ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
Admin 17
Recent Posts
Old decora style outlets
by Admin. 03/25/17 11:40 AM
ESA Arc flash course
by TheShockDoctors. 03/24/17 10:15 AM
fuse rejectors
by HotLine1. 03/24/17 07:53 AM
Another Forum Update
by Admin. 03/22/17 03:04 PM
Dining room plugs
by watersparkfalls. 03/21/17 10:31 PM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
231,432 Are you busy
166,150 Re: Forum
160,606 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 80 guests, and 10 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
#190423 - 11/16/09 09:59 PM GFPE vs. GFCI  
leespark  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 54
Massachusetts
Art 426.28 requires GFPE protection for deicing and snow melting equipment. What would is the advantage to using GFPE vs GFCI? GFCI I believe trips at 5ma where GFPE trips at 30ma, so I would think GFCI protection would actually be safer. Would nuisance trips occur?

I'm not trying to circumvent the code but just curious why GFCI would not be allowed. I must admit, I have never even seen a GFPE breaker.

Thanks


2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides

#190424 - 11/16/09 11:19 PM Re: GFPE vs. GFCI [Re: leespark]  
HotLine1  Offline


Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,799
Brick, NJ USA
Leespark:
Perhaps the following commentary from the '08 NEC Handbook.....

"Section 426.28 requires ground-fault protection of equipment for fixed outdoor electric deicing and snow-melting equipment. Rather than protecting the entire branch circuit, the ground-fault protection requirement is focused on protecting just the equipment itself. This affords the manufacturer and the user an option of providing both circuit and equipment protection or just the required equipment protection. This required protection for fixed outdoor deicing and snow-melting equipment may be accomplished by using circuit breakers equipped with ground-fault equipment protection (GFEP) or an integral device supplied as part of the deicing or snow-melting equipment that is sensitive to leakage currents in the magnitude of 6 mA to 50 mA. These protection devices, if applied properly, will substantially reduce the risk of a fire being started by low-level electrical arcing.
It is important to understand that this required equipment protection is not the same as a GFCI used for personal protection that trips at 5 mA ( 1 mA)."

Reading that, IMHO it sounds like the GFPE is supplied as part of the de-icing equipment, to protect the equipment only, not the feeder.

I have not seen a GFPE breaker, and only circulating hot water de-icing systems.


John

#190425 - 11/16/09 11:21 PM Re: GFPE vs. GFCI [Re: leespark]  
pdh  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 354
I see the big advantage of "ground for protection for equipment" over "ground fault protection for people" as avoiding nuisance trips. This could happen due to a higher capacitance in the (possibly) long wiring of the element wiring of the deicing or snow melting equipment. Also, I don't see where 426.28 specifically precludes using GFPP (GFCI) to meet the requirement, as long as the device ALSO protects equipment. I don't see any requirement that the ground fault protective devices be specifically listed for this category of usage.


#190432 - 11/17/09 12:40 PM Re: GFPE vs. GFCI [Re: pdh]  
JBD  Offline
Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 599
WI, USA
GFCI devices are not prevented from being used on de-icing equipment. But, many de-icing circuits inherently have leakage current greater than 5mA (the trip point of a GFCI),this usually happen with lengths exceeding 100'.

GFCI is a specific term for 'people protection'. GFPE is a generic term.

Square D calls their GFPE breakers Equipment Protective Device (EPD). The part number for a QO 30mA breaker is QOxxxEPD.



Member Spotlight
TOOL_5150
TOOL_5150
Bay Area
Posts: 61
Joined: August 2007
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.016s Queries: 15 (0.004s) Memory: 0.7595 MB (Peak: 0.8925 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-03-25 17:35:36 UTC