ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
Admin 16
Recent Posts
Another Forum Update
by Admin. 03/22/17 03:04 PM
Dining room plugs
by watersparkfalls. 03/21/17 10:31 PM
TRUE POWER
by jraef. 03/21/17 09:13 PM
WEG CFW-11 Frequency Inverter
by jraef. 03/21/17 08:50 PM
fuse rejectors
by HotLine1. 03/20/17 08:14 PM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
231,218 Are you busy
165,932 Re: Forum
160,462 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 57 guests, and 10 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#157701 - 12/24/05 11:53 AM Data on Hazard of FPE Panels  
VinceR  Offline
Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 35
Edgewood, WA, USA
Recently, we have been asked to bid on replacing Federal Pacific Electric “Stab-Lock” panels. In the course of the preparing the bid, the homeowners have asked for our opinion as to the degree of danger presented by FPE panels. I know that these panels are a hazard and we strongly recommend replacing them. Does anyone have any source data say from UL that we could provide homeowners so they have accurate up to date information so they can make an informed decision re replacement?

Thanks and Merry Christmas to all!


Business, Office, Estimating, Legal:

#157702 - 12/24/05 12:17 PM Re: Data on Hazard of FPE Panels  
Speedy Petey  Offline
Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 173
Upstate, NY
Here is what has become the standard link regarding FPE breakers.
Note the link to the CPSC study on them.


FPE panels


Speedy Petey

"Anyone who has never made a mistake has never tried anything new." -Albert Einstein

#157703 - 12/24/05 12:36 PM Re: Data on Hazard of FPE Panels  
jwhite  Offline
Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 64
Trenton, NC, USA
Google FPE and you will get tons of stuff.
pay note the ones that say, even using replacement breakers does not help.


#157704 - 12/25/05 01:22 PM Re: Data on Hazard of FPE Panels  
renosteinke  Offline
Cat Servant
Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,316
Blue Collar Country
I'm getting a little weary of the anti-FPE hysteria.

The study so freely circulated on the internet was NOT supported by further CPSC studies. There was never a recall, and they never lost their UL listing.
All breakers submitted to UL have to pass the same exact tests. Some may be eaasier to use, or be of better design- but they pass the same standard tests as regard "safety."

Replacement breakers are another issue. "Unique Breakkers," sold in the US, are not UL listed, and it's anyone's guess as to the meaning of the "ETL" tag on them. The ones manufactureed by Schneider for the Canadian market are, in fact, listed by UL-Canada.

For an opposing point of view regarding FPE, I suggest a search of back issues of "IAEI News." IAEI is the electrical inspectors' association- and they are no where near as concerned as some other groups.

FPE panels may not be my favcorite, but their presence is no reason to panic.


#157705 - 12/25/05 01:31 PM Re: Data on Hazard of FPE Panels  
jwhite  Offline
Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 64
Trenton, NC, USA
renosteinke. When I was a new helper I watched as a journeyman held a hot to ground from an FPE panel without the breaker tripping. I personally have turned them on and heard them humm and not trip till I was compelled by fear to turn the breaker off. Reciently a co-worker of my had a relay blow apart because of a short in the circuit when the FPE breaker did not clear the fault. I have held an amprobe on a circuit drawing 23 amps all day long, and the breaker never got hot enough to trip. (that one I might give you)

It is not just from reading stuff on the internet that I conclude that FPE breakers are a hazzard. It is also from experience.


#157706 - 01/01/06 10:47 PM Re: Data on Hazard of FPE Panels  
kdal  Offline
Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34
Florida,U.S.A.


#157707 - 01/15/06 04:56 PM Re: Data on Hazard of FPE Panels  
Rewired  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 558
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
I think that FPE breakers manufactured in the U.S for U.S installations are different internally ... I have NEVER heard of an FPE breaker not tripping here in Canada.. I will be the first to admit they are SLOW to trip but they do trip and no damage results... I have heard the same story from a neighbour and electrician regarding other manufacturers whereby they have had dead shorts and the breaker did no more than hum!
" Fires caused because the breaker didnt trip"??? Maybe there was not enough current to actually trip the breaker?? Maybe there was arcing ( hence the manufacture and use of arc fault breakers!)...

I have seen piles of these breakers installed and I have seen them trip when required under short circuits or overloads ( at least they do here in Canada!)
A.D


#157708 - 01/16/06 08:32 PM Re: Data on Hazard of FPE Panels  
kiwisholland  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 27
ETL is a competitor of UL, that does the same type of testing that UL does. They are not as well known or accepted, especially by AHJ's


#157709 - 03/14/06 04:03 PM Re: Data on Hazard of FPE Panels  
trevman  Offline
Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 47
canada
I live in canada and once cut a 15a cct bx cable oops wrecked my pliers fpe black skinny stablok brkr did not trip even after i shorted it to ground a 2nd time.


#157710 - 03/17/06 12:54 PM Re: Data on Hazard of FPE Panels  
ayrton  Offline
Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 201
Pa
"I personally have turned them on and heard them humm and not trip till I was compelled by fear to turn the breaker off."
[Quote]jwwhite


Siemens (ITE) and GE will do the same things when old! Have not experienced it personnaly with SquareD, but it wouldnt surprise me.


Page 1 of 2 1 2

Member Spotlight
Posts: 362
Joined: April 2003
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.016s Queries: 15 (0.003s) Memory: 0.8169 MB (Peak: 0.9934 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-03-23 12:22:21 UTC