The Electrical Contractor Network

ECN Electrical Forum
Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

Books, Tools and Test Equipment for Electrical and Construction Trades

Register Now!

Register Now!

We want your input!

Featured:
   

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

   
Recent Posts
Industrail Control Panel bonding per 409.108
by sparkyinak
Today at 06:29 PM
Calling all Non-US members!! (Non-US only)
by aussie240
12/07/16 02:39 AM
Photo Upload Tutorial
by DanK
12/06/16 11:35 PM
Sprinklered equipment 26-008
by bigpapa
12/02/16 04:24 PM
On Delay Relay with Auto Reset
by Potseal
12/01/16 09:59 AM
New in the Gallery:
12.5A through 0.75mm˛ flex (just out of curiosity)
Shout Box

Top Posters (30 Days)
gfretwell 13
HotLine1 10
sparkyinak 9
Texas_Ranger 8
Potseal 6
Who's Online
2 registered (sparkyinak, LongRunner), 90 Guests and 4 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#150761 - 10/15/05 07:49 PM Osha vs NEC
mbarnwatt Offline
Junior Member

Registered: 04/25/04
Posts: 1
Loc: Centennial, Colorado, USA
In Denver, we have recently run into an interesting problem with our local utility. Of course, the NEC requires
'230.24 Clearances
Service-drop conductors shall not be readily accessible and shall comply with 230.24(A) through (D) for services not over 600 volts, nominal.
(A) Above Roofs Conductors shall have a vertical clearance of not less than 2.5 m (8 ft) above the roof surface. The vertical clearance above the roof level shall be maintained for a distance of not less than 900 mm (3 ft) in all directions from the edge of the roof.'
Our utility provider, Xcel, has told us they can not hook-up these services because OSHA has prohibitted them from connecting to anything more than 5' above a "walkable roof" and a ladder on a roof is unacceptable. Needless to say, we have had to install several 9' masts with a point of attachment at 8.5' due to 230.24(A), have the AHJ inspect them, then lower the mast knob to 5', have the utility attach the service drop, then (third trip) push the mast knob back up to the required 8.5'. ????
Are there any others out there with similar problems and, if so, what have been your solutions, and if not, any comments?

Top
Arc Flash PPE Clothing, LOTO & Insulated Tools
#150762 - 10/15/05 08:14 PM Re: Osha vs NEC
Bill Addiss Offline
Member

Registered: 10/07/00
Posts: 4196
Loc: NY, USA
mbarnwatt,

Welcome to ECN,
I never had to do it, but our local utility allows a "Drop Swing" Service where the point of attachment is inaccessible (by their rules).

Maybe something along these lines would be acceptable. Look at Drawing D9 (page 11) in the following file:
http://www.lipower.org/pdfs/commercial/redbook/Chapter11.pdf

Bill

Top
#150763 - 10/27/05 06:56 PM Re: Osha vs NEC
Trumpy Offline

Member

Registered: 07/05/02
Posts: 8540
Loc: SI,New Zealand
mbarnwatt,

Welcome to ECN, mate!.

This is a rather interesting topic.
Let's bump it back up to the top.
_________________________
Let's face it, these days if you're not young, you're old - Red Green grin

Top



ECN Electrical Forums - sponsored by Electrical Contractor Network - Electrical and Code Related Discussion for Electrical Contractors, Electricians, Inspectors, Instructors, Engineers and other related Professionals