ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
Admin 16
Recent Posts
ESA Arc flash course
by TheShockDoctors. 03/24/17 10:15 AM
fuse rejectors
by HotLine1. 03/24/17 07:53 AM
Another Forum Update
by Admin. 03/22/17 03:04 PM
Dining room plugs
by watersparkfalls. 03/21/17 10:31 PM
TRUE POWER
by jraef. 03/21/17 09:13 PM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
231,331 Are you busy
166,070 Re: Forum
160,532 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 88 guests, and 12 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
#175951 - 03/15/08 07:31 PM Cable Tray Derateing Of Parallel 500 kcmil conduc  
Yoopersup  Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 822
Michigan
392.8 (d) conductors in cable tay Paralleled Shall be Grouped.
392.11 (B)(2) single conductors 1/0 to 500 kcmil grouped shall be derated at 65% per tables 310.17 -310.18 .
tray no cover free air copper 500 kcmil=(700amp at 90%c) (for derateing only)x 65% = 455 amps per group.

Unless installed with free air space per 392.11 (b)(4)then table 310.20 (500 kcmil=580amps at 90c )

Wanna check my work guys ???
YoopersUp





2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides

#176283 - 03/28/08 10:04 AM Re: Cable Tray Derateing Of Parallel 500 kcmil conduc [Re: Yoopersup]  
Yoopersup  Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 822
Michigan
??????????
Nobody does this type of work???


#176285 - 03/28/08 01:25 PM Re: Cable Tray Derateing Of Parallel 500 kcmil conduc [Re: Yoopersup]  
SteveFehr  Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,198
Chesapeake, VA
Just use a bigger tray laugh Grouping doesn't mean they have to be bundled, you just need to run the whole group together in a single tray (or parallel trays are OK too, I believe). If you can leave a cable diameter between the 500kcmil cables, you don't need to derate at all. I've often seen them tie-wrap cables to the trays to maintain spacing. Looks cheap with all the tie-wraps (IMHO), but very clean, and is very effective at maintaining spacing.

I really don't see why NEC would specifically disapply 310.15(B)(2) though, it doesn't make sense, and 65% is a HARSH derating. Ask your AHJ, they may be lenient about minimum cable space to avoid derating- I know I sure am on cable spacing in venetilated trays.

Alas, I won't have to worry about this anymore- as of 2008, 708.10(C) specifically prohibits it for my sites, even when the EMI environment will allow open tray. All RMC from now on, I suppose. Maybe the occassionally SCH80 duct bank...

Last edited by SteveFehr; 03/28/08 01:35 PM.


Member Spotlight
richard
richard
L.I. New York
Posts: 94
Joined: August 2003
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.015s Queries: 15 (0.004s) Memory: 0.7503 MB (Peak: 0.8773 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-03-24 17:57:10 UTC