The Electrical Contractor Network

ECN Electrical Forum
Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

Books, Tools and Test Equipment for Electrical and Construction Trades

Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#165614 - 07/01/07 03:04 PM HVAC servicing requirements
renosteinke Offline
Cat Servant
Member

Registered: 01/22/05
Posts: 5305
Loc: Blue Collar Country
210.63 requires an accessible receptacle for servicing HVAC equipment.
210.70(A)(3) and 210.70(C) require a light for servicing the equipment.

Does the use of a 'keyless' lampholder, with a receptacle in the base, fulfill both of these requirements?


Top
Tools for Electricians:
#165632 - 07/01/07 07:20 PM Re: HVAC servicing requirements [Re: renosteinke]
LoneGunman Offline
Member

Registered: 10/02/05
Posts: 141
Loc: Florida
I think it meets code but I still don't like it, Ive seen too many of them mangled and pulling away from the box which could be solved by installing properly. Id rather see a duplex receptacle.

Top
#165636 - 07/01/07 08:18 PM Re: HVAC servicing requirements [Re: LoneGunman]
frenchelectrican Offline

Member

Registered: 02/06/03
Posts: 938
Loc: Wi/ Paris France { France for ...
that kind of switch i am not too conftable with it but i know it do meet the code but really IMO it should have real duplex repectale with GFCI that is more safer and also with the lumiaiare i think it will be more even safer have the lumiaire enclosed instead of bare bulb there in case some hit it by accident and light go out.

Merci, Marc
_________________________
Pas de problme,il marche n'est-ce pas?"(No problem, it works doesn't it?)


Top
#165641 - 07/01/07 11:01 PM Re: HVAC servicing requirements [Re: frenchelectrican]
NORCAL Offline
Member

Registered: 09/25/02
Posts: 807
If it has a pull chain, it not a keyless then.... )

Top
#166216 - 07/16/07 12:39 AM Re: HVAC servicing requirements [Re: renosteinke]
hardwareguy Offline
Member

Registered: 06/15/07
Posts: 50
Loc: Texas
I would say it TECHNICALLY meets requirements, but I don't like it.

I see three problems:
One, the bulb is not protected from breakage.
Second, the socket on those dinky things are sometimes not rated for even 15A.... 660W is common.
Last but not least: GFCI would have to be provided by an expensive breaker.

Top
#166226 - 07/16/07 05:51 AM Re: HVAC servicing requirements [Re: hardwareguy]
NORCAL Offline
Member

Registered: 09/25/02
Posts: 807
 Originally Posted By: hardwareguy
I would say it TECHNICALLY meets requirements, but I don't like it.

I see three problems:
One, the bulb is not protected from breakage.
Second, the socket on those dinky things are sometimes not rated for even 15A.... 660W is common.
Last but not least: GFCI would have to be provided by an expensive breaker.



Since when are attics required to have GFCI protection?

Top
#166229 - 07/16/07 06:52 AM Re: HVAC servicing requirements [Re: NORCAL]
Ann Brush Offline
Member

Registered: 12/27/05
Posts: 155
Loc: Ohia
Requirements have been met, yes

Top
#166234 - 07/16/07 08:52 AM Re: HVAC servicing requirements [Re: Ann Brush]
pauluk Offline
Member

Registered: 08/11/01
Posts: 7693
Loc: Norfolk, England
At least it appears that somebody shortened the chain. I wouldn't want to have the full chain dangling down right in front of an open disconnect.

Top
#166248 - 07/16/07 01:54 PM Re: HVAC servicing requirements [Re: pauluk]
renosteinke Offline
Cat Servant
Member

Registered: 01/22/05
Posts: 5305
Loc: Blue Collar Country
Hardwareguy, I believe that UL would test that receptacle to the same standard as any other receptacle ... which is not the same thing as using a screw-in adapter to the light socket.
IF such an adapter were used ... I think your point about the 600 watt limit would be on target, ant the receptacle would not qualify.

Paul - Sharp eye! Actually, over here the fixtures come with a short chain (as seen in the pic), and a simple string that attaches to the chain if you want a longer tail.

Top
#166317 - 07/17/07 05:58 PM Re: HVAC servicing requirements [Re: renosteinke]
ShockMe77 Offline
Member

Registered: 06/11/05
Posts: 823
Loc: Rahway, New Jersey
Yes, this installation meets the requirements of 210.63 and 210.70(A)(3). The pullchain w/ grounded receptacle is a quick and easy way to meet code. You're in, you're out, especially when that attic is HOT!!

Top
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >



ECN Electrical Forums - sponsored by Electrical Contractor Network - Electrical and Code Related Discussion for Electrical Contractors, Electricians, Inspectors, Instructors, Engineers and other related Professionals