The Electrical Contractor Network

ECN Electrical Forum
Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

Books, Tools and Test Equipment for Electrical and Construction Trades

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 >
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#109621 - 11/14/05 07:39 PM What's Wrong With This Service??
Webmaster Offline

Administrator
Member

Registered: 10/07/00
Posts: 3142
Loc: NY, USA
 Quote:
Found this on a pre-purchase inspection!

yaktx

Top
2014 / 2011 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
#109622 - 11/14/05 07:55 PM Re: What's Wrong With This Service??
Elviscat Offline
Member

Registered: 08/13/05
Posts: 214
Loc: Seattle Washington USA
Well to start with the obvious, unprotected conductors dubble-lugged to the service conductors, one is white and not re-identified, romex entering with no protector through an unsealed knockout in an apparently 3R enclousure, probably a couple more I'm missing. And there's the non-code issues of neatness and the fact that it's a FPE

-Will


[This message has been edited by Elviscat (edited 11-14-2005).]

Top
#109623 - 11/14/05 11:05 PM Re: What's Wrong With This Service??
stamcon Offline
Member

Registered: 03/24/01
Posts: 322
Loc: So San Francisco CA
Looks like the EGC and grounded conductor from the NM are under one screw on the neutral bar.

steve

Top
#109624 - 11/15/05 06:25 AM Re: What's Wrong With This Service??
sstrick Offline
Junior Member

Registered: 12/21/04
Posts: 6
Loc: Independence, MO USA
The breakers are upside-down; an unused breaker in the ON position; no seperation of grounded and grounding bars (must be a sub panel since no main breaker!); tons of others I'm SURE.

Top
#109625 - 11/15/05 06:33 AM Re: What's Wrong With This Service??
mamills Offline
Member

Registered: 11/30/01
Posts: 739
Loc: Wharton, Texas, USA
Yaktx: Where's the EGC connected, since it doesn't look like it's headed for the ground?

Was the dead-front cover in place when you got there, or is it off for the inspection/pic? I wish I had a dime for every panel I've seen with an AWOL cover .

Any ideas where the double-luggeds go?

Mike (mamills)

[This message has been edited by mamills (edited 11-15-2005).]

Top
#109626 - 11/15/05 04:25 PM Re: What's Wrong With This Service??
HLCbuild Offline
Member

Registered: 12/05/04
Posts: 206
Loc: Herndon,Va USA
As sstrick says (must be a subpanel ...)If it is, where is the insulated grounded conductor and seperate neutral bar?

Top
#109627 - 11/15/05 05:15 PM Re: What's Wrong With This Service??
renosteinke Offline
Cat Servant
Member

Registered: 01/22/05
Posts: 5305
Loc: Blue Collar Country
Interesting panel.

The "down for off" requirement hasn't been around all that long; I have a Sq D panel that was set up as this one ie; that is, intended to have two horizontal rows of breakers.

Which is what I am curious about: Where did all those breakers go? And why use half-width breakers in an "empty" panel?

Top
#109628 - 11/15/05 05:45 PM Re: What's Wrong With This Service??
Celtic Offline
Member

Registered: 02/26/05
Posts: 367
Loc: NJ
An easier question would be:
What's RIGHT with this service?

LOL
_________________________
~~ CELTIC ~~
...-= NJ =-...

Top
#109629 - 11/15/05 06:58 PM Re: What's Wrong With This Service??
Elviscat Offline
Member

Registered: 08/13/05
Posts: 214
Loc: Seattle Washington USA
This could be a main, no breaker is required if there are less then six breakers (4 full sized single poles, 2 double poles), plus the three wire feed and the EGC seems to me to indicate a main panel, perhaps you could clear this up yaktx?

Top
#109630 - 11/15/05 07:21 PM Re: What's Wrong With This Service??
yaktx Offline
Member

Registered: 02/19/03
Posts: 286
Loc: Austin, Texas, USA
 Quote:
Yaktx: Where's the EGC connected, since it doesn't look like it's headed for the ground?


I assume you are referring to the GEC, meandering off to the right in an upward direction? The answer is nowhere. The house was replumbed and the plumber never replaced the ground clamp. The deadfront was there.

Nearly all Stab-Lok panels had one row of upside down breakers, which was legal at the time.

The lack of a main breaker does not mean this is a subpanel. I assure you the meter was right above this panel. In this case, it is service equipment which is in violation of 408.36(A). This service appears to be from the '70s, and my vintage NEC collection tells me it was illegal then, too. Nevertheless, many such installations were approved in my area during this time.

Top
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 >



ECN Electrical Forums - sponsored by Electrical Contractor Network - Electrical and Code Related Discussion for Electrical Contractors, Electricians, Inspectors, Instructors, Engineers and other related Professionals