The Electrical Contractor Network

ECN Electrical Forum
Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

Books, Tools and Test Equipment for Electrical and Construction Trades

Register Now!

Register Now!

We want your input!

Featured:
   

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

   
Recent Posts
Calling all Non-US members!! (Non-US only)
by aussie240
12/07/16 02:39 AM
Photo Upload Tutorial
by DanK
12/06/16 11:35 PM
Sprinklered equipment 26-008
by bigpapa
12/02/16 04:24 PM
On Delay Relay with Auto Reset
by Potseal
12/01/16 09:59 AM
Wow, that was close!
by jraef
11/28/16 07:06 PM
New in the Gallery:
12.5A through 0.75mm˛ flex (just out of curiosity)
Shout Box

Top Posters (30 Days)
gfretwell 13
HotLine1 9
Texas_Ranger 8
sparkyinak 7
Potseal 6
Who's Online
0 registered (), 92 Guests and 4 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#130092 - 02/03/06 05:48 AM Thermal Expansion
Dnkldorf Offline
Member

Registered: 12/12/04
Posts: 1091
Loc: nowhere usa
Another possible useless thought from the mind of Dnk....

This one involves thermal expansion of conductors. Away I go..

Does a conductor expand latterly with heat?

My thought goes like this. When things heat up, they expand, and then contract, when they cool.
When using pvc as an example, we need to use expansion couplings, due to this effect. The pvc "grows" in length. With an I-beam of steel,we see the same effect, so we see expansion joints on bridges, to compensate for this.

So, Copper wire must do the same, but to what degree? Lets say we are backstabbing receptacles. The wire, dependant on load, would basicaly, expand into the stab, and then back out when the load is removed. Would this be accurate? Or does the slack left in the wire, compensate for this?

Is this movement actually calculateable?(wording)

Any takers?


Dnk...

Editted for sp
looking for spell checker

[This message has been edited by Dnkldorf (edited 02-03-2006).]

[This message has been edited by Dnkldorf (edited 02-03-2006).]

Top
#130093 - 02/03/06 06:33 AM Re: Thermal Expansion
Ron Offline
Member

Registered: 03/13/02
Posts: 577
Loc: White Plains, NY
In my opinion, it is the heating and cooling that leads to the premature failures of the terminations in cheaper backstab receptacles.

BTW, try http://www.iespell.com/ for spell checking, it wrks greet for me.
_________________________
Ron

Top
#130094 - 02/03/06 07:02 AM Re: Thermal Expansion
Radar Offline
Member

Registered: 04/30/04
Posts: 349
Loc: Los Angeles, CA
Hey Dnk - here we are once again, heh?

You are exactly right. Copper, like most anything else, expands 3 dimensionally when it heats up. And as you know, any current through a resistance produces some small amount of conductor heating (minimal as it may be). And the expansion is quantifiable.

Each substance has a known (measured) coefficient of expansion, a measure of the degree of expansion relative to a set change in temperature. It is interesting to note that the coefficient of expansion of aluminum is greater than that of copper, which leads to one of the 2 serious problems with aluminum wiring (as noted by Ron): the constant and greater degree of cycles of expansion and contraction lead to loose connections, contributing to hi resistance connections. (The other problem with alu wiring is the tendency of the outside layer of aluminum to oxidize, also contributing to a hi resistance connection).

Somewhere I have a table of coefficients of expansion of several types of materials. If I can find it I'll scan it post it.

Radar


[This message has been edited by Radar (edited 02-03-2006).]
_________________________
There are 10 types of people. Those who know binary, and those who don't.

Top
#130095 - 02/03/06 09:54 AM Re: Thermal Expansion
John Crighton Offline
Member

Registered: 05/16/05
Posts: 172
Loc: Southern California
Nice explanation, Radar.

From Reference Data for Radio Engineers 7th ed.:

Aluminum: 22.9 ppm / degree C
Copper: 16.5 ppm / C

This means that an awg-12 copper wire heated from 20C to 75C expands in diameter by, oh, 74 millionths of an inch. And a 100-foot length gets 3/32" longer.

Edit following Dnk's comment below...

Sorry, not 3/32" -- it's 3/32 foot = 1.09"

PVC is something like 61 ppm/C, which works out to 4" expansion. Yep, there's still some difference between wire length and conduit length to compensate for.


[This message has been edited by John Crighton (edited 02-03-2006).]

Top
#130096 - 02/03/06 01:08 PM Re: Thermal Expansion
Dnkldorf Offline
Member

Registered: 12/12/04
Posts: 1091
Loc: nowhere usa
3/32" that's it? Hmmm...

IF pvc expands at roughly 4.5" per 100' at that temp. difference, and the wires only expand at 3/32", wouldn't the wires get damaged some how by the force of the pvc expanding?.

Table 352.44..


Dnk...

Top
#130097 - 02/03/06 04:41 PM Re: Thermal Expansion
John Crighton Offline
Member

Registered: 05/16/05
Posts: 172
Loc: Southern California
Dnk, see my correction above. Also, from Carlon's Expansion Joints for PVC Rigid Nonmetallic Conduit:

 Quote:
The coefficient of expansion for the wire inside the conduit is much lower than the nonmetallic conduit, therefore its length change due to expansion and contraction is very little. If the expansion joints are mounted correctly, there should be little concern as to its effect on the wires inside.


I guess the point is that the distance between end points of a straight conduit run doesn't change, or it changes roughly in the same way that the wire length does, so the wires aren't stressed. Since the TCOE for PVC is so high compared to other building materials, the purpose of expansion joints is more to compensate for the NMC expansion than to accomodate structural movement.

Top
#130098 - 02/03/06 05:13 PM Re: Thermal Expansion
JoeTestingEngr Offline
Member

Registered: 11/04/05
Posts: 786
Loc: Chicago, Il.
I deal with it in a couple of ways.
1.) Socketed ICs on R.O.W. mounted equipment. You get alot of crunching sounds when you press on the chips. The leads and socket materials have different coefficients.

2.) Programming underground storage tank monitoring systems. #2 diesel fuel is .00045. The number is needed for temperature compensated volumes.

I know that this is a little off-topic, but we also use gizmos that differentiate between fluids with 2 thermal conductivity coefficients. These RTD (Resistive Temperature Devices) let us know if the probes are suspended in hydrocarbons or water so that we might get our filters drained before the elements swell up and block flow.
Joe

Top



ECN Electrical Forums - sponsored by Electrical Contractor Network - Electrical and Code Related Discussion for Electrical Contractors, Electricians, Inspectors, Instructors, Engineers and other related Professionals