ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#161994 - 04/11/07 09:58 AM Communications
RSmike Offline
Member
Registered: 11/27/02
Posts: 134
Loc: Holland, MI USA
Is running a shielded twisted pair communications cable (CAN-bus operating at 5-24vdc) along with a SO cord 18/3 (operating at 3A - 120VAC) inside the same liquid tight flexible nonmetallic conduit (LFNC) a legal installation with respect to NPFA70-2005? With respect to NPFA79-2007?

Put on your thinking caps gentlemen,

RSLater,
RSmike
Top
2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
#162001 - 04/11/07 03:05 PM Re: Communications [Re: RSmike]
iwire Offline
Moderator
Registered: 01/05/03
Posts: 4391
Loc: North Attleboro, MA USA
SO Cord can not be installed in a raceway.
_________________________
Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts
Top
#162011 - 04/11/07 05:05 PM Re: Communications [Re: iwire]
EV607797 Offline
Member
Registered: 10/25/06
Posts: 744
Loc: Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Unless all conductors, not cables, are rated for the maximum voltage in use within the raceway, then this type of installation isn't permitted. My question would be how these circuits are separated at the ends of the liquid-tight since any approved enclosure would have separate high and low-voltage compartments?

I'd go with the shielded communications cable routed outside of the liquid-tight and run THHN, etc. inside.
_________________________
---Ed---

"But the guy at Home Depot said it would work."
Top
#162012 - 04/11/07 05:14 PM Re: Communications [Re: EV607797]
JBD Offline
Member
Registered: 07/12/01
Posts: 599
Loc: WI, USA
Originally Posted By EV607797
My question would be how these circuits are separated at the ends of the liquid-tight since any approved enclosure would have separate high and low-voltage compartments?


There are many industrial enclosures which contain PLCs and/or drives that use CANBUS for communications that do not have separated LV compartments.

This sounds like a Class 1 or Class 2 application although <24V communications circuits are not always "power limited".


Edited by JBD (04/11/07 05:17 PM)
Top
#162021 - 04/11/07 07:55 PM Re: Communications [Re: JBD]
George Little Offline
Member
Registered: 01/18/04
Posts: 1488
Loc: Michigan USA
Communications wiring and Power wiring are not permitted in the same raceway I don't care what the insulation ratings are. Article 800 Section 800.133 NFPA70 2005 Edition.
_________________________
George Little
Top
#162032 - 04/12/07 06:37 AM Re: Communications [Re: George Little]
RSmike Offline
Member
Registered: 11/27/02
Posts: 134
Loc: Holland, MI USA
Unless I missed it I also don't see NPFA70 allowing this or it's not specifically stated.

However, I read NPFA79 13.1.3 as allowing this; comments?

RSLater,
RSmike

Top
#162033 - 04/12/07 07:10 AM Re: Communications [Re: George Little]
JBD Offline
Member
Registered: 07/12/01
Posts: 599
Loc: WI, USA
Originally Posted By George Little
Communications wiring and Power wiring are not permitted in the same raceway I don't care what the insulation ratings are. Article 800 Section 800.133 NFPA70 2005 Edition.


Here we go with terminology.

CAN bus is normally used for interconnecting automation devices which is is probably a 725 remote-control and signalling application. 725.55(D) and 725.55(E) have provisions for mixing Class 2 and Class 3 circuits with other wiring.

Article 800 is for "central station systems" like telephones. However, 830 address networks so 830.133(A)(1)(d) Excpt #1 may be applicable.

Top
#162038 - 04/12/07 08:11 AM Re: Communications [Re: JBD]
RSmike Offline
Member
Registered: 11/27/02
Posts: 134
Loc: Holland, MI USA
725.55(D)(2)a - makes me a happy person.

What about SO cord in LFNC? Why is this not allowed? It terminates so well into the operator interface terminal device I'm powering. THHN is cheaper so I'll probably do that.

RSthanks,
RSmike
Top
#162047 - 04/12/07 09:58 AM Re: Communications [Re: RSmike]
gfretwell Offline


Member
Registered: 07/20/04
Posts: 9039
Loc: Estero,Fl,usa
George isn't class 1 OK in the raceway with the circuit(s) it controls?
I agree class 2/3 is not.
I suppose the real question is whether CanBus is a class 1 compliant wiring method
_________________________
Greg Fretwell
Top
#162058 - 04/12/07 12:09 PM Re: Communications [Re: gfretwell]
George Little Offline
Member
Registered: 01/18/04
Posts: 1488
Loc: Michigan USA
Greg- The original post only said Communication cable which put me in Article 800. I don't really know what CanBus is and maybe you are correct. Don't sound to me like 725 is even involved. Maybe I don't know what I'm talking about. The Scope of 800 is Communication Circuits and so that's where I went. Straighten this old man out smile
_________________________
George Little
Top
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >

Member Spotlight
Member Since: 02/23/13
Posts: 204
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box


Who's Online
0 registered (), 51 Guests and 9 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
 
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
 
Top Posters (30 Days)
Admin 47
HotLine1 43
gfretwell 19
Ruben Rocha 12
Trumpy 9
 
Newest Members
Scotto, Freecrowder, clee512, Jdscott2005, FAIZAN

ECN Electrical Forums - sponsored by Electrical Contractor Network - Electrical and Code Related Discussion for Electrical Contractors, Electricians, Inspectors, Instructors, Engineers and other related Professionals