The Electrical Contractor Network

ECN Electrical Forum
Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

Books, Tools and Test Equipment for Electrical and Construction Trades

Register Now!

Register Now!

We want your input!


2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Recent Posts
Son of Sparky
by HotLine1
Yesterday at 07:43 PM
Speaking of Plugmold ...
by gfretwell
10/17/16 02:37 PM
Broken battery charger? Check for cobwebs!
by gfretwell
10/17/16 02:30 PM
230 or 345 kV transmission lines?
by annemarie1
10/12/16 01:23 PM
Is this a fix or just a bandaid?
by gfretwell
10/10/16 06:49 PM
New in the Gallery:
12.5A through 0.75mm˛ flex (just out of curiosity)
Shout Box

Top Posters (30 Days)
gfretwell 11
HotLine1 6
renosteinke 6
ghost307 5
sparky 4
Who's Online
1 registered (gfretwell), 244 Guests and 4 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 >
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#173035 - 12/31/07 04:25 PM something i thought i knew
trekkie76 Offline

Registered: 06/19/04
Posts: 219
Loc: baileyville, maine, usa
Ok I have utterly confused myself and I need some help. Why is it that we see amps go down as voltage goes up, such as motors, ballasts?
I am looking over a math book from my college days, and it says that voltage and amperage are directly proportional.

I thought the whole reason for increasing voltage to an end product was to reduce amps saving on wire size, etc?

Am I missing something stupid? I feel like I have writers block, you know when you can almost remember something? it is driving me nuts!!

#173043 - 01/01/08 03:00 AM Re: something i thought i knew [Re: trekkie76]
techie Offline

Registered: 05/17/05
Posts: 240
Loc: palo alto, ca usa

#173046 - 01/01/08 04:46 AM Re: something i thought i knew [Re: techie]
wire_twister Offline

Registered: 07/25/07
Posts: 265
Loc: Georgia USA
The way it was explained to me long years ago, Amps and volts are directly proportioal and opposite like being on either end of a see-saw when one goes up the other goes down. hope this clears things up

Life is tough, Life is tougher when you are stupid

#173049 - 01/01/08 06:37 AM Re: something i thought i knew [Re: wire_twister]
trekkie76 Offline

Registered: 06/19/04
Posts: 219
Loc: baileyville, maine, usa
Thanks guys. I didnt read far enough into the book. Once I got to the Watts section it all came back. Thanks again

#173052 - 01/01/08 08:00 AM Re: something i thought i knew [Re: trekkie76]
JoeTestingEngr Offline

Registered: 11/04/05
Posts: 786
Loc: Chicago, Il.
You should think of the current and voltage as being inversely proportional in cases where the power is the constant. That would include changing winding configurations in motors or transformers and switching power supplies. Think of a 24 volt control transformer that can have the primary windings in parallel for 120 VAC or in series for 240 VAC. Whether it might draw 1 amp in the first case or .5 amp in the second case, each winding still has 120 volts across it and .5 amp flowing through it. But yet the second case will likely be more efficient as a system because of less I squared R loss in getting to the point of use.

In the case of motor starting currents you're waiting for the motor to spin up and for the counter EMF to reduce winding currents. Here you shouldn't think of the voltage at the motor where you are observing it but at some point upstream before all the I^2 R loss that is the cause of the lower measurements.

Now if you have a purely resistive load, the current will vary directly with the voltage. Just don't think of nichrome heating elements as fitting into that classification since the resistance increases with temperature.
Happy New Year!

Edited by JoeTestingEngr (01/01/08 08:01 AM)

#173084 - 01/02/08 06:33 AM Re: something i thought i knew [Re: JoeTestingEngr]
Last Leg Offline

Registered: 05/04/05
Posts: 41
Loc: Houston, Texas
Just remember power factor. Motors run most efficiently at the voltage for which they were designed, not at +/- 5%.

#173098 - 01/02/08 02:00 PM Re: something i thought i knew [Re: Last Leg]
gabrielpacyna Offline
New Member

Registered: 10/17/07
Posts: 9
Loc: Poland, city: Niemodlin
And...with nominal shaft torque, I think.
The nominal rating is the optimal using of el. energy.

#173102 - 01/02/08 03:38 PM Re: something i thought i knew [Re: gabrielpacyna]
bb Offline
Junior Member

Registered: 09/02/06
Posts: 8
Loc: Pendleton, IN USA
For a fixed resistance, as voltage increases, current also increases. However, the reason that we increase voltage in order to decrease current is that with multi-tap ballasts or motors, the higher voltage windings have 4 times the resistance. This decreases the current by half.

#173104 - 01/02/08 04:18 PM Re: something i thought i knew [Re: bb]
gabrielpacyna Offline
New Member

Registered: 10/17/07
Posts: 9
Loc: Poland, city: Niemodlin
In my opinion we have to consider that motor try to maintain the nominal revolution.
And the all machine load the motor the constant mechanical power. If we lower the voltage motor try still maintain the mechanical power and the current has to rise and vice versa.
It is connected with E inducted in the motor in opposite to the U supply voltage.
It is most observed when the motor starts, current is the biggest. I=(U-E)/R, R is summary windings and line supply.
Sorry for my language, I am Polish.

#173126 - 01/03/08 04:27 AM Re: something i thought i knew [Re: gabrielpacyna]
SteveFehr Offline

Registered: 03/19/05
Posts: 1192
Loc: Chesapeake, VA
Oh come now, guys- you all know better than to look at a meter and believe P=IE and E=IR, that's as much a half-true myth as the Bohr model of the atom or newtonian physics. Not to mention the OP apparently fully understood the answer after the first response- that's just not right! This is the theory forum, needs more differential equations!


Or at least use the AC version instead of DC for rule-of-thumb calculations:

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 >

ECN Electrical Forums - sponsored by Electrical Contractor Network - Electrical and Code Related Discussion for Electrical Contractors, Electricians, Inspectors, Instructors, Engineers and other related Professionals