The Electrical Contractor Network

ECN Electrical Forum
Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

Books, Tools and Test Equipment for Electrical and Construction Trades

Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#121657 - 08/04/05 09:52 PM Violation Photos II
Webmaster Offline

Administrator
Member

Registered: 10/07/00
Posts: 3142
Loc: NY, USA
 Quote:
These were taken at the pizza parlor around the corner from my house.. they serve the best pizza in town, but the wiring leaves a little to be desired.

techie









Top
Tools for Electricians:
#121658 - 08/05/05 04:02 AM Re: Violation Photos II
pauluk Offline
Member

Registered: 08/11/01
Posts: 7693
Loc: Norfolk, England
Bozo's Electrical Code, article 99.243:

(1). Where the installation of a proper electrical box and fixed cabling will prove to be either (a) too expensive or (b) too much trouble, it shall be permitted to install any type of cord with minimal support.

(2). Any such cord so installed shall be connected to existing building wiring using splices which shall be left open to allow for air-cooling and visual inspection.

Definitions:

"Too expensive": The estimated cost of following the NEC will exceed $5.

"Too much trouble": The estimated time to complete the job following NEC rules will exceed 10 minutes.





[This message has been edited by pauluk (edited 08-05-2005).]

Top
#121659 - 08/05/05 10:37 AM Re: Violation Photos II
John Crighton Offline
Member

Registered: 05/16/05
Posts: 172
Loc: Southern California
Is there an actual code violation in the first picture, or is it just showing what the cable goes to?

Top
#121660 - 08/05/05 05:46 PM Re: Violation Photos II
SolarPowered Offline
Member

Registered: 07/05/04
Posts: 615
Loc: Palo Alto, CA, USA
I'm thinking the conduit body supporting the fixture is a violation.

Top
#121661 - 08/05/05 06:19 PM Re: Violation Photos II
techie Offline
Member

Registered: 05/17/05
Posts: 240
Loc: palo alto, ca usa
My thought was that the conduit body was being used as a j-box, which I don't think is kosher..

Top
#121662 - 08/05/05 11:50 PM Re: Violation Photos II
e57 Offline
Member

Registered: 05/27/03
Posts: 2837
Loc: S.F.,CA USA
410.16F The EMT doesn't seem to be supporting the fixture very well, i.e. sag. One could also read in some of 314.23F. RMC would be better choice, that is if the c-codulette is rated to have splices in it.

The other stuff is just crack shack type garbage.
_________________________
Mark Heller
"Well - I oughta....." -Jackie Gleason

Top
#121663 - 08/06/05 02:32 AM Re: Violation Photos II
Alan Belson Offline
Member

Registered: 03/23/05
Posts: 1801
Loc: Mayenne N. France
Mark,
What's a crack shack!? Hopefully not a bordello, methinks!
Alan
_________________________
Wood work but can't!

Top
#121664 - 08/06/05 09:50 AM Re: Violation Photos II
e57 Offline
Member

Registered: 05/27/03
Posts: 2837
Loc: S.F.,CA USA
Crack Shack: See Crack House

 Quote:
Crack House: An establishment of some kind where people make, deal and smoke crack cocaine. This could be a house, an apartment, or a shack to name a few, similar to a coke house.“You can always find a dealer at the crack house.”

"All the crack heads go to that crack house to smoke."

"The police raided a huge crack house and confiscated over 1000 rocks!"

Source Urban Dictionary
_________________________
Mark Heller
"Well - I oughta....." -Jackie Gleason

Top
#121665 - 08/06/05 11:37 AM Re: Violation Photos II
renosteinke Offline
Cat Servant
Member

Registered: 01/22/05
Posts: 5305
Loc: Blue Collar Country
The use of a conduit body at the base of the light brings up an interesting "loophole."
We can assume that splicing in this body is OK. Oddly enough, had they used a box, they would have had to support it. Conduit bodies have no such requirement.

Top
#121666 - 08/07/05 05:45 PM Re: Violation Photos II
wa2ise Offline
Member

Registered: 11/29/02
Posts: 771
Loc: Oradell NJ USA
In the 3rd picture, where the yellow cord enters the sawed off conduit and conduit body, it looks like the stripped off cord jacket is clamped under the conduit body cover. As if he was trying to do that for strain relief to protect the connections inside. Of course he didn't quite meet code....

Top
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >



ECN Electrical Forums - sponsored by Electrical Contractor Network - Electrical and Code Related Discussion for Electrical Contractors, Electricians, Inspectors, Instructors, Engineers and other related Professionals