ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
Admin 17
Recent Posts
Old decora style outlets
by Admin. 03/25/17 11:40 AM
ESA Arc flash course
by TheShockDoctors. 03/24/17 10:15 AM
fuse rejectors
by HotLine1. 03/24/17 07:53 AM
Another Forum Update
by Admin. 03/22/17 03:04 PM
Dining room plugs
by watersparkfalls. 03/21/17 10:31 PM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
231,496 Are you busy
166,206 Re: Forum
160,653 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 53 guests, and 15 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
#176393 - 03/31/08 11:04 AM Farm distribution question  
EV607797  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 745
Fredericksburg, VA, USA
I'm vaguely familiar with older farm setups where a service is installed on a pole with a central meter. In the few of these that I've seen, they've used a feed-through outdoor panel. The feed-through lugs feed the largest of the farm buildings and smaller buildings are fed from breakers in the feed-through panel. I also see plenty of manufactured homes set up this way to provide power to heat pumps, etc. That part makes perfect sense to me.

In this case, I am trying to help my neighbor who has an older farm. I know that the way they had it done originally was wrong. He has a meter and a standard raintight fused disconnect at the pole. From there, they ran 2" PVC to the house with three 4/0 aluminum for the 150 amp service in the house. This work dates back to the early 1970's. Even that part was done correctly until it came time to feed the other buildings. Since it's just a standard 200 amp disconnect, they just installed multiple lugs on the load side and used them to feed multiple buildings, some with even simple 12/2 UF cable. I talked him into getting rid of that stuff, which he did. Still, there is only one single neutral set of neutral lugs with a simple "one in, one out" capability. There is one small lug to allow for the GEC which is there. There's no way to add any more conductors to this block without multiple taps. I thought about replacing the neutral block with one containing more lugs, but then I would be getting into altering a listed assembly.

Now he's building a new greenhouse and wants to install a 60 amp panel in there (he's already installed it). I told him that we really need to run 6/3 UF cable to the panel in the house to do it properly. He's fairly insistent that we just come off of the original main 200 amp disconnect like the other ones had been done. He's trying to save money on cable, plus he's fearful of digging something up going back to the house. I've told him that I'm not willing to do this unless he invests in a feed-through panel that contains the appropriate lugs and overall design. I'm all in favor of helping him save money and I'll do what I can, but I can't see how to legally come off of the main disconnect.

I could understand if we were talking about parallel conductors or if all of them were rated for the full 200 amps, but this is not the case this time. Would this type of installation qualify for a tap rule exception? It's a lot more than 25 feet from the disconnect to the greenhouse. Again, I know that "farm tap" rules had all kinds of exceptions, but I think that those are all but gone in today's NEC.

I've never done any work on a farm, so I want to make sure that the guidance that I'm giving him against this approach is correct. If there are any exceptions, I'd sure be interested to know about them. Thanks!


---Ed---

"But the guy at Home Depot said it would work."

2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides

#176396 - 03/31/08 12:02 PM Re: Farm distribution question [Re: EV607797]  
electure  Offline


Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,259
Fullerton, CA USA
The tap may comply with ('05 NEC): 240.21(B(5) "Outside Taps of Unlimited Length.
Where the conductors are located outdoors of a building or structure, except at the point of load termination, and comply with all of the following conditions:."
It goes on to list the conditions that must be met.

There's about 20 various "tap exceptions" 240.21 addresses them


#176400 - 03/31/08 01:21 PM Re: Farm distribution question [Re: electure]  
gfretwell  Offline


Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,057
Estero,Fl,usa
To answer the neutral bus question you need to get you magnifying class and read all the kits listed on the panel label. There may be a kit for that panel that will expand the neutral bus ... if you can find one.


Greg Fretwell

#176404 - 03/31/08 03:29 PM Re: Farm distribution question [Re: gfretwell]  
leland  Offline
Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 853
Lowell area, Ma. USA
I am also unfamiliar with the set up.
Would a split bolt (burndy) be acceptable on the neutral?


#176434 - 04/01/08 04:06 PM Re: Farm distribution question [Re: leland]  
electure  Offline


Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,259
Fullerton, CA USA
Split bolts aren't made to accommodate more than 2 conductors.


(I hate to think about how many times I violated this before I knew.)




Member Spotlight
Bill Addiss
Bill Addiss
NY, USA
Posts: 3,875
Joined: October 2000
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.018s Queries: 15 (0.004s) Memory: 0.7696 MB (Peak: 0.9110 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-03-26 13:02:32 UTC