ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
Admin 16
Recent Posts
fuse rejectors
by gfretwell. 03/23/17 01:12 PM
Another Forum Update
by Admin. 03/22/17 03:04 PM
Dining room plugs
by watersparkfalls. 03/21/17 10:31 PM
TRUE POWER
by jraef. 03/21/17 09:13 PM
WEG CFW-11 Frequency Inverter
by jraef. 03/21/17 08:50 PM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
231,239 Are you busy
165,949 Re: Forum
160,476 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
1 registered members (TheShockDoctors), 85 guests, and 11 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
#140464 - 03/12/04 08:39 AM 7671 reference methods  
james S  Offline
Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 107
West England
when looking up current carrying capacities in the 7671 regulations ( IEE ) how would you decide which reference method to use if there where two used in the intallation in question eg if general twin core and earth cable was to run for 10 mtr clipped dirrect and then a further 10 mtr enclosed in a wall?between these two methods the diffrence can be as much as 15 amps [Linked Image]

or is it educated guess time?


Test Equipment:
Large Selection of Test Equipment For Electrical, HVAC, Test & Measurement
Large Selection of Test Equipment For Electrical, HVAC, Test & Measurement

#140465 - 03/12/04 11:14 AM Re: 7671 reference methods  
pauluk  Offline
Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 7,520
Norfolk, England
James,
The ratings are based on the maximum temperature at which the cable should be allowed to run, hence the fact that the "clipped direct" rating is higher because it will lose heat to the surrounding air more quickly than an enclosed cable. (The "clipped direct" ratings are too high in the current Regs., in my not-so-humble opinion, but that's another story. [Linked Image])

So in the situation you describe, you would have to go with the lower current and limit the cable to its enclosed rating.


#140466 - 03/12/04 12:26 PM Re: 7671 reference methods  
james S  Offline
Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 107
West England
just to clear it up then no matter what reference method used always go with the smallest rating method!
ie if there was again two core and earth cable to run 20 mtrs cliped direct and 1 mtr to drop down to fuse board in a insulated wall the insulated wall factor would be the factor used?

sorry to drag this one out but i think the regs fall down on scenarios such as this especialy when there is such a diffrence in carrying capacities involved!


#140467 - 03/12/04 01:14 PM Re: 7671 reference methods  
C-H  Offline
Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,497
Stockholm, Sweden
James,

The copper leads the heat away along the cable. This means that the current carrying capacity is higher than otherwise if the cable is enclosed or exposed to a higher than normal ambient temperature only for a short distance. I don't know if, and if so how, this is reflected in the IEE regulations, but it is likely that there are special provisions for this case. This doesn't mean you can use the clipped directly/free air value, but you may be able to use a higher value than that of a cable enclosed in an insulated wall for an indefinite length.


#140468 - 03/14/04 04:18 AM Re: 7671 reference methods  
pauluk  Offline
Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 7,520
Norfolk, England
Yes, as C-H says, where the length of cable in insulation is only very short, it is permissible to use a higher rating.

Here's an extract from the Electrician's Guide:
http://www.tlc-direct.co.uk/Book/4.3.6.htm



Member Spotlight
lil suzi
lil suzi
Midwest
Posts: 57
Joined: August 2003
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.014s Queries: 14 (0.003s) Memory: 0.7666 MB (Peak: 0.9075 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-03-23 18:16:25 UTC