ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
Admin 19
Recent Posts
fuse rejectors
by NORCAL. 03/29/17 01:44 AM
Old decora style outlets
by NORCAL. 03/29/17 01:41 AM
NFPA stuff
by gfretwell. 03/28/17 08:08 PM
Anyone hiring inspectors?
by HotLine1. 03/27/17 08:03 AM
ESA Arc flash course
by TheShockDoctors. 03/24/17 10:15 AM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
231,742 Are you busy
166,641 Re: Forum
160,791 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 76 guests, and 12 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
#200399 - 03/30/11 08:33 PM Splice in service disconnect  
SJT  Offline
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 241
A 400amp main disconnect will need to be added outside a Building. Existing is a 400 amp main circuit breaker panel in the utility room. The Arc flash rating turned out to be a Cat. 4 for the Panel.(you have to wear a space suit) so by installing a Disconnect between the Panel and the transformer, the engineer says it will go to a category 2. This is fed from a pad mount transformer with the metering mounted on the outside. Can the feeders from the transformer be spliced in the disconnect if not long enough, to go to the line side of the switch? Or will we have to install a 2'x2' junction box. Existing, is the 4" LB going to the back of the Main Panel.
Sorry about the long story - Thanks, SJT

Work Gear for Electricians and the Trades

#200401 - 03/30/11 10:29 PM Re: Splice in service disconnect [Re: SJT]  
HotLine1  Offline

Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,803
Brick, NJ USA
IMHO, run this past the local AHJ first. Also you may have to run it by the local POCO. 'Line' side may be POCO jurisdiction. Using barrel crimps should be acceptable.


#200432 - 04/01/11 10:06 AM Re: Splice in service disconnect [Re: SJT]  
harold endean  Offline
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,233
Boonton, NJ
I'm sorry I only have my 2008 NEC with me, ( we are still on that code) but would 230.33 be of use in this case?

#200437 - 04/01/11 11:03 AM Re: Splice in service disconnect [Re: SJT]  
HotLine1  Offline

Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,803
Brick, NJ USA
230.33 refers you to 110.14 regarding splicing methodology, and refers to 300.xx articles which I understand are not applicable in the OP.

I mentioned the local POCO, and AHJ for a few reasons. Here (PS) crimp splices are acceptable on a case by case basis, as they are by me, and most other AHJs. Extending an existing lateral feeder to terminate at the line side of a disconnect switch, in lieu of replacement of that feeder can be acceptable. Crimp splice; feeder in acceptable condition, and sufficient 'space' within the disco.


#200464 - 04/02/11 01:19 PM Re: Splice in service disconnect [Re: SJT]  
gfretwell  Offline

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,060
I only had the "splice in the disco" come up once and I agreed to the irreversible crimp splice, simply because any alternative was very burdensome on the installer and I did not see any particular hazard. We were literally talking about a foot of wire.

Greg Fretwell

#200468 - 04/02/11 01:33 PM Re: Splice in service disconnect [Re: SJT]  
SJT  Offline
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 241
Thanks for the inputs,
I think I'll go with the barrel crimps, if the wires are not long enough.

Member Spotlight
dallas, texas, USA
Posts: 67
Joined: January 2002
Show All Member Profiles 

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.017s Queries: 15 (0.003s) Memory: 0.7752 MB (Peak: 0.9222 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-03-29 15:03:05 UTC