The Electrical Contractor Network

ECN Electrical Forum
Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

Books, Tools and Test Equipment for Electrical and Construction Trades

Register Now!

Register Now!

We want your input!

Featured:
   

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

   
Recent Posts
Correct rotation, wrong sequence
by Potseal
Today at 03:14 PM
Industrail Control Panel bonding per 409.108
by sparkyinak
Yesterday at 06:29 PM
Calling all Non-US members!! (Non-US only)
by aussie240
12/07/16 02:39 AM
Photo Upload Tutorial
by DanK
12/06/16 11:35 PM
Sprinklered equipment 26-008
by bigpapa
12/02/16 04:24 PM
New in the Gallery:
12.5A through 0.75mm˛ flex (just out of curiosity)
Shout Box

Top Posters (30 Days)
gfretwell 12
HotLine1 10
Potseal 9
sparkyinak 8
Texas_Ranger 7
Who's Online
0 registered (), 198 Guests and 4 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#177849 - 05/13/08 04:59 PM LR and LL Conduit Bodys
BigJohn Offline
Member

Registered: 03/06/04
Posts: 352
Loc: Boston, MA
I often see pipes mounted on the wall that have LBs where an LR or and LL would have made the cover more accessible. I always thought this was just a hack by somebody too lazy to get the proper fitting, until....

We had to pull three #4s and a ground into an 1&1/4" pipe and somebody got the bright idea of puting an LR at a corner (no, it wasn't me, but I thought it was a good idea, too.)

I have pulled 500s that went into the pipe easier than those stupid wires went around the corner of that LR. Was this a fluke, or is it just generally a bad idea to use LL/LR fittings on anything larger than maybe #10 or #8? Should I adopt the practice of using sideways LBs for all big wire?

-John

Top
Work Gear for Electricians and the Trades

Work Gear for Electricians and the Trades
Work Gear for Electricians and the Trades
Arc Flash Clothing, Gloves, KneePads, Tool Belts, Pouches, Tool Carriers, etc. etc....

#177850 - 05/13/08 05:21 PM Re: LR and LL Conduit Bodys [Re: BigJohn]
twh Offline
Member

Registered: 03/11/04
Posts: 898
Loc: Regina, Sask.
If you really want an LR, oversize it and use reducer bushings. The extra space makes it a lot easier. A junction box is even better and they cost less than an LB.

Top
#177851 - 05/13/08 05:30 PM Re: LR and LL Conduit Bodys [Re: twh]
renosteinke Offline
Cat Servant
Member

Registered: 01/22/05
Posts: 5305
Loc: Blue Collar Country
Conduit bodies are nearly always a PITA ... especially if there's one at either end of the pipe!

If you MUST use one, it's best to arrange the pull so that the wire enters the box from the short side, and exits the long side. When the pull is nearly complete, a tug from the end where you first began will pull the wires in nice, straight, and tight.

However, I prefer to use a box in place of the bodies for the smaller pipe sizes, and a short piece of gutter for the larger sizes. Not only is the pull easier, the final install looks cleaner too!

Top
#177891 - 05/14/08 04:09 PM Re: LR and LL Conduit Bodys [Re: renosteinke]
kale Offline
Member

Registered: 11/08/02
Posts: 168
Has anybody used the Anybody from Arlington?
http://www.aifittings.com/new_images/anybody_p2.jpg

Top
#177892 - 05/14/08 04:37 PM Re: LR and LL Conduit Bodys [Re: kale]
DYNAMITE Offline
Member

Registered: 12/22/03
Posts: 37
Loc: Winkler, MB, Canada
I just got some of those Anybody's in and they seem to work good. But like what others already have said it is tougher to pull around an LR than an LB

Top
#177897 - 05/14/08 05:36 PM Re: LR and LL Conduit Bodys [Re: DYNAMITE]
twh Offline
Member

Registered: 03/11/04
Posts: 898
Loc: Regina, Sask.
The Anybody is too ugly to use anywhere that it might be seen. It is a good idea, though.

Top
#177906 - 05/14/08 08:25 PM Re: LR and LL Conduit Bodys [Re: twh]
Lostazhell Offline
Member

Registered: 02/21/04
Posts: 1248
Loc: Bakersfield, CA (Originally Or...
Anybody ever use LBD's? Use a size larger than the conduit you're running and RE down the hubs.... Much easier to get the covers on with large wire pulls vs. a standard LB

Crouse Hinds LBD

We also use LL's LR's T's, TB's TA's, etc. out where I work.. Many tight spots and these all must remain accessible

Top
#177912 - 05/15/08 04:22 AM Re: LR and LL Conduit Bodys [Re: Lostazhell]
resqcapt19 Offline
Member

Registered: 11/10/00
Posts: 2209
Loc: IL
I avoid LRs and LLs if possible and never use them if the wires are larger than #10.
As far as the use of the LBDs or oversized LBs, in many cases this is required by the code rules. Conduit bodies are covered by 314.28. If you are using an LB with #4 or larger conductors and the LB is not marked for the maximum number and size of conductors then the LB must comply with the size requirements found in 314.28(A)(2).
_________________________
Don(resqcapt19)

Top
#177914 - 05/15/08 06:57 AM Re: LR and LL Conduit Bodys [Re: resqcapt19]
ghost307 Offline
Member

Registered: 05/09/05
Posts: 884
Loc: Chicago Illinois USA
We sold a lot of these Mogul conduit bodies at Appleton Electric when the NEC changed to require them back several cycles ago.
My favorite was the BUB, which had the cover at 45 degrees. A pull in either direction was a straight shot without hitting the wall of the casting.
_________________________
Ghost307

Top



ECN Electrical Forums - sponsored by Electrical Contractor Network - Electrical and Code Related Discussion for Electrical Contractors, Electricians, Inspectors, Instructors, Engineers and other related Professionals