ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
Admin 16
Recent Posts
ESA Arc flash course
by TheShockDoctors. 03/24/17 10:15 AM
fuse rejectors
by HotLine1. 03/24/17 07:53 AM
Another Forum Update
by Admin. 03/22/17 03:04 PM
Dining room plugs
by watersparkfalls. 03/21/17 10:31 PM
TRUE POWER
by jraef. 03/21/17 09:13 PM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
231,331 Are you busy
166,070 Re: Forum
160,532 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 88 guests, and 12 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
#127726 - 10/16/01 07:10 AM Why oh why?  
Redsy  Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,056
Bucks County PA
Why is only 31% conduit fill allowed for 2 wires, as opposed to 40% for 3?
I assume that it is precautionary, in the event that only 2 wires of a 3phase system are used, and the magnetic fields aren't cancelling. However, for all the commentary in the Handbook, this is not mentioned.
Anyone else.


Tools for Electricians:

#127727 - 10/16/01 02:44 PM Re: Why oh why?  
Bill Addiss  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,875
NY, USA
Redsy,

My guess is that it would be because 2 wires together that took up 40% fill may be too tight to pull through a conduit because they would be like >> oo or 8 << and together might approach the inside conduit diameter with the 40% fill limit. It would be a tight one for sure! Straight pulls might not be so bad, but 360 degrees would be another thing.

Does that make sense?

Bill


[This message has been edited by Bill Addiss (edited 10-16-2001).]


#127728 - 10/16/01 08:49 PM Re: Why oh why?  
sparky  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,303
Redsy,
I see FPN #2 70-561, to back up the angle Bill's offered. Other than that the #'s do make me wonder if any specific mathematical logic was followed.
CMP9,,,
35!
no..29!
34 ?...
30
31.., an' it's break time!
[Linked Image]


#127729 - 10/16/01 10:06 PM Re: Why oh why?  
Redsy  Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,056
Bucks County PA
Guys,
Ahh..
The jam ratio! Lots of thought went into this idea. I think it refers to 3 wires, though. Not two.


#127730 - 10/16/01 11:02 PM Re: Why oh why?  
Bill Addiss  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,875
NY, USA
Redsy,

That's my best shot...

[Linked Image]
Bill


#127731 - 10/17/01 07:12 AM Re: Why oh why?  
Redsy  Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,056
Bucks County PA
Bill,

It's not anything that really concerns me. It's just something I have wondered about this in the past, and now, with this forum I thought I'd bounce it around.
Thanks.


#127732 - 10/17/01 07:22 AM Re: Why oh why?  
sparky  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,303
Redsy,
We are, as electricians, always complying to code, and left wondering about the rationale. The handbook only goes so far, the only other resource would be a formal interpetation.
The thing is, some codes, and specifics , are probably so old there's no one left to explain it's orgin.


#127733 - 10/17/01 12:47 PM Re: Why oh why?  
resqcapt19  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
IL
sparky,
A formal interpretation would be of no help in finding out the "why" as the NFPA requires that requests for a formal interpretation be submitted in a manner that will allow the NFPA to answer the question with either a "yes" or a "no". The only way that I know of would be to find the TCR (now known as ROP) and the TCD (now known as the ROC) for the proposal that became the rule.
Don(resqcapt19)


Don(resqcapt19)

#127734 - 10/17/01 07:55 PM Re: Why oh why?  
sparky  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,303
Don,
Sounds like some serious archive searching, at least on this issue. It makes me wonder if anyone actually pursues code history to this extent.



Member Spotlight
richard
richard
L.I. New York
Posts: 94
Joined: August 2003
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.021s Queries: 14 (0.004s) Memory: 0.7975 MB (Peak: 0.9650 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-03-24 17:56:20 UTC