The Electrical Contractor Network

ECN Electrical Forum
Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

Books, Tools and Test Equipment for Electrical and Construction Trades

Register Now!

Register Now!

We want your input!

Featured:
   

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

   
Recent Posts
Sprinklered equipment 26-008
by bigpapa
12/02/16 04:24 PM
On Delay Relay with Auto Reset
by Potseal
12/01/16 09:59 AM
Wow, that was close!
by jraef
11/28/16 07:06 PM
Earthquake in New Zeeland
by RODALCO
11/27/16 11:25 PM
Calling all Non-US members!! (Non-US only)
by Tjia1981
11/27/16 06:33 AM
New in the Gallery:
12.5A through 0.75mm˛ flex (just out of curiosity)
Shout Box

Top Posters (30 Days)
gfretwell 13
HotLine1 9
Texas_Ranger 8
sparkyinak 7
Trumpy 6
Who's Online
0 registered (), 284 Guests and 4 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 >
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#100852 - 01/12/07 05:16 PM subpanel debate
trekkie76 Offline
Member

Registered: 06/19/04
Posts: 219
Loc: baileyville, maine, usa
Hello Guys,

I am working in a commercial building, 200A 120Y/208V service. The meter is on the building, with the service conductors terminating in a 200A MB panel. Their is a 200A sub in the next stud pocket over fed from the main panel.

Here is the controversy. I asked for 5 runs of THHN to feed the subpanel, and the boss told me that it only needed 4 wires.
I asked him how you could make a load side connection to the grounded conductor, and he responded the inspector told him that because the panels where next to each other, the neutral and ground where bonded in the subpanel as well as in the main panel. Could anyone play devils advocate for me and tell me where I have gone astray?
Thanks, Gary

[This message has been edited by trekkie76 (edited 01-12-2007).]

Top
2014 / 2011 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
#100853 - 01/12/07 06:23 PM Re: subpanel debate
Ron Offline
Member

Registered: 03/13/02
Posts: 577
Loc: White Plains, NY
Gary, you are correct. It should be a 5 conductor run for 3 phase 4 wire system plus ground. You are not permitted to have a n-g bond downstream of the main bonding jumper unless it is a separately derived source.
_________________________
Ron

Top
#100854 - 01/13/07 06:32 AM Re: subpanel debate
JohnJ0906 Offline
Member

Registered: 10/19/06
Posts: 65
Loc: Baltimore MD USA
If the wires are in metal conduit, you may not need a EGC per se, bonding would be through the conduit itself. How are the Phase conductors fed in the first panel? Do they come from a breaker or from the main breaker line side?

Top
#100855 - 01/14/07 02:35 PM Re: subpanel debate
trekkie76 Offline
Member

Registered: 06/19/04
Posts: 219
Loc: baileyville, maine, usa
The subpanel is fed from a 3 phase breaker on the load side of the main. I havent done anything yet, I was going to pipe it. If I used an acceptable metallic raceway I would not need an equipment ground, but I would still have to seperate nuetrals and grounds, correct? Can anyone think of a reason why the inspector would tell my boss such a thing?

Top
#100856 - 01/14/07 03:33 PM Re: subpanel debate
Tom Offline
Member

Registered: 01/01/01
Posts: 1069
Loc: Shinnston, WV USA
If you run the feeder in a metal raceway, then all you need to do is keep the neutrals insulated from the enclosure and have a separate equipment ground bus.

Surely you have enough imagination to come up with a reason for the inspectors statement. I don't know about your area, but I know two around here that had former careers as CATV installer & the other one was a backhoe operator. With qualifications like that, they will occaisionally make a mis-statement about the NEC.

Tom

[This message has been edited by Tom (edited 01-14-2007).]
_________________________
Few things are harder to put up with than the annoyance of a good example.

Top
#100857 - 01/15/07 01:18 PM Re: subpanel debate
trekkie76 Offline
Member

Registered: 06/19/04
Posts: 219
Loc: baileyville, maine, usa
Tom, Normally I would agree with you, but this guy has been an inpector for about 35 years!! He is very knowledgable, so something is not right. I am going to discuss this further with my boss tommorrow. Thanks all for your input, Gary

Top
#100858 - 01/15/07 01:40 PM Re: subpanel debate
renosteinke Offline
Cat Servant
Member

Registered: 01/22/05
Posts: 5305
Loc: Blue Collar Country
I saw this 'short cut' once.....

As in this example, the panels were next to each other, with but a short nipple connecting them. The nipple was secured properly, with locknuts on both sides of the sheet metal.

Unfortunately, in the thirty years or so since the place was built, the connection was no longer as good as it once was. A little corrosion, a little vibration ... and the resistance of the connection increased. In effect, the nipple became a resistor.

Since the neutral was bonded to the case, the nipple was the only return path for unbalanced current. With the nipple no longer reliable, the "voltage to ground" varied greatly as loads changed during the course of the day.

Finally, one Thanksgiving holiday, the 'swing' in voltage became great enough to fry a large number of small surge suppressors. Looking at the circuits involved, all were powered from the same phase - though several circuits were involved. We looked and looked and looked - then realised what we were NOT seeing was any neutral wire to that panel!

I repaired this, and all was well. Indeed, the IT guys were astounded in all the mysterious power quality issues that went away! They had more fun with all their fancy scopes and meters than a kid on Christmas

Since then, I've be a lot more focused on keeping my ground path and my neutral separated.

Top
#100859 - 01/15/07 08:14 PM Re: subpanel debate
EV607797 Offline
Member

Registered: 10/25/06
Posts: 756
Loc: Fredericksburg, VA, USA
I think you might be misunderstanding what they are telling you. Your fifth conductor is assumed to be a bonding conductor between the panels. If the panels are connected with the proper metallic nipple, locknuts, bushings, etc., this becomes the fifth (bonding) conductor. The other four become A,B,C and N.

The sub panel's neutral bar IS NOT bonded to the can.

Now, if you are using a non-metallic connection between the panels, then you'll need a fifh conductor for bonding.

The only exceptions to this are a few rare ones when dealing with detatched buildings.
_________________________
---Ed---

"But the guy at Home Depot said it would work."

Top
#100860 - 01/15/07 09:08 PM Re: subpanel debate
gfretwell Offline

Member

Registered: 07/20/04
Posts: 9045
Loc: Estero,Fl,usa
 Quote:
I repaired this, and all was well. Indeed, the IT guys were astounded in all the mysterious power quality issues that went away! They had more fun with all their fancy scopes and meters than a kid on Christmas


You just had the wrong IT guys or they had the wrong tools.
My Drainitz would have found that bad neutral in a minute or a foot of tape, whichever came first.
_________________________
Greg Fretwell

Top
#100861 - 01/17/07 01:35 PM Re: subpanel debate
trekkie76 Offline
Member

Registered: 06/19/04
Posts: 219
Loc: baileyville, maine, usa
A little update, I asked the electrical instructor at the local tech college, who is very knowledgeable, and he said that because the panels are grouped together they are one service. He said it is in 230-70, which pretains to the six disconnect rule. I am unable to see how this applys, can anyone help?

Top
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 >



ECN Electrical Forums - sponsored by Electrical Contractor Network - Electrical and Code Related Discussion for Electrical Contractors, Electricians, Inspectors, Instructors, Engineers and other related Professionals