ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#121795 - 08/22/05 08:57 PM Up On The Roof
Admin Offline

Administrator
Member
Registered: 10/07/00
Posts: 3417
Loc: NY, USA
Quote:
Apparently there was a problem with the underground feeders and they decided it would be cheaper to go over the roof. When we proposed a repair the customer's reply; "No, we haven't had any problems so lets wait until we need to make the repair." 408V 3P Parallel feeders. They must have decided a straight line was not a good idea.

Bill (LearJet9)




Top
Tools for Electricians:
#121796 - 08/22/05 09:00 PM Re: Up On The Roof
BigJohn Offline
Member
Registered: 03/06/04
Posts: 391
Loc: Boston, MA
Reason # 271 Why I Hate PVC

-John
Top
#121797 - 08/22/05 10:24 PM Re: Up On The Roof
CTwireman Offline
Member
Registered: 02/07/02
Posts: 840
Loc: Connecticut, USA
Ok, let me play devil's advocate.

Yeah, it's ugly, but I don't see any code violations other than the lack of expansion couplings. That would explain the separation.


Furthermore, if there was a problem with the underground feeders, this may well have been an emergency fix done in a hurry to get the power back on.

I look at this and say "What's the big deal?"

Peter
_________________________
Peter
Top
#121798 - 08/23/05 01:16 AM Re: Up On The Roof
e57 Offline
Member
Registered: 05/27/03
Posts: 2876
Loc: S.F.,CA USA
I get the feeling that the roof is newer than the wacky run. I may have been straighter before the roofers pulled it to one side for thier work, and never put it back. The other stuff on the roof being a bit more rigid, they just lifted up, splid new roofing under, and put it back down. The very slinky PVC they just dragged around, after all, whats it gonna do? Leak?

I will eventualy fail, that guys just hoping its after he retires.
_________________________
Mark Heller
"Well - I oughta....." -Jackie Gleason
Top
#121799 - 08/23/05 04:20 AM Re: Up On The Roof
LearJet9 Offline
Member
Registered: 04/24/05
Posts: 197
Loc: Millis, MA USA
e57 is correct. The roof is newer than the PVC installation. CT is also correct. The PVC "repair" was an emergency installation when the UF failed.
Bill
Top
#121800 - 08/23/05 10:27 AM Re: Up On The Roof
John Crighton Offline
Member
Registered: 05/16/05
Posts: 177
Loc: Southern California
Judging from the corrosion on the straps, that "emergency" repair has been there a long time.

I don't think you can blame the PVC itself -- a properly cemented joint is as strong as the base material. (It says here on this can...)

It looks like maybe the S-curve might actually have been intentional, to mitigate the expansion effects. I wonder how much curvature you'd need to eliminate expansion joints? Would the wood sleepers eventually rub their way through the roof?
Top
#121801 - 08/23/05 06:10 PM Re: Up On The Roof
renosteinke Offline
Cat Servant
Member
Registered: 01/22/05
Posts: 5316
Loc: Blue Collar Country
A good illustration as to why our local code requires exposed conduit on roofs (like this) to have a ground wire....no matter what the material.
Top

Member Spotlight
Member Since: 11/17/00
Posts: 2232
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box


Who's Online
0 registered (), 59 Guests and 11 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
 
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
 
Top Posters (30 Days)
Admin 47
HotLine1 43
gfretwell 19
Ruben Rocha 12
Trumpy 9
 
Newest Members
Freecrowder, clee512, Jdscott2005, FAIZAN, Regitest2

ECN Electrical Forums - sponsored by Electrical Contractor Network - Electrical and Code Related Discussion for Electrical Contractors, Electricians, Inspectors, Instructors, Engineers and other related Professionals