The Electrical Contractor Network

ECN Electrical Forum
Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

Books, Tools and Test Equipment for Electrical and Construction Trades

Register Now!

Register Now!

We want your input!

Featured:
   

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

   
Recent Posts
Sprinklered equipment 26-008
by bigpapa
Yesterday at 04:24 PM
On Delay Relay with Auto Reset
by Potseal
12/01/16 09:59 AM
Wow, that was close!
by jraef
11/28/16 07:06 PM
Earthquake in New Zeeland
by RODALCO
11/27/16 11:25 PM
Calling all Non-US members!! (Non-US only)
by Tjia1981
11/27/16 06:33 AM
New in the Gallery:
12.5A through 0.75mm˛ flex (just out of curiosity)
Shout Box

Top Posters (30 Days)
gfretwell 15
HotLine1 10
Trumpy 8
Texas_Ranger 8
sparkyinak 7
Who's Online
1 registered (gfretwell), 218 Guests and 4 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#187389 - 06/25/09 01:54 PM Is this transformer calculation correct?
bigpapa Offline
Member

Registered: 03/18/06
Posts: 77
Loc: canada
600v 3 phase to 120/208v 150kva dry type isolation transformer.
For some reason I need to be reminded of certain things that I have
forgotten over the years. Maybe someone can refresh me on this
transformer calculation.
Transformer is dry 150kva 3ph 600 to 120/208v isolation type.


Rated primary current is 144.5A
Primary breaker chosen is 150A therefore secondary current is 150x turns ratio of
2.88 which is 432A
Secondary conductors are 125% of RATED secondary current and
not actual secondary current which would be 416.6 x 1.25 = 520.8A.

I am thinking that secondary conductors are not calculated on the basis of actual secondary current but the transformers rated current.
Am I correct or have I missed something here?

Top
2014 / 2011 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
#187395 - 06/25/09 05:52 PM Re: Is this transformer calculation correct? [Re: bigpapa]
Yoopersup Offline
Member

Registered: 03/04/03
Posts: 826
Loc: Michigan
This is a 480 volt 3 phase to 120/208 volt 3 phase right??
Also this is a feeder right???
1.73 x 480 = 830.4
150 x 1000 = 150000
150000 divided 830.4 = 180.63 amps primary
1.73 x 208 = 359.84
150000 divided by 359.84 = 416.85

then go to table 450.3(B)

That 600volts on Primary I think might be more like 480 volts.
Yoopers

Top
#187398 - 06/25/09 06:32 PM Re: Is this transformer calculation correct? [Re: Yoopersup]
bigpapa Offline
Member

Registered: 03/18/06
Posts: 77
Loc: canada
Americans.

Top
#187401 - 06/25/09 08:29 PM Re: Is this transformer calculation correct? [Re: bigpapa]
twh Offline
Member

Registered: 03/11/04
Posts: 898
Loc: Regina, Sask.
Rule 26-258: 125% of rated secondary current
150,000 / 208 / 1.732 x 1.25

primary conductors are also 125% in the same rule. It's the same calculation except 600 volts is substituted for 208 volts.

The same rule allows you to reduce the size to the demand providing... etc.

Overcurrent rules are in 26-256. Watch the ampacity of panels and splitters fed from transformers. They also must be rated for 125%.

For our Southern friends, 600/347 volts is common in Canada.

Top
#187403 - 06/25/09 10:30 PM Re: Is this transformer calculation correct? [Re: bigpapa]
jay8 Offline
Member

Registered: 07/28/05
Posts: 183
Loc: Vancouver, BC
Lets not turn this into some American bashing thing, his calculations are correct for secondary current. Maybe you forgot to use those little icons above each post.

Top



ECN Electrical Forums - sponsored by Electrical Contractor Network - Electrical and Code Related Discussion for Electrical Contractors, Electricians, Inspectors, Instructors, Engineers and other related Professionals