The Electrical Contractor Network

ECN Electrical Forum
Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

Books, Tools and Test Equipment for Electrical and Construction Trades

Register Now!

Register Now!

We want your input!

Featured:
   

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

   
Recent Posts
Photo Upload Tutorial
by DanK
Yesterday at 11:35 PM
Sprinklered equipment 26-008
by bigpapa
12/02/16 04:24 PM
On Delay Relay with Auto Reset
by Potseal
12/01/16 09:59 AM
Wow, that was close!
by jraef
11/28/16 07:06 PM
Earthquake in New Zeeland
by RODALCO
11/27/16 11:25 PM
New in the Gallery:
12.5A through 0.75mm˛ flex (just out of curiosity)
Shout Box

Top Posters (30 Days)
gfretwell 13
HotLine1 9
Texas_Ranger 8
sparkyinak 7
Trumpy 6
Who's Online
1 registered (aussie240), 158 Guests and 6 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#154545 - 05/18/05 07:25 PM My "Wish List 2008"
renosteinke Offline
Cat Servant
Member

Registered: 01/22/05
Posts: 5305
Loc: Blue Collar Country
I'd like to see the following changes in the NEC:

1) I'd like to see 410.4C delete the word "commercial," and apply to all kitchen range hood lights;

2) I'd like to see 240.50, 51 reworded to say "overcurent protective device," rather than "fuses," as there are Edison-base circuit breakers out there;

3) I would like to see 408.4 edited to remove the requirements that circuits (in panels) be identified "in a circuit directory." This is in conflict with the first sentence, which specifies that such identification be "clear, evident, and specific."
"Directories" provided rarely contain sufficient space, they are often mounted in a position that is difficult to read, and they often have an arrangement that bears no relation to the arrangement of breakers in the panel. I assert that placing a lable directly next to, or even atop, the breaker provides a very clear way of identifying a circuit; in the case of a lable on the breaker, such identification is visible even when the cover is removed- and remains accurate as breakers are re-arranged.

Top
2014 / 2011 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
#154546 - 07/20/06 07:01 PM Re: My "Wish List 2008"
SolarPowered Offline
Member

Registered: 07/05/04
Posts: 615
Loc: Palo Alto, CA, USA
Reno, I note that the existing language calls for "a" circuit directory, not "the manufacturer-provided" circuit directory. You're free to ignore the one provided by the mfg and make your own. Since said directory is permitted to be on the face of a panelboard, I don't see that there's any legal impediment to placing a label "directly next to" each breaker. (On top of the breaker might be a problem, though.)

(Edited to add: I just saw your other post. It sounds like the code guys agree with me. )

[This message has been edited by SolarPowered (edited 07-20-2006).]

Top



ECN Electrical Forums - sponsored by Electrical Contractor Network - Electrical and Code Related Discussion for Electrical Contractors, Electricians, Inspectors, Instructors, Engineers and other related Professionals