ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#112822 - 10/03/01 06:42 PM Sign your Name?
Admin Offline

Administrator
Member
Registered: 10/07/00
Posts: 3417
Loc: NY, USA

Quote:
In a nearly new Jaguar dealership, we discovered this while installing some new equipment. The contractor that did this not only forgot to pull the shipping label with his name on it off of the panel can, he put a big logo sticker on the panel cover with his name on it!

I guess he's proud ....

Scott (Electure)
Top
Tools for Electricians:
#112823 - 10/04/01 07:38 PM Re: Sign your Name?
Jim M Offline
Member
Registered: 08/10/01
Posts: 457
Loc: Chestertown, MD, USA
Besides the sloppy wire run it looks like the locknut is missing. Is this rigid or IMC? And why is the wire in front of the cover insert?
Top
#112824 - 10/04/01 08:29 PM Re: Sign your Name?
rhagfo Offline
Member
Registered: 04/16/01
Posts: 43
Loc: Portland, OR. USA
I am just a handy home owner, but to me it looks like the piece of rigid is too long to put a lock nut on the outside of the enclosure, and there is no bushing on the end to protect the wires from chafing.
Top
#112825 - 10/05/01 03:38 AM Re: Sign your Name?
sparky Offline
Member
Registered: 10/18/00
Posts: 5303
rhagfo;
i'm not pickin' on you here, but if it's bad enough to be caught by the untrained eye...it's bad!
Top
#112826 - 10/05/01 04:50 AM Re: Sign your Name?
electure Offline


Member
Registered: 12/24/00
Posts: 4259
Loc: Fullerton, CA USA
The rigid nipple coming up from the bottom is a 2"X6". It passes completely through the KO, with about 1/2" inside the can before the threads even start! The horizontal nipple has locknuts only on the insides of the cans. There's not a bushing to be found anywhere I've been in the whole building.
The wires across the deadfront were just being held up so I could get a better pic of this glorious work (they were laying across the sharp edge of the nipple).
Any wiring above the T-bar ceiling is a breeze to trace, as there are no blank covers on any of the boxes.
Yup, it's bad.
Top
#112827 - 10/05/01 12:00 PM Re: Sign your Name?
Merritt Offline
Member
Registered: 04/06/01
Posts: 21
Loc: Miami, Fl, USA
well, to say the least, i think i see a green wire comming out of the offending nipple.. my guess is the boxes are bonded together.. i hope...

-m
_________________________
Remember when you read my posts, im only 17, still learning... "Hey, its takes what it takes!"
Top
#112828 - 10/05/01 02:55 PM Re: Sign your Name?
Bill Addiss Offline
Member
Registered: 10/07/00
Posts: 3875
Loc: NY, USA
rhagfo,

Good call, I just wanted to add (for general public) that a locknut should be inside and outside the box too so that they could be tightened properly.

Bill
Top
#112829 - 10/07/01 05:49 AM Re: Sign your Name?
electure Offline


Member
Registered: 12/24/00
Posts: 4259
Loc: Fullerton, CA USA
Another point we should probably bring up is that any conduit 1-1/4" or larger, &/or containing conductors #4 or larger is required to have a bushing on the end to protect the conductor from the sharp edge.

Also, a rigid conduit nipple as shown is required to have a bushing regardless of its trade size.
Top
#112830 - 10/07/01 05:36 PM Re: Sign your Name?
Nick Offline
Member
Registered: 08/13/01
Posts: 599
Loc: Riverside, CA
Electure,
I'm just being nit picky here. I have never seen any requirement saying conduits 1-1/4 or larger have to have bushings. Lots of sections refer us to 300-4(f). Conduits containing #4 conductors or larger. The way I see it a 3/4" conduit with 2 #4's requires a bushing. A 2" with 20 #10's does not. Please correct me if I am wrong but having heard the 1-1/4" or larger reference before, I think it is either part of an older code that is not valid anymore or one of those many untruths taken as code because thats how we were taught.
I do agree with the rigid conduit reference.
Nick
Top
#112831 - 10/07/01 07:34 PM Re: Sign your Name?
electure Offline


Member
Registered: 12/24/00
Posts: 4259
Loc: Fullerton, CA USA
I have talked trash.
Nick's right. There was a 1-1/4" rule, but apparently it's gone even by '96.
Yes, it was from previous codes.



[This message has been edited by electure (edited 10-08-2001).]
Top
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >

Member Spotlight
Member Since: 07/05/02
Posts: 8211
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box


Who's Online
0 registered (), 45 Guests and 8 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
 
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
 
Top Posters (30 Days)
Admin 49
HotLine1 43
gfretwell 18
Ruben Rocha 12
Trumpy 9
 
Newest Members
Freecrowder, clee512, Jdscott2005, FAIZAN, Regitest2

ECN Electrical Forums - sponsored by Electrical Contractor Network - Electrical and Code Related Discussion for Electrical Contractors, Electricians, Inspectors, Instructors, Engineers and other related Professionals