ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#11806 - 07/23/02 01:02 PM CATV cable
mountainman Offline
Member
Registered: 01/29/02
Posts: 54
Loc: Richmond Va. U.S.A.
This is for all the inspector members and anyone from U.L. I just inspected a satalite installation on a high rise were the cable was dropped down 13 stories in a riser. The cable is marked CL2P and CATV. I cannot find in article 820-53 were CL2P is the same as CATVP. Can anyone help me out with this?
Top
Work Gear for Electricians and the Trades
#11807 - 07/23/02 04:13 PM Re: CATV cable
Dana Offline
Junior Member
Registered: 07/23/02
Posts: 4
Loc: Wasilla, Alaska, U.S.A. YA!
Shouldn't the cable be marked as a riser "R" rather than a plenum "P"?
The listings aren't the same unless marked as dual purpose.
N.E.C. also specifically prohibits type CATV as riser or plenum cable [820-51 (c)].
Top
#11808 - 07/23/02 05:53 PM Re: CATV cable
Gwz Offline
Member
Registered: 04/29/02
Posts: 197
300.19 is not mentioned in 820.

Should vertical support be considered for 13 floors?

Glenn
Top
#11809 - 07/24/02 11:34 PM Re: CATV cable
Scott35 Offline

Broom Pusher and
Member
Registered: 10/19/00
Posts: 2707
Loc: Anaheim, CA. USA
Just looking at figure 725-61 [cable substitution hierarchy] from 1996 NEC article 725-61, it says CL2P may be sub'ed for CL2R, and CL2R is listed for use in vertical riser runs penetrating more than one floor.
It also directs from the MPP / CMP box to the CL2P box, which flows out to the CL2R stuff, which is covered in the MPR / CMR section.

Looking at table 820-53 [96 NEC] the permitted sub's for Cable Type CATV include CMP and CMR.

FYI, the "2" in the listing is designating it for use as Class 2 cable

Scott S.E.T.
_________________________
Scott " 35 " Thompson
Just Say NO To Green Eggs And Ham!
Top
#11810 - 07/25/02 02:06 PM Re: CATV cable
Dana Offline
Junior Member
Registered: 07/23/02
Posts: 4
Loc: Wasilla, Alaska, U.S.A. YA!
Well, Mountainman, looks like they've put the wrong cable downhole.
Hope they come up with a satifactory resolution for you. (Which in my opinion is "Sorry, but it has to be replaced. And it probably should have support wedges on the top, 5th and 9th floors too. Let's check the data sheet from the mfgr." Thanks gwz).
As an aside, which code was the building constructed to? I presumed the 99 when I posted my first reply.
Top

Member Spotlight
Member Since: 11/17/00
Posts: 2232
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box


Who's Online
0 registered (), 94 Guests and 9 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
 
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
 
Top Posters (30 Days)
Admin 51
HotLine1 43
gfretwell 17
Trumpy 16
Ruben Rocha 13
 
Newest Members
Freecrowder, clee512, Jdscott2005, FAIZAN, Regitest2

ECN Electrical Forums - sponsored by Electrical Contractor Network - Electrical and Code Related Discussion for Electrical Contractors, Electricians, Inspectors, Instructors, Engineers and other related Professionals