The Electrical Contractor Network

ECN Electrical Forum
Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

Books, Tools and Test Equipment for Electrical and Construction Trades

Register Now!

Register Now!

We want your input!

Featured:
   

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

   
Recent Posts
230 or 345 kV transmission lines?
by Vlado
09/24/16 09:33 AM
breaker meltdown
by crselectric
09/24/16 12:42 AM
Electrical mast flashing product
by ThomasWinfrey
09/22/16 12:14 AM
What estimating software do you recommend?
by sparky
09/21/16 07:20 PM
"Dry Run" Inspection goes awry
by HotLine1
09/20/16 07:39 PM
New in the Gallery:
12.5A through 0.75mm˛ flex (just out of curiosity)
Shout Box

Top Posters (30 Days)
HotLine1 14
sparky 9
sparky66wv 8
gfretwell 8
Vlado 6
Who's Online
1 registered (Texas_Ranger), 273 Guests and 4 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#177141 - 04/23/08 01:34 AM Better De-fragging
Trumpy Offline

Member

Registered: 07/05/02
Posts: 8530
Loc: SI,New Zealand
Want a better defrag program than WinXP gives you?
Try this one, it is FREE.
I've been using it for the last 3 months, no complaints so far.
Here is the link: here

This will not work with any versions older than XP.
_________________________
Let's face it, these days if you're not young, you're old - Red Green grin

Top
Test Equipment:

Large Selection of Test Equipment For Electrical, HVAC, Test & Measurement
Large Selection of Test Equipment For Electrical, HVAC, Test & Measurement

#177151 - 04/23/08 10:18 AM Re: Better De-fragging [Re: Trumpy]
gfretwell Offline

Member

Registered: 07/20/04
Posts: 9012
Loc: Estero,Fl,usa
I didn't think defragging was that important with the new file system. Wasn't that one of the selling points?
_________________________
Greg Fretwell

Top
#177343 - 04/29/08 03:22 PM Re: Better De-fragging [Re: gfretwell]
JoeTestingEngr Offline
Member

Registered: 11/04/05
Posts: 786
Loc: Chicago, Il.
I downloaded and ran it a few times this weekend. It does work without restarting over and over again as the canned program tends to. It leaves some huge gaps between files though. Maybe part of it is the huge files associated with capturing DTV and video. The auto function defaults to running during <=40% CPU resource usage. It started while I was watching a DTV program and it caused frequent pauses. I tried lowering the resource limit to as low as 5% but that doesn't help. But other than knowing that I'll need to turn it off when I'm using the tuner/capture card, 2 thumbs up! Thanks for sharing, Mike!
Joe
My results are based on a dual core Pentium @ 3.0GHz w 1GB ram running XP Pro
Joe

Top
#177508 - 05/05/08 03:16 AM Re: Better De-fragging [Re: JoeTestingEngr]
Gloria Offline
Member

Registered: 05/01/04
Posts: 395
Loc: Budapest, Hungary
WoW, mIke, this rulez. Did you try the registry error fixer too?
_________________________
The world is full of beauty if the heart is full of love

Top
#178780 - 06/11/08 05:07 PM Re: Better De-fragging [Re: gfretwell]
Trumpy Offline

Member

Registered: 07/05/02
Posts: 8530
Loc: SI,New Zealand
 Originally Posted By: gfretwell
I didn't think defragging was that important with the new file system. Wasn't that one of the selling points?

Greg,
I tried a little experiment a few months ago, by purposely not defragging my XP computer, for 2 months I let the thing slide.
After the first month, I noticed the computer starting to slow down slightly, even though I was still doing spyware and virus scans every few days, these scans were also getting slower as time went by.

Come the end of the 2 months, I opened the Windows Defrag application and clicked "Analyze", I was met with a long red bar in the disk usage space, with a few blue bars in amongst it.

I am of the opinion that Windows XP, merely throws files into the disk on you computer in any place that it will fit, no matter how long it will take to find it again later.

The reason I went looking for this Smart Defrag program in the beginning, was that I found I was having to do 2, even 3 defrags with the XP version to even get the drive to anywhere near normality.
And I also found that there is also a point of diminishing returns with the XP defrag as well, after 3 defrags, it will refuse to defrag any further.

Sorry Greg,
To answer your original question,
If you didn't need to defrag your disk, why then did XP come with the Disk Defragmenter application?
I'm pretty sure it wasn't put in there for the fun of it, or was it?
_________________________
Let's face it, these days if you're not young, you're old - Red Green grin

Top
#178788 - 06/11/08 09:23 PM Re: Better De-fragging [Re: Trumpy]
gfretwell Offline

Member

Registered: 07/20/04
Posts: 9012
Loc: Estero,Fl,usa
I guess I still don't understand why people stop using FAT then. Other than the 4 gig file limit and bad disk usage with small files I am not sure what the down side is.
I sure like being able to boot a diskette and see my drives when I am having trouble.
_________________________
Greg Fretwell

Top



ECN Electrical Forums - sponsored by Electrical Contractor Network - Electrical and Code Related Discussion for Electrical Contractors, Electricians, Inspectors, Instructors, Engineers and other related Professionals