ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#160703 - 03/24/07 03:41 PM 3 Phase 480 parallel runs.....
Grover Offline
Member
Registered: 01/19/05
Posts: 109
Loc: Sebago, ME, USA
I've posted about this before, but a new twist.

Spec'd out; pipe on site, ready to dig and bury. Customer wants to increase amperage - future capacity. Loads are all motors - 2 soft start.

Spec'd at 1290A - 3 parallel 4" RMC runs, each containg A,B,C,N,G - 500 MCM Cu + 1 3/0 G.

He now wants 1600A. My solution: 4th pipe run - give me 1720A; he wants to add wire to the planned 3 runs.

Fill factor is ok to add 4th wire, but it would lead to A,A,B,C,N in pipe 1, A,B,B,C,N in pipe 2 and so on. I was always taught (in RMC)to keep A,B,C,N together in each pipe, or you end up with a "shorted turn" effect due to any imbalance, and heat up the pipe.

All I can find in a first look is Article 300.20 - "all phase conductors shall be grouped together".

Advice? Comments? Analysis? Pointers?

Thanks!
Top
Work Gear for Electricians and the Trades
#160705 - 03/24/07 04:23 PM Re: 3 Phase 480 parallel runs..... [Re: Grover]
trekkie76 Offline
Member
Registered: 06/19/04
Posts: 220
Loc: baileyville, maine, usa
You shouldnt have any induction problems as all the phases and neutral are present in each conduit. You should make sure the paralleled conductors are hte same length and size. Also, why not use the RMC as the ground?
Top
#160708 - 03/24/07 04:49 PM Re: 3 Phase 480 parallel runs..... [Re: Grover]
resqcapt19 Offline
Member
Registered: 11/10/00
Posts: 2148
Loc: IL
You cannot run the conductors like that. It is a violation of 310.4 and will produce excessive heat. Also you don't have enough copper with 3 runs of 500kcmil for 1290 amps...that is only good for 1140 amps. You have to use the 75° column for this application unless all of the terminations are listed for 90°....very unlikely.
Don
Top
#160710 - 03/24/07 04:57 PM Re: 3 Phase 480 parallel runs..... [Re: resqcapt19]
resqcapt19 Offline
Member
Registered: 11/10/00
Posts: 2148
Loc: IL
You could make it work for 1600 amps with 8 350 kcmil in each raceway, assuming that the grounded conductor is not required to be counted as a current carrying conductor. The 90° ampacity of 350 is 350 amps and we can use that for purpose of derating. The derated ampacity would be 280 amps and 6 conductors at 280 gives you a total ampacity of 1680 amps. Ten 350 kcmil THWN-2 will fit in the 4" rigid so you will have room for the EGC. Note that it will have to be a 4/0 for each raceway.
Don
Top
#160728 - 03/25/07 04:14 AM Re: 3 Phase 480 parallel runs..... [Re: resqcapt19]
iwire Offline
Moderator
Registered: 01/05/03
Posts: 4391
Loc: North Attleboro, MA USA
I agree with both of Don's posts.

I do have a question, do you need an EGC at all?

You did not say if this was a service or a feeder. If it's a service you can, and should drop the EGC from the plan.


Edited by iwire (03/25/07 04:14 AM)
_________________________
Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts
Top
#160830 - 03/26/07 01:06 PM Re: 3 Phase 480 parallel runs..... [Re: iwire]
trekkie76 Offline
Member
Registered: 06/19/04
Posts: 220
Loc: baileyville, maine, usa
why would there be any heat from induction with all the phases present?
Top
#160835 - 03/26/07 03:10 PM Re: 3 Phase 480 parallel runs..... [Re: trekkie76]
resqcapt19 Offline
Member
Registered: 11/10/00
Posts: 2148
Loc: IL
trekkie,
Quote:
why would there be any heat from induction with all the phases present?

You have more than just all phases in each conduit...you have an extra conductor from a single phase with no conductors of the other phases to cancel the fields. This would be the same as putting A in one conduit and B in another conduit. Remember this is a ferrous metal conduit. If the conduit was non-ferrous, you would not have the heating problem, but there still would be a violation of 310.4.
_________________________
Don(resqcapt19)
Top
#160869 - 03/27/07 03:22 AM Re: 3 Phase 480 parallel runs..... [Re: resqcapt19]
Grover Offline
Member
Registered: 01/19/05
Posts: 109
Loc: Sebago, ME, USA
Thanks for all the input & comments gang.

Everything is in a state of "flux" <grin> with the customer right now..... cost vs. extra/future capacity....

Grov
Top
#160893 - 03/27/07 10:01 AM Re: 3 Phase 480 parallel runs..... [Re: Grover]
trekkie76 Offline
Member
Registered: 06/19/04
Posts: 220
Loc: baileyville, maine, usa
yes but it is the A phase from the same system, which has the B,C,and N in the conduit. How would they not cancel out the magnetic effects in the condiut?
Top
#160894 - 03/27/07 10:08 AM Re: 3 Phase 480 parallel runs..... [Re: trekkie76]
LarryC Offline
Member
Registered: 07/05/04
Posts: 780
Loc: Winchester, NH, US
ASSume you have 100 Amps per phase CONDUCTOR. That will give 200 A phase A flux (2 conductors), 100 A phase B flux, 100 A phase C flux. The flux due to 100 Amps of A + B + C will cancel, but you still have an EXTRA 100 A of phase A flux. There is no more phase B or C flux to cancel it out.


Hello Hot pipe.
Top

Member Spotlight
Member Since: 04/03/02
Posts: 6776
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box


Who's Online
0 registered (), 50 Guests and 8 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
 
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
 
Top Posters (30 Days)
Admin 51
HotLine1 43
gfretwell 17
Trumpy 16
Ruben Rocha 13
 
Newest Members
clee512, Jdscott2005, FAIZAN, Regitest2, sureshazhagai

ECN Electrical Forums - sponsored by Electrical Contractor Network - Electrical and Code Related Discussion for Electrical Contractors, Electricians, Inspectors, Instructors, Engineers and other related Professionals