ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
Admin 16
Recent Posts
Another Forum Update
by Admin. 03/22/17 03:04 PM
Dining room plugs
by watersparkfalls. 03/21/17 10:31 PM
TRUE POWER
by jraef. 03/21/17 09:13 PM
WEG CFW-11 Frequency Inverter
by jraef. 03/21/17 08:50 PM
fuse rejectors
by HotLine1. 03/20/17 08:14 PM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
231,130 Are you busy
165,888 Re: Forum
160,442 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
1 registered members (HotLine1), 59 guests, and 11 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#170447 - 11/03/07 09:06 AM 210.52 Clear as Mud  
rowd  Offline
Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 31
Park Forest, Illinois, USA
In the illustration linked from the NEC it shows 4 feet between receptacles.The code states "Receptacle outlets shall be installed so that no point along the wall line is more than 600 mm (24 in.) measured horizontally from a receptacle outlet in that space."

Clear as mud. once again the NEC manages to make a ruling even more muddled than it ever was to begin with.


(1) Wall Counter-top Spaces. A receptacle outlet shall be installed at each wall counter-top space that is 300 mm (12 in.) or wider. Receptacle outlets shall be installed so that no point along the wall line is more than 600 mm (24 in.) measured horizontally from a receptacle outlet in that space. See related Illustration

Exception: Receptacle outlets shall not be required on a wall directly behind a range, counter-mounted cooking unit, or sink in the installation described in Figure 210.52(C)(1).

[Linked Image]


2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides

#170449 - 11/03/07 09:28 AM Re: 210.52 Clear as Mud [Re: rowd]  
rowd  Offline
Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 31
Park Forest, Illinois, USA
Sorry.....Here is the illustration

[Linked Image]


#170450 - 11/03/07 09:55 AM Re: 210.52 Clear as Mud [Re: rowd]  
JohnJ0906  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 65
Baltimore MD USA
Exactly what is unclear?


#170452 - 11/03/07 10:47 AM Re: 210.52 Clear as Mud [Re: JohnJ0906]  
renosteinke  Offline
Cat Servant
Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,316
Blue Collar Country
Seems pretty clear to me ... unless you are not sure how these things are measured.

Receptacle spacing is determined by measuring, as it were, along the baseboard (or, with counters, the backsplash). There is no allowance for the height a receptacle may be above the floor (or counter). Things that interrupt the 'usable' path (doors, sinks, ranges) are not included in the measure. If the path takes a turn, the measure follows the turn - as shown in that corner.

Legal line aside .... go buy a cheap toaster. If the cord can't reach a receptacle, you probably need to add one at that point.


#170481 - 11/04/07 09:48 AM Re: 210.52 Clear as Mud [Re: renosteinke]  
ghost307  Offline
Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 900
Chicago Illinois USA
I always figured that it was to make sure that there was always a receptacle within 2' of any point along the wall to go along with the standard length of appliance cords.

The 12" countertop rule probably arose because folks started putting a short piece of countertop between the stove and the end wall...and some genius ran an extention cord to it for the toaster.


Ghost307

#170495 - 11/04/07 03:41 PM Re: 210.52 Clear as Mud [Re: ghost307]  
Alan Nadon  Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 399
Elkhart, IN. USA
The key word is point. No point shall be more than 2 feet.
This same confusion occurs when receptacles in habitable rooms are to be no more than six feet from a point. The receptacles are twelve feet apart.


Alan--
If it was easy, anyone could do it.

#170514 - 11/04/07 09:50 PM Re: 210.52 Clear as Mud [Re: Alan Nadon]  
gfretwell  Offline


Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,056
Estero,Fl,usa
It should be noted, they say no point "along the wall line"...
It is not a radial sweep across the width of the counter.
I have heard arguments about corners.


Greg Fretwell

#170557 - 11/05/07 08:58 PM Re: 210.52 Clear as Mud [Re: gfretwell]  
Jim M  Offline
Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 457
Chestertown, MD, USA
I have heard of some that did not interpret this measurement as being along the back part of the countertop and actually wanted a receptacle mounted on the 24" depth of the side wall where the countertop meet the wall.


#170559 - 11/05/07 09:28 PM Re: 210.52 Clear as Mud [Re: Jim M]  
gfretwell  Offline


Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,056
Estero,Fl,usa
You just defined the argument. It doesn't say "back" wall. wink


Greg Fretwell

#171777 - 12/05/07 01:45 PM Re: 210.52 Clear as Mud [Re: gfretwell]  
SteveFehr  Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,198
Chesapeake, VA
Originally Posted by gfretwell
It should be noted, they say no point "along the wall line"...
It is not a radial sweep across the width of the counter.
I have heard arguments about corners.
I think it should be changed, though, to "any point on the counter" within 2', though. What good is a rule to allow 2' cords to be used anywhere if they still can only be used butted up against the wall?

I know, I know, counters are 2' deep, and we'd need a continuous outlet for this. Really, it begs the question ... why the $&#&#$^%$^ are they only 2' cords to begin with? Why can't I get a blender with a 4' cord and a lamp with a 12' cord? Why always the rinky short cord?


Page 1 of 2 1 2

Member Spotlight
Samurai
Samurai
Fl.
Posts: 46
Joined: May 2007
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.026s Queries: 16 (0.003s) Memory: 0.8177 MB (Peak: 0.9952 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-03-22 22:10:59 UTC