ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
Admin 19
Recent Posts
fuse rejectors
by NORCAL. 03/29/17 01:44 AM
Old decora style outlets
by NORCAL. 03/29/17 01:41 AM
NFPA stuff
by gfretwell. 03/28/17 08:08 PM
Anyone hiring inspectors?
by HotLine1. 03/27/17 08:03 AM
ESA Arc flash course
by TheShockDoctors. 03/24/17 10:15 AM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
231,734 Are you busy
166,637 Re: Forum
160,788 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 63 guests, and 13 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#147980 - 04/17/03 09:39 PM Electrical Accidents Info Centre (UK)  
Admin  Offline

Administrator
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,437
NY, USA
Look Here for Information:

ELECTRICAL ACCIDENTS INFORMATION CENTRE


Arc Flash PPE Clothing, LOTO & Insulated Tools

#147981 - 04/19/03 06:54 AM Re: Electrical Accidents Info Centre (UK)  
Trumpy  Offline


Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 8,211
SI,New Zealand
Just read a rather worrying fact on that site:
Quote
508 men with breast cancer took part in a research programme, 95% of these men were found to be Electrical workers

This is not good!.


Let's face it, these days if you're not young, you're old - Red Green grin

#147982 - 04/19/03 05:18 PM Re: Electrical Accidents Info Centre (UK)  
pauluk  Offline
Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 7,520
Norfolk, England
The only problem with all of these statistics is that you have to look carefully for any other common factors. Did they all come from the same area, for example, or did they all work at a particular place over the years?


#147983 - 04/20/03 06:16 PM Re: Electrical Accidents Info Centre (UK)  
Trumpy  Offline


Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 8,211
SI,New Zealand
There's a fact on that website, that I beg to differ with.
It states there, that Alternating current is 3 times more dangerous (shock-wise) than Direct current.
I would say that DC would be more dangerous,
because it has no "Current-Zero", and AC has a habit of throwing people away from contact, whereas with DC, your hands clench, and that's where they stay.
Also, I don't know where they got the arbitrary number of 3 from?
What are your thoughts on this?. [Linked Image]


Let's face it, these days if you're not young, you're old - Red Green grin

#147984 - 04/20/03 07:57 PM Re: Electrical Accidents Info Centre (UK)  
Bjarney  Offline
Moderator
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,527
West-Southern Inner-Northeast ...
FWIW, the US NEC formally considers ‘low voltage’ to be “…voltage no greater than 30 volts rms, 42 volts peak, or 60 volts dc.” The “60 volt” revision is a bit newer than the 30/42V limitation, and seems to have been a purely political move by The Bell System. IIRC, the submitted NEC proposal to bump up the DC value was accepted by the CMP without any significant substantiation several editions ago, primarily because telecomm central-office battery runs about 52-54 volts and the 42-volt limitation seems to have interfered with the “Bell Way of Doing Things.”


#147985 - 04/22/03 01:57 AM Re: Electrical Accidents Info Centre (UK)  
nesparky  Offline
Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 642
omaha,ne
Trumpy
Any time statistics are used, I always remember an old saying-- "there are lies, damn lies and statistics." [Linked Image]


[This message has been edited by nesparky (edited 04-22-2003).]


ed

#147986 - 04/22/03 02:14 AM Re: Electrical Accidents Info Centre (UK)  
Trumpy  Offline


Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 8,211
SI,New Zealand
nesparky,
Yeah, I guess you're right, never had it put as plainly as that before!. [Linked Image]


Let's face it, these days if you're not young, you're old - Red Green grin

#147987 - 04/22/03 03:35 PM Re: Electrical Accidents Info Centre (UK)  
pauluk  Offline
Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 7,520
Norfolk, England
If the statistics come from any government department, they probably have a margin of error of something like +/-5000%!


#147988 - 04/22/03 03:40 PM Re: Electrical Accidents Info Centre (UK)  
Bill Addiss  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,875
NY, USA
I think that the general problem with many statistics is that they are taken out of context and then can't be taken literally.

Bill


#147989 - 04/22/03 11:26 PM Re: Electrical Accidents Info Centre (UK)  
sparky66wv  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,236
West Virginia
One could say that a gross majority of auto accidents involve people wearing glasses, but who would come to the conclusion that corrective lenses would cause an accident?

Also, 85% of statistic are made up...

[Linked Image]


-Virgil
Residential/Commercial Inspector
5 Star Inspections
Member IAEI

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Member Spotlight
BEAMEUP
BEAMEUP
WA
Posts: 27
Joined: December 2004
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.015s Queries: 15 (0.003s) Memory: 0.8178 MB (Peak: 0.9962 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-03-29 13:19:41 UTC