The Electrical Contractor Network

ECN Electrical Forum
Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

Books, Tools and Test Equipment for Electrical and Construction Trades

Register Now!

Register Now!

We want your input!

Featured:
   

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

   
Recent Posts
230 or 345 kV transmission lines?
by Vlado
Yesterday at 09:33 AM
breaker meltdown
by crselectric
Yesterday at 12:42 AM
Electrical mast flashing product
by ThomasWinfrey
09/22/16 12:14 AM
What estimating software do you recommend?
by sparky
09/21/16 07:20 PM
"Dry Run" Inspection goes awry
by HotLine1
09/20/16 07:39 PM
New in the Gallery:
12.5A through 0.75mm˛ flex (just out of curiosity)
Shout Box

Top Posters (30 Days)
HotLine1 17
gfretwell 9
sparky 9
sparky66wv 8
Vlado 6
Who's Online
0 registered (), 245 Guests and 4 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#188381 - 08/04/09 11:57 AM Fire Pumps 695 & real Fires
Alan Nadon Offline
Member

Registered: 03/10/05
Posts: 398
Loc: Elkhart, IN. USA
We had a recent fire in a sprinkled warehouse that caused a problem. A seperate fire pump building was located 100 feet from the warehouse building.
The utility supply went to a transformer bank with utility cut outs. Then it split with one drop to the fire pump building the other drop to the warehouse. Both services were located inside.
The fire in the building got above the sprinklers. The fire was near the service equipment in the building. Because they couldn't get to the service the only other place to shut off the power to the building was at the transformer. If they do that it drops out the fire pump.
For years I have inspected installations where the building and the fire pumps are from the same transformer bank. They comply with the Code. But..............
I never thought about it but that is where the utiltiy usualy cuts power during a fire. Seems like a waste to seperate everything when it all comes from the same transforemers.
I don't see a solution, just a heads up that that sprinkler might not help that much after all.
_________________________
Alan--
If it was easy, anyone could do it.

Top
Work Gear for Electricians and the Trades

Work Gear for Electricians and the Trades
Work Gear for Electricians and the Trades
Arc Flash Clothing, Gloves, KneePads, Tool Belts, Pouches, Tool Carriers, etc. etc....

#188383 - 08/04/09 01:44 PM Re: Fire Pumps 695 & real Fires [Re: Alan Nadon]
renosteinke Offline
Cat Servant
Member

Registered: 01/22/05
Posts: 5299
Loc: Blue Collar Country
Give Murphy credit for this one ...

Look, we can only do our best, and try to address the most expected risks. You can't make anything proof against every eventuality.

With the fire out of reach of the sprinklers .... I wonder if there was a fault with the sprinkler design .... I have to ask what good then pumps would accomplish even if they had continued to operate.


Edited by renosteinke (08/04/09 01:45 PM)

Top
#188386 - 08/04/09 05:50 PM Re: Fire Pumps 695 & real Fires [Re: renosteinke]
leland Offline
Member

Registered: 08/20/07
Posts: 856
Loc: Lowell area, Ma. USA
I'm with 'Reno. Faulty install. Those should all be up heads for this very reason.
If it (fire) gets ahead... The pump don't matter. so....

As with every dilemma,it will 'come out in the wash'.
Sounds like a good day to have insurance!

Top
#188388 - 08/04/09 08:20 PM Re: Fire Pumps 695 & real Fires [Re: leland]
frenchelectrican Offline

Member

Registered: 02/06/03
Posts: 938
Loc: Wi/ Paris France { France for ...
That one reason why some area are shying away from electric fire pumps they are going with either diesel or steam turbine fire pumps to advoid that issue.

Merci,Marc
_________________________
Pas de problme,il marche n'est-ce pas?"(No problem, it works doesn't it?)


Top
#188393 - 08/05/09 07:29 AM Re: Fire Pumps 695 & real Fires [Re: frenchelectrican]
HotLine1 Offline

Member

Registered: 04/03/02
Posts: 6785
Loc: Brick, NJ USA
Sounds like a 'bad' sprinkler design. Was the building 'modified' after the original install?
_________________________
John

Top
#188404 - 08/05/09 09:43 PM Re: Fire Pumps 695 & real Fires [Re: HotLine1]
WESTUPLACE Offline
Member

Registered: 03/29/04
Posts: 252
Loc: Kingwood, TX USA
Many times the fire loading exceeds the sprinkler design. The K Mart warehouse burned to the ground several years ago because of this. Buildings need to be inspected after they are filled by a fire protection engineer to see if additional protection is needed. Sometimes sprinklers need to be installed on the shelving. A pallet of camping fuel or lots of sawdust (pressboard) furniture can quickly overtake a standard sprinkler system.

Top
#188409 - 08/06/09 12:06 PM Re: Fire Pumps 695 & real Fires [Re: WESTUPLACE]
Alan Nadon Offline
Member

Registered: 03/10/05
Posts: 398
Loc: Elkhart, IN. USA
The fire started in a motor home. The wood paneling and L.P. gas inside finally blew out of the home when the windows went. The fiberglass outer shell kept the sprinklers from reaching the fire. Once it was outside the vehicle it went clear to the roof, above the sprinklers.
WestUP.S. My oldest brother had just been put in charge of construction / buildings for K-mart (East coast) when they lost that warehouse. He said that the steel sprinkler pipes were melting while still discharging water.
_________________________
Alan--
If it was easy, anyone could do it.

Top
#188452 - 08/09/09 06:42 PM Re: Fire Pumps 695 & real Fires [Re: WESTUPLACE]
brianl703 Offline
Member

Registered: 05/16/05
Posts: 165
Loc: Manassas, VA
Originally Posted By: WESTUPLACE
Many times the fire loading exceeds the sprinkler design. The K Mart warehouse burned to the ground several years ago because of this.


I didn't remember reading about this anywhere, so I did a little Google research and found out why: It happened in 1982. A little more than several years ago, but anyway, here's the NFPA report:

http://www.nfpa.org/assets/files//MbrSecurePDF/FIFallsTownship.pdf

Top
#188453 - 08/09/09 07:25 PM Re: Fire Pumps 695 & real Fires [Re: brianl703]
ameterguy Offline
Member

Registered: 05/17/02
Posts: 33
Loc: Mass
As a utility Meterman, I have voiced my opinion against feeding the fire pumps from the same transformer feeding the building. I have been told, that this is code compliant & per spec, but that does not make it right. (One customer told me he was only installing the fire pump for the insurance discount, because his building would never have a fire...)

I know if we respond to a building fire, the first thing we do is pull the cutouts to deenergize the building. This is required by the local Fire depts, to eliminate the risk of a Firefighter being electrocuted.

The best fire pump install is a free standing building fed from a different transformer, we have a few of these in our area. They are more expensive to install, but it is the best way to go.

Top
#188456 - 08/09/09 08:30 PM Re: Fire Pumps 695 & real Fires [Re: ameterguy]
brianl703 Offline
Member

Registered: 05/16/05
Posts: 165
Loc: Manassas, VA
Indeed, one of the issues outlined in the NFPA report I linked to is that the booster fire pump was wired after the switchgear, so it lost power when power was cut to the building.

Top
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >



ECN Electrical Forums - sponsored by Electrical Contractor Network - Electrical and Code Related Discussion for Electrical Contractors, Electricians, Inspectors, Instructors, Engineers and other related Professionals