ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#197321 - 11/19/10 05:06 PM Feeder running through building
George Little Offline
Member
Registered: 01/18/04
Posts: 1488
Loc: Michigan USA
A fellow inspector called me and asked if it was permissible to run a feeder through a strip mall inside the building having it pass through multiple rental suites before terminating in a sub-panel. I answered yes and I used 225.37 (08 NEC) as my code reference. Got to thinking about it afterwards and wonder if I gave him good information. Article 225 is for Outside Branch Circuits and Feeders. However, it clearly talks about passing through a structure and the requirements associated with it. Is there another code reference that might apply? Article 215 says nothing about this scenario.

225.37


Edited by George Little (11/19/10 05:08 PM)
_________________________
George Little
Top
2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
#197323 - 11/19/10 07:45 PM Re: Feeder running through building [Re: George Little]
HotLine1 Offline


Member
Registered: 04/03/02
Posts: 6778
Loc: Brick, NJ USA
George:
The issue is the accessability to the feeder in the event that repair/replace/service is needed, and being able to disturb/disrupt/infringe, etc on the adjacent tenant spaces to perform same. In some comm properties I worked at (as EC) the landlord had a clause within the lease that granted access for any service work for the adjacent/other tenants. What legal hat they hung that on I don't know; but it worked!

Without doing a lot of reading, I cannot put an NEC Article on this that is concrete. There have been many debates at meetings, but no articles.

Resi condos have the feeders run thru the common corridors. Most (if not all) feeders in our mall are thru the service corridors and/or common areas. The last two multi bldg apt complexes had all feeders thru common areas by design.

Let's see if anyone here has any input.

I must say you offer up all very interesting subjects!!!
_________________________
John
Top
#197329 - 11/20/10 03:07 PM Re: Feeder running through building [Re: HotLine1]
George Little Offline
Member
Registered: 01/18/04
Posts: 1488
Loc: Michigan USA
Hey Greg, what's your spin on this subject? You have a lot of contacts and I'm sure you know we all respect your comments.
_________________________
George Little
Top
#197331 - 11/20/10 04:32 PM Re: Feeder running through building [Re: George Little]
gfretwell Offline


Member
Registered: 07/20/04
Posts: 9039
Loc: Estero,Fl,usa
I am not sure if I have seen blood on the floor but I have seen big fights over this. I think there may have even been one or two here. It usually centers around the wiring method and what a "building" is.
The concerns go all the way from access to a fault to theft of services.
I am not sure I have seen a code cite that does not require a lot of bending and cocking your head.
"Is it subject to <fill in the blank> damage?"
Construction type may fit in.
"Is this a litigious town?"

Etc

That's why you make the big bucks wink
_________________________
Greg Fretwell
Top
#197332 - 11/20/10 05:00 PM Re: Feeder running through building [Re: gfretwell]
gfretwell Offline


Member
Registered: 07/20/04
Posts: 9039
Loc: Estero,Fl,usa
"Single management?"
That may make a difference but we know that is a real estate condition that can change.
_________________________
Greg Fretwell
Top
#197333 - 11/20/10 05:17 PM Re: Feeder running through building [Re: gfretwell]
George Little Offline
Member
Registered: 01/18/04
Posts: 1488
Loc: Michigan USA
Thanks Greg and John, I can understand there being security issues and contractual issues but what I see so far is a lack of electrical code issues. So I guess as an electrical inspector, I can't write a violation.
_________________________
George Little
Top
#197334 - 11/20/10 05:53 PM Re: Feeder running through building [Re: George Little]
gfretwell Offline


Member
Registered: 07/20/04
Posts: 9039
Loc: Estero,Fl,usa
As my CBO at the state used to tell me, "just make it safe".
_________________________
Greg Fretwell
Top
#197335 - 11/21/10 01:33 AM Re: Feeder running through building [Re: gfretwell]
Niko Offline
Member
Registered: 08/17/06
Posts: 356
Loc: Campbell, CA
I don't do installations in strip malls but like to know, as long as it is a straight shot from the sub panel to the main, what is the problem of running feeder through another tenant's ceiling.
_________________________
Be kind to your neighbor, he knows where you live

Top
#197336 - 11/21/10 07:12 AM Re: Feeder running through building [Re: Niko]
HotLine1 Offline


Member
Registered: 04/03/02
Posts: 6778
Loc: Brick, NJ USA
Niko:
As Greg said above, there's no NEC direct guidance on this type issue, but some Articles that can 'lean' toward it.

With comm jobs most issues seem to deal with future access to the 'space' the feeders may run through. That revolves around the wiring methods installed. Raceway thru space, end to end, no boxes, condulets, etc., I see no basis for any argument. The jobs installed in MC cable, or other allowed cabling are where the access comes into discussion. Some landlords include a clause within the lease for access, but that's a legal issue, not NEC directly related.

_________________________
John
Top
#197337 - 11/21/10 09:37 AM Re: Feeder running through building [Re: HotLine1]
renosteinke Offline
Cat Servant
Member
Registered: 01/22/05
Posts: 5316
Loc: Blue Collar Country
I've looked over my notes from the past upmteen years, and having the feeder pass through another tenant's space doesn't happen very often.

It's an interesting pattern; most often the gas, phone, data, and every other kind of line runs in a straight shot over everyone's ceiling, but the feeders are most often under the slab.

Where I've found the feeders passing through other spaces, there has invariably been quite a history of remodels and shifting spaces.

I have seen local codes that required all feeders (from the meter to the panel) to be in some form of pipe.

I fear that all this discussion has accomplished is to give the code-changers yet another opportunity to intrude on what has been a design issue. With their desire to 'conform' to all manner of other codes, they seem determined to address all manner of non-electrical matters.
Top
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >

Member Spotlight
Member Since: 05/03/03
Posts: 1137
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box


Who's Online
0 registered (), 93 Guests and 9 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
 
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
 
Top Posters (30 Days)
Admin 47
HotLine1 43
gfretwell 19
Ruben Rocha 12
Trumpy 9
 
Newest Members
KrmtFrg, Stack, Scotto, Freecrowder, clee512

ECN Electrical Forums - sponsored by Electrical Contractor Network - Electrical and Code Related Discussion for Electrical Contractors, Electricians, Inspectors, Instructors, Engineers and other related Professionals