ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 >
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#191199 - 12/21/09 07:40 AM Fire cause
Jim M Offline
Member
Registered: 08/10/01
Posts: 457
Loc: Chestertown, MD, USA
Wonder if this is the official cause or just the reporters take on the cause? How about improper storage of combustibles too close to a heating source?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34484381/ns/local_news-baltimore_md/

Top
Work Gear for Electricians and the Trades
#191200 - 12/21/09 07:58 AM Re: Fire cause [Re: Jim M]
renosteinke Offline
Cat Servant
Member
Registered: 01/22/05
Posts: 5316
Loc: Blue Collar Country
The headline conflicts with the story. Maybe the editor ought to read his own paper.

Stuff gets stacked on the stove ... then catches fire when the stove is turned on? Who could have anticipated that ever happening?
Top
#191201 - 12/21/09 08:58 AM Re: Fire cause [Re: renosteinke]
jdevlin Offline
Member
Registered: 08/07/02
Posts: 402
Loc: welland ontario canada
Yea but the circuit was turned on. That was the cause. No fault to the operator or the person who stored the junk. It's the breaker's fault. It should have known better than to let itself be turned on.
Top
#191203 - 12/21/09 10:17 AM Re: Fire cause [Re: jdevlin]
EV607797 Offline
Member
Registered: 10/25/06
Posts: 744
Loc: Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Just like when someone plugs an electric heater into an 18/2 extension cord, causing an "electrical" fire. No, it was caused by carelessness, not electricity.

In this case, I'd agree that the reporter's take was way off.
_________________________
---Ed---

"But the guy at Home Depot said it would work."
Top
#191205 - 12/21/09 11:32 AM Re: Fire cause [Re: EV607797]
gfretwell Offline


Member
Registered: 07/20/04
Posts: 9039
Loc: Estero,Fl,usa
The people who write headlines seem to never actually read the story.
I also question a lot of these "electrical" fire reports.
You know this one was reported as electrical, not stupidity. That skews the statistics and allows groups like NFPA to justify dumb stuff like the AFCI requirement.
_________________________
Greg Fretwell
Top
#191217 - 12/21/09 06:02 PM Re: Fire cause [Re: gfretwell]
HotLine1 Online   content


Member
Registered: 04/03/02
Posts: 6778
Loc: Brick, NJ USA
$ 3.5 mil in damages added into the running totals of 'electrical fires'. I question the fire reports that I see that are 'electrical', of which 99 to 100% are 'stupidity' that no AFCI/GFCI/TR/WR would prevent. Next code cycle, perhaps we may have a mandated "SFCI".

(Stupidity Fault Current Interupter)
_________________________
John
Top
#191222 - 12/21/09 06:40 PM Re: Fire cause [Re: HotLine1]
Retired_Helper Offline
Member
Registered: 03/13/07
Posts: 165
Loc: Maine
I wonder if any SFCI's will come back to the QA lab painted over, packed with plaster, showing signs of being hammered into the box, with a note attached, "Doesn't work"?
Top
#191403 - 12/26/09 11:17 PM Re: Fire cause [Re: Retired_Helper]
Tinkerer Offline
Member
Registered: 12/13/04
Posts: 16
Loc: Birmingham, AL, USA
Along this same line I remember an editorial in EC&M back in the 70's complaining about poor fire cause attribution. It cited a report where the fire investigator said that the source of the fire could not be determined since the building did not have electrical service.
Top
#191408 - 12/27/09 07:23 AM Re: Fire cause [Re: Tinkerer]
renosteinke Offline
Cat Servant
Member
Registered: 01/22/05
Posts: 5316
Loc: Blue Collar Country
Tinkerer, I was on scene the morning after a fatal fire in a hotel room. My job was to 'make safe' the electrical.

This fire had been so intense that the couplings had melted off the EMT. Still, the point of origen was fairly clear; there was little left of the bed but the metal parts of the box springs. Chalk one up to smoking in bed.

This all aside, the adjuster from the insurance company was just determined to attribute the fire to 'electrical.' This was despite the scene having already been dissected by the crime-scene folks (there had also been some indication there might have been foul play).
Top
#191412 - 12/27/09 09:28 AM Re: Fire cause [Re: renosteinke]
gfretwell Offline


Member
Registered: 07/20/04
Posts: 9039
Loc: Estero,Fl,usa
I am another one who thinks "electrical" is a quick way out without actually finding the cause of a fire. Unless they can actually tell me some story that makes sense they are just throwing a wild guess out there that nobody will dispute. The more fires that get attributed to some nebulous "electrical" cause, the more plausible it becomes.
The down side of that laziness is how easy it was to justify things like the AFCI requirement.
_________________________
Greg Fretwell
Top
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 >

Member Spotlight
Member Since: 07/05/02
Posts: 8211
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box


Who's Online
0 registered (), 84 Guests and 9 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
 
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
 
Top Posters (30 Days)
Admin 47
HotLine1 43
gfretwell 19
Ruben Rocha 12
Trumpy 9
 
Newest Members
Scotto, Freecrowder, clee512, Jdscott2005, FAIZAN

ECN Electrical Forums - sponsored by Electrical Contractor Network - Electrical and Code Related Discussion for Electrical Contractors, Electricians, Inspectors, Instructors, Engineers and other related Professionals