ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#122966 - 02/12/06 02:46 PM Fuse Box Violations
Admin Offline

Administrator
Member
Registered: 10/07/00
Posts: 3417
Loc: NY, USA
Quote:
Count up the violations/ hazards in this one. From a home built in the mid fifties.

trublu832
Top
Tools for Electricians:
#122967 - 02/12/06 05:39 PM Re: Fuse Box Violations
jfwayer Offline
Member
Registered: 05/15/05
Posts: 30
Loc: Fairmont, WV, USA
Assuming this is the service panel:
0) 110.12(C) broken strand in service cable grounded wire.
1) 230.70 No means to disconnect the two circuits (using wh, blk, grn cables) connected directly to service cable.
2) 230.82 Assume the two wh, blk, grn cables do not fall under this allowable connection before service disconnect.
3) 110.14(A) Assume the terminals the two wh, blk, grn cables connect to are not identified for more than one conductor.
4) 200.7(C)(1) requires the white wires connected to the red service wire to be reidentified with a color other than white, gray, or green.
5) 110.14(A) assume the lower right screw on the neutral bar is not identified for more than 1 conductor.
6) 312.5(A) grounding wire enters a hole that is not adequately closed
7) 312.5(C) the two wh, blk, grn cables are not secured to the cabinet
8) 240.51(B) there is evidence of overfusing, one or more 14 AWG or 12 AWG wires appear to be "protected" by a 30A fuse.
9) 240.54 requires type S fuses under these circumstances.
10) 250.24(B) it is unclear whether or not the neutral bar is bounded to the cabinet
_________________________
JFW
Top
#122968 - 02/12/06 06:33 PM Re: Fuse Box Violations
electure Offline


Member
Registered: 12/24/00
Posts: 4259
Loc: Fullerton, CA USA
It seems to me like applying a Code that's 50 years newer than the installation is not that much different than applying a Code that's 50 years older than the installation.

Does it meet 1905 Code?
Top
#122969 - 02/12/06 07:07 PM Re: Fuse Box Violations
jfwayer Offline
Member
Registered: 05/15/05
Posts: 30
Loc: Fairmont, WV, USA
It seems to me that the plastic sheathed cable is not 50 years old and the source of most of the violations. (Old romex would have reduced ground wire sizes.)
_________________________
JFW
Top
#122970 - 02/12/06 08:04 PM Re: Fuse Box Violations
mxslick Offline
Member
Registered: 10/24/04
Posts: 803
Loc: Atomic City, ID USA
Did you all notice that the wires entering on the left appear to be SO CABLE!!

Not to mention that the white is lugged to the main AHEAD of the pullout fuses!!

Plus evidence of overheating on the lower-right hand pull out block's load connection.

Did anyone pull the meter out on this mess?!
_________________________
Stupid should be painful.
Top
#122971 - 02/13/06 04:20 AM Re: Fuse Box Violations
pauluk Offline
Member
Registered: 08/11/01
Posts: 7520
Loc: Norfolk, England
Quote:
Did you all notice that the wires entering on the left appear to be SO CABLE!!


And they appear to enter the lower left corner of the panel without any sort of bushing or other protection.

I often find systems here in which the original 1950s/60s insttallation was just fine, but the extensions and modifications to it in more recent times are the problem.

It looks to me as though this might be a similar sort of situation.
Top
#122972 - 02/13/06 10:28 AM Re: Fuse Box Violations
John Crighton Offline
Member
Registered: 05/16/05
Posts: 177
Loc: Southern California
There don't appear to be any EGCs at all. Was that typical for the Romex of the period, or were they cut off and thrown away?

How on Earth did some hack install those SOs on the main lugs without getting lit up???
Top
#122973 - 02/13/06 11:30 AM Re: Fuse Box Violations
mamills Offline
Member
Registered: 11/30/01
Posts: 745
Loc: Wharton, Texas, USA
It's amazing what those hacks can get away with...for a while. Just slip on a pair of ordinary gloves, grab a screwdriver with a real plastic grip, and take on the world . The insulation on those main conductors doesn't look too great. Might be some heating going on there also.

Trublu832: Can you tell us where those two SO's go?

Mike (mamills)
Top
#122974 - 02/13/06 12:44 PM Re: Fuse Box Violations
RODALCO Offline
Member
Registered: 12/08/05
Posts: 854
Loc: Titirangi, Akld, New Zealand
The black and white wire looped into the left top switch / fuse carries has no fuse protection on it by the looks of it.

Also at the right no bushing used for the bare earth wire,

on the earth / neutral bar the wires are not terminated in an eye shaped way under the screws, but straight.

Typically you see these types of cables in older NZ installations from the 50's too.

Some cables are in very good condtions while other cables have very brittle insulation.
_________________________
The product of rotation, excitation and flux produces electricty.
Top
#122975 - 02/13/06 01:16 PM Re: Fuse Box Violations
techie Offline
Member
Registered: 05/17/05
Posts: 246
Loc: palo alto, ca usa
Quote:
Did you all notice that the wires entering on the left appear to be SO CABLE!!



They look like solid conductors to me, which
means that it's not SO cable.

Look at how the wire holds its shape, and at the terminations on both the fuse block and the neutral bus.
Top
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >

Member Spotlight
Member Since: 02/23/13
Posts: 204
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box


Who's Online
0 registered (), 67 Guests and 10 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
 
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
 
Top Posters (30 Days)
Admin 47
HotLine1 43
gfretwell 19
Ruben Rocha 12
Trumpy 9
 
Newest Members
KrmtFrg, Stack, Scotto, Freecrowder, clee512

ECN Electrical Forums - sponsored by Electrical Contractor Network - Electrical and Code Related Discussion for Electrical Contractors, Electricians, Inspectors, Instructors, Engineers and other related Professionals