ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
Admin 16
Recent Posts
ESA Arc flash course
by TheShockDoctors. 03/24/17 10:15 AM
fuse rejectors
by HotLine1. 03/24/17 07:53 AM
Another Forum Update
by Admin. 03/22/17 03:04 PM
Dining room plugs
by watersparkfalls. 03/21/17 10:31 PM
TRUE POWER
by jraef. 03/21/17 09:13 PM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
231,369 Are you busy
166,092 Re: Forum
160,560 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 59 guests, and 11 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
#161537 - 04/04/07 02:38 AM photo cell 208v  
aldav53  Offline
Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 545
Chandler, AZ USA
Is it legal to install a 208v photo cell so it switches one side of the 2 phases? I would think running it through a 2 or 4 pole contactor to switch both sides would be better. I found one done this way and think they had trouble with it, (not to mention that one side would still be hot if you were working on it). It was for some parking lot lights. I put a contactor controlled by a photo cell on it.


The Golden Rule - "The man with the gold makes the rule"

2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides

#161562 - 04/04/07 11:38 AM Re: photo cell 208v [Re: aldav53]  
gfretwell  Offline


Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,057
Estero,Fl,usa
410.48 and 410.54 seem to support that view


Greg Fretwell

#161566 - 04/04/07 12:34 PM Re: photo cell 208v [Re: gfretwell]  
George Little  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,489
Michigan USA
Good Call Greg. I learned something today.


George Little

#161568 - 04/04/07 01:02 PM Re: photo cell 208v [Re: George Little]  
yanici  Offline
Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 58
Atlantis
Yeah, Greg. I tried to find a way to get around opening both legs and even went to some photocell manufactures sites. Looks like aldav53 is correct.


#161576 - 04/04/07 03:54 PM Re: photo cell 208v [Re: yanici]  
gfretwell  Offline


Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,057
Estero,Fl,usa
My first guess was it might be OK if you had a 2 pole disconnect in front of the photocell but I don't see the language that supports it. I know you can have some types of equipment that allow this for control only (with a real disconnect present) but "lamp holders" and ED lighting does not seem to be included. If the installation was such that it was clear that the future maintainer could relamp safely I might be softer on this ruling.


Greg Fretwell

#161616 - 04/05/07 08:09 AM Re: photo cell 208v [Re: gfretwell]  
Tom  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,044
Shinnston, WV USA
I've seen plenty of HPS & Metal Halide floods & wallpacks that were supplied by 208 volt or 240 branch circuits and were individually controlled by a photocell. Since these fixtures came from the factory that way and are UL listed, I think the second paragraph of 90.7 would allow a factory installed photocell to switch just one energized conductor.

Of course, if you're the AHJ, it is up to you to approve equipment, listed or not.110.2


Few things are harder to put up with than the annoyance of a good example.

#161626 - 04/05/07 11:56 AM Re: photo cell 208v [Re: Tom]  
gfretwell  Offline


Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,057
Estero,Fl,usa
A lot of things go on inside listed products that we would not allow in field assembled equipment. I suppose it would really come down to your AHJ's definition of "switching device". If you called the PC something else and there was a real 2 pole switch present for safe relamping, I would not be all that concerned.


Greg Fretwell


Member Spotlight
BEAMEUP
BEAMEUP
WA
Posts: 27
Joined: December 2004
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.014s Queries: 15 (0.002s) Memory: 0.7836 MB (Peak: 0.9396 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-03-25 01:56:56 UTC