ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
Admin 16
Recent Posts
ESA Arc flash course
by TheShockDoctors. 03/24/17 10:15 AM
fuse rejectors
by HotLine1. 03/24/17 07:53 AM
Another Forum Update
by Admin. 03/22/17 03:04 PM
Dining room plugs
by watersparkfalls. 03/21/17 10:31 PM
TRUE POWER
by jraef. 03/21/17 09:13 PM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
231,317 Are you busy
166,058 Re: Forum
160,525 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 78 guests, and 10 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#174176 - 01/28/08 02:06 PM Upgrade  
JValdes  Offline
Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 301
South Carolina
I have a garage and a house. They are connected by a breezeway. The garage is now considered attached. I want to put a 400 amp panel in the garage. I want to make the 200 amp house panel a sub panel. The garage has no water pipes. The house main panel is bonded to the water pipes. I plan to drive two electrodes at the new 400 amp service in the garage, and pipe a four wire new run to the house panel. Do I have to run a bonding (water pipe) conductor to the house? If so, can I connect the bonding conductor to the isolated ground (bonded and grounded) in the 200 amp sub panel? There is an electrode at the house that is now my sub panel. The neutral and ground will be seperated.
If I must run a (water pipe) bonding wire to the house, can I run it in the conduit with the other four conductors?
Also, Should I size the bonding conductor for 200 amp or 400 amp. I appreciate any comments or suggestions.....John


Work Gear for Electricians and the Trades

#174181 - 01/28/08 04:23 PM Re: Upgrade [Re: JValdes]  
ITO  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 348
Texas
Why do you want a 400A panel in the garage, and will your local POCO even let you put one that big on your garage?


101° Rx = + /_\

#174202 - 01/29/08 02:07 AM Re: Upgrade [Re: ITO]  
gfretwell  Offline


Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,057
Estero,Fl,usa
I see no reason why you need more than the 4 wire feeder. The water pipe is bonded to the ground rods via the EGC in the feeder.


Greg Fretwell

#174248 - 01/30/08 05:05 AM Re: Upgrade [Re: gfretwell]  
u2slow  Offline
Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 200
Salt Spring, BC, Canada
Originally Posted by gfretwell
I see no reason why you need more than the 4 wire feeder. The water pipe is bonded to the ground rods via the EGC in the feeder.


I agree. I did exactly the same install on my house a couple years ago - just with a 200A main and 100A existing in the house. That satisfied the inspector.


#174254 - 01/30/08 11:33 AM Re: Upgrade [Re: u2slow]  
JValdes  Offline
Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 301
South Carolina
That is why I posted the question. I too assumed that the EGC and EMT would allow for a four wire feeder to the 200 amp sub panel. But I am getting conflicting advise on this matter. Several members at the Mike Holt forum have indicated that I need a bonding conductor seperate from the feeder to the sub panel, to go all the way to the house unbroken and connected to the water line at the house. Just as if the new service was at the house. I have also been advised that I can go with a three wire feeder since I am using EMT. I am going to contact the inspector and see what he requires. thanks for your feedback fellow forum members.......John

ps....400 amp service is needed for the new testing facility that will be in the garage.


#174258 - 01/30/08 05:56 PM Re: Upgrade [Re: JValdes]  
LK  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,429
New Jersey
The way I see it the main panel at the garage will need a GEC going unbroken back to the water meter.


#174259 - 01/30/08 06:09 PM Re: Upgrade [Re: LK]  
u2slow  Offline
Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 200
Salt Spring, BC, Canada
Its going to bubble down to what the inspector wants to see.

What my inspector said was he is no longer considering the water supply as a ground. It simply needs to be bonded along with the gas supply.

That said, I do not have water or gas in the garage area. They are contained to the house where it is served by the existing panel. So that may be a factor.


#174274 - 01/30/08 11:29 PM Re: Upgrade [Re: u2slow]  
Active 1  Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 687
Grayslake IL, USA
Like LK said if it's an attached garage.


#174282 - 01/31/08 02:44 AM Re: Upgrade [Re: Active 1]  
gfretwell  Offline


Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,057
Estero,Fl,usa
I suppose it gets down to what 250.64(C) exception means
Quote
Exception: Sections of busbars shall be permitted to be connected together to form a grounding electrode conductor
.

It doesn't say "busbars in the same enclosure"


Greg Fretwell

#174286 - 01/31/08 07:48 AM Re: Upgrade [Re: LK]  
SteveFehr  Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,198
Chesapeake, VA
Originally Posted by LK
The way I see it the main panel at the garage will need a GEC going unbroken back to the water meter.
Unbroken, OR spliced via busbars or exothermic welds. Routing the GEC through the existing panel's busbar is acceptable per 250.64. In this case, the ground between the two panels is an GEC and must be a discrete wire sized IAW 250.66.

That said, the GEC is still required to be as short and straight as possible*, so the AHJ may feel routing through the old panel is unnecessarily circuitous and may require a more direct connection between the new panel and ground. In this case, the connection between the two panels is no longer a GEC, but merely an EGC, and EMT is acceptable if properly bonded.

* 250.4(A)(1) became stricter about this in NEC 2008.


Page 1 of 2 1 2

Member Spotlight
renosteinke
renosteinke
Blue Collar Country
Posts: 5,316
Joined: January 2005
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.024s Queries: 16 (0.005s) Memory: 0.8168 MB (Peak: 0.9971 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-03-24 15:55:42 UTC