bottom of a panel where it is shielded from direct rain? This might be a trick question...
Why do I ask???
3" diecast Bridgeport EMT/IMC/Rigid connector = $15.
3" Rigid connector = $130 - $180.



2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides

#206244 - 06/09/12 05:27 AM Re: Non-watertight fittings in shielded locations [Re: wewire2]  
Tesla  Offline
Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,273
Sacramento, CA
Are you referring to a 'Myers hub' as your Rigid connector?

======

I've never seen diecast connectors ever given a RT listing. Steel, yes.

The newer RT connectors don't differ much: just an additional seal, AFAIK.

I've seen inspectors tolerate Greenfield/ flex ( not Sealtite ) for THWN-2 taps to HVAC condensers -- in residential situations.

In which case, might D.C. S.S. connectors also pass for your application?

BTW, at 3", DCSS fit both RMC/IMC and EMT.


Tesla

#206245 - 06/09/12 03:39 PM Re: Non-watertight fittings in shielded locations [Re: Tesla]  
wewire2  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 244
California
The connector is a 3" D.C. compression connector that fits EMT/IMC/RGS and is the older style without plastic gaskets.
Since the fitting is under the panel it would be at most an
occasional damp location. I was wondering if would be code compliant to use the die-cast fitting since it is placed so as to prevent moisture from entering. 314.15 only addresses wet locations as far as the U.L. listing requirement is concerned. BTW, The rigid is being used to thwart copper thieves and is overkill for conductor protection in this case.


#206246 - 06/10/12 03:27 PM Re: Non-watertight fittings in shielded locations [Re: wewire2]  
HotLine1  Offline


Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,799
Brick, NJ USA
Sounds like the local AHJ determines if the underside of the panel requires a watertite connector or not.

Based on his decission, that would be your answer.

Asking him before you spend $$$.





John

#206247 - 06/10/12 04:19 PM Re: Non-watertight fittings in shielded locations [Re: HotLine1]  
wewire2  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 244
California
Good advice. I tried calling a couple times but couldn't get through. Double locknut threaded rigid connections under a panel or box outside never seem to raise an eyebrow. The meter panels have weep holes in them anyways so it shouldn't be an issue.



Member Spotlight
HappyElectrician
HappyElectrician
Penn USA
Posts: 31
Joined: December 2011
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.017s Queries: 15 (0.003s) Memory: 0.7670 MB (Peak: 0.9106 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-03-26 16:56:53 UTC